| Attributes | Values |
|---|
| rdf:type
| |
| Description
| - METHODS: The paper focuses on the simulation of several variants of double transparent facades in DesignBuilder. It is simplified five-storey office building model. First example is simple transparent facade building with triple glazing which is compared with four type of double transparent facade building. Different of this double facade is size of its cavity - 300 mm, 600 mm, 1000 mm and 1500 mm. Simulations were performed on models in variations of the closed facade openings. The next section describes the simulation of several variants of glazing in winter and its influence on the heat loss. Simulations are performed on the data model on one floor with a size of double transparent facade cavity 500 mm. In the summary are indicated types of glazing with the best properties. The final section is focused on the simulation of glazing types, shading elements position and type of the control parameters for shading elements. Their influence on the heat gains in summer is simulated in the DesignBuilder. RESULTS: The best variant in this study is double transparent facade with outer facade from a single Low - E glass with external shading elements and insulating double Low - E glass filled with argon gas. The distance between inner and outer transparent facade is best with size of cavity 600 mm, which are the most balanced heat gains and losses in comparison with other options. CONCLUSIONS: The largest savings are in comparison of single transparent facade building and double transparent facade building occurs during the summer. Double transparent facade saves about 30% on the cooling. In conclusion, the double transparent facades have a stable position in facade technology of building.
- METHODS: The paper focuses on the simulation of several variants of double transparent facades in DesignBuilder. It is simplified five-storey office building model. First example is simple transparent facade building with triple glazing which is compared with four type of double transparent facade building. Different of this double facade is size of its cavity - 300 mm, 600 mm, 1000 mm and 1500 mm. Simulations were performed on models in variations of the closed facade openings. The next section describes the simulation of several variants of glazing in winter and its influence on the heat loss. Simulations are performed on the data model on one floor with a size of double transparent facade cavity 500 mm. In the summary are indicated types of glazing with the best properties. The final section is focused on the simulation of glazing types, shading elements position and type of the control parameters for shading elements. Their influence on the heat gains in summer is simulated in the DesignBuilder. RESULTS: The best variant in this study is double transparent facade with outer facade from a single Low - E glass with external shading elements and insulating double Low - E glass filled with argon gas. The distance between inner and outer transparent facade is best with size of cavity 600 mm, which are the most balanced heat gains and losses in comparison with other options. CONCLUSIONS: The largest savings are in comparison of single transparent facade building and double transparent facade building occurs during the summer. Double transparent facade saves about 30% on the cooling. In conclusion, the double transparent facades have a stable position in facade technology of building. (en)
|
| Title
| - Heat Losses and Gains Depending on the Size of Double Transparent Facade Cavity
- Heat Losses and Gains Depending on the Size of Double Transparent Facade Cavity (en)
|
| skos:prefLabel
| - Heat Losses and Gains Depending on the Size of Double Transparent Facade Cavity
- Heat Losses and Gains Depending on the Size of Double Transparent Facade Cavity (en)
|
| skos:notation
| - RIV/68407700:21110/14:00219042!RIV15-MSM-21110___
|
| http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivita
| |
| http://linked.open...avai/riv/aktivity
| |
| http://linked.open...vai/riv/dodaniDat
| |
| http://linked.open...aciTvurceVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open.../riv/druhVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...iv/duvernostUdaju
| |
| http://linked.open...titaPredkladatele
| |
| http://linked.open...dnocenehoVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...ai/riv/idVysledku
| - RIV/68407700:21110/14:00219042
|
| http://linked.open...riv/jazykVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open.../riv/klicovaSlova
| - double transparent facade cavity; heat gain; heat loss (en)
|
| http://linked.open.../riv/klicoveSlovo
| |
| http://linked.open...ontrolniKodProRIV
| |
| http://linked.open...v/mistoKonaniAkce
| |
| http://linked.open...i/riv/mistoVydani
| |
| http://linked.open...i/riv/nazevZdroje
| - Proceedings of Indoor Air 2014
|
| http://linked.open...in/vavai/riv/obor
| |
| http://linked.open...ichTvurcuVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...cetTvurcuVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...UplatneniVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...iv/tvurceVysledku
| |
| http://linked.open...vavai/riv/typAkce
| |
| http://linked.open.../riv/zahajeniAkce
| |
| number of pages
| |
| http://purl.org/ne...btex#hasPublisher
| - Department of Mechanical Engineering, the University of Hong Kong
|
| https://schema.org/isbn
| |
| http://localhost/t...ganizacniJednotka
| |
![[RDF Data]](/fct/images/sw-rdf-blue.png)
![[cxml]](/fct/images/cxml_doc.png)
![[csv]](/fct/images/csv_doc.png)
![[text]](/fct/images/ntriples_doc.png)
![[turtle]](/fct/images/n3turtle_doc.png)
![[ld+json]](/fct/images/jsonld_doc.png)
![[rdf+json]](/fct/images/json_doc.png)
![[rdf+xml]](/fct/images/xml_doc.png)
![[atom+xml]](/fct/images/atom_doc.png)
![[html]](/fct/images/html_doc.png)