. . . " \u00DA\u010Dastn\u00EDk\u016Fm smlouvy o z\u0159\u00EDzen\u00ED v\u011Bcn\u00E9ho b\u0159emene by \u017E\u00E1dn\u00E1 okolnost nebr\u00E1nila v ujedn\u00E1n\u00ED smluvn\u00EDch d\u016Fvod\u016F pro odstoupen\u00ED od smlouvy v re\u017Eimu \u00A7 48 odst. 1 ob\u010D. z\u00E1k., nap\u0159. i z d\u016Fvod\u016F nezaplacen\u00ED \u00FAplaty za z\u0159\u00EDzen\u00ED v\u011Bcn\u00E9ho b\u0159emene. P\u0159i takov\u00FDch v\u00FDchodisc\u00EDch je pak podle n\u00E1zoru dovolac\u00EDho soudu uplatniteln\u00FD i institut odstoupen\u00ED od smlouvy op\u00EDraj\u00EDc\u00ED se o ustanoven\u00ED \u00A7 517 odst. 1 ob\u010D. z\u00E1k., proto\u017Ee i ten dopad\u00E1 na shodn\u00FD okruh p\u0159\u00EDpad\u016F spo\u010D\u00EDvaj\u00EDc\u00ED v nepln\u011Bn\u00ED dohodnut\u00E9 \u00FAplaty." . .