. . "1"^^ . . . "CHECKLISTS FOR FIRE PROTECTION - Appropriate Qualitative Scales"@en . . "Rizika prov\u00E1z\u00ED ka\u017Edou lidskou \u010Dinnost. S c\u00EDlem zajistit bezpe\u010D\u00ED ve\u0159ejn\u00FDch aktiv, je t\u0159eba rizika identifikovat, analyzovat, hodnotit, \u0159\u00EDdit a vypo\u0159\u00E1d\u00E1vat. K uveden\u00E9mu c\u00EDli pot\u0159ebujeme n\u00E1stroje. V p\u0159\u00EDpad\u011B proces\u016F se pro hodnocen\u00ED rizika pou\u017E\u00EDvaj\u00ED n\u00E1stroje r\u016Fzn\u00E9 \u00FArovn\u011B, od jednoduch\u00FDch a\u017E po slo\u017Eit\u00E9, kter\u00E9 jsou spojen\u00E9 se zva\u017Eov\u00E1n\u00EDm n\u011Bkolika krit\u00E9ri\u00ED. K tradi\u010Dn\u00EDm n\u00E1stroj\u016Fm pat\u0159\u00ED kontroln\u00ED seznamy, kter\u00E9 jsou \u010Dasto kombinov\u00E1ny s jin\u00FDmi technikami, kter\u00FDmi se rizika identifikuj\u00ED. Kontroln\u00ED seznam je u\u017Eite\u010Dn\u00FDm n\u00E1strojem, kdy\u017E procesn\u00ED model, ke kter\u00E9mu se vztahuje je kvalitn\u00ED a kdy\u017E hodnotov\u00E1 stupnice, dle n\u00ED\u017E se prov\u00E1d\u00ED hodnocen\u00ED rizika m\u00E1 dobrou vypov\u00EDdac\u00ED hodnotu s ohledem na c\u00EDl hodnocen\u00ED. P\u0159edlo\u017Een\u00FD \u010Dl\u00E1nek analyzuje kontroln\u00ED seznamy v datab\u00E1zi \u010D\u00EDtaj\u00EDc\u00ED 165 polo\u017Eek, vyb\u00EDr\u00E1 kontroln\u00ED seznamy pou\u017Eiteln\u00E9 pro oblast po\u017E\u00E1rn\u00ED ochrany, kter\u00E9 t\u0159\u00EDd\u00ED podle \u010Dinnost\u00ED a k nim navrhuje hodnotov\u00E9 stupnice, kter\u00E9 zajist\u00ED dobr\u00E9 oce\u0148ov\u00E1n\u00ED rizika." . . . "KONTROLN\u00CD SEZNAMY PRO OBLAST PO\u017D\u00C1RN\u00CD OCHRANY - vhodn\u00E9 hodnotov\u00E9 stupnice"@cs . "978-80-7385-115-6" . "10"^^ . "P(7E11072)" . "KONTROLN\u00CD SEZNAMY PRO OBLAST PO\u017D\u00C1RN\u00CD OCHRANY - vhodn\u00E9 hodnotov\u00E9 stupnice"@cs . "[BC9F289495BF]" . "Ostrava" . . "KONTROLN\u00CD SEZNAMY PRO OBLAST PO\u017D\u00C1RN\u00CD OCHRANY - vhodn\u00E9 hodnotov\u00E9 stupnice" . "Ostrava" . "Rizika prov\u00E1z\u00ED ka\u017Edou lidskou \u010Dinnost. S c\u00EDlem zajistit bezpe\u010D\u00ED ve\u0159ejn\u00FDch aktiv, je t\u0159eba rizika identifikovat, analyzovat, hodnotit, \u0159\u00EDdit a vypo\u0159\u00E1d\u00E1vat. K uveden\u00E9mu c\u00EDli pot\u0159ebujeme n\u00E1stroje. V p\u0159\u00EDpad\u011B proces\u016F se pro hodnocen\u00ED rizika pou\u017E\u00EDvaj\u00ED n\u00E1stroje r\u016Fzn\u00E9 \u00FArovn\u011B, od jednoduch\u00FDch a\u017E po slo\u017Eit\u00E9, kter\u00E9 jsou spojen\u00E9 se zva\u017Eov\u00E1n\u00EDm n\u011Bkolika krit\u00E9ri\u00ED. K tradi\u010Dn\u00EDm n\u00E1stroj\u016Fm pat\u0159\u00ED kontroln\u00ED seznamy, kter\u00E9 jsou \u010Dasto kombinov\u00E1ny s jin\u00FDmi technikami, kter\u00FDmi se rizika identifikuj\u00ED. Kontroln\u00ED seznam je u\u017Eite\u010Dn\u00FDm n\u00E1strojem, kdy\u017E procesn\u00ED model, ke kter\u00E9mu se vztahuje je kvalitn\u00ED a kdy\u017E hodnotov\u00E1 stupnice, dle n\u00ED\u017E se prov\u00E1d\u00ED hodnocen\u00ED rizika m\u00E1 dobrou vypov\u00EDdac\u00ED hodnotu s ohledem na c\u00EDl hodnocen\u00ED. P\u0159edlo\u017Een\u00FD \u010Dl\u00E1nek analyzuje kontroln\u00ED seznamy v datab\u00E1zi \u010D\u00EDtaj\u00EDc\u00ED 165 polo\u017Eek, vyb\u00EDr\u00E1 kontroln\u00ED seznamy pou\u017Eiteln\u00E9 pro oblast po\u017E\u00E1rn\u00ED ochrany, kter\u00E9 t\u0159\u00EDd\u00ED podle \u010Dinnost\u00ED a k nim navrhuje hodnotov\u00E9 stupnice, kter\u00E9 zajist\u00ED dobr\u00E9 oce\u0148ov\u00E1n\u00ED rizika."@cs . . "RIV/68407700:21260/12:00202456!RIV13-MSM-21260___" . "Risks accompany any human activity. With aim to ensure the security of public assets, it is necessary to identify, analyse, assess, manage, and cope with risks. We need tools for that. In the case of processes there are used for risk assessment the tools of different levels, from simple to complex, which are related to the consideration of several criteria. To the traditional tools there are belonged the checklists, which are often combined with other techniques by help of which the risks are identified. The checklist is a useful tool when a process model, to which it is related, has a high quality and when a qualitative scale by which a risk assessment is performed, gives good evidence with regard to the target of evaluation. The present article analyses the checklists in the database of 165 items, selects checklists applicable to the area of fire protection, which sorts according to activities and proposes to them qualitative scales, which ensure a good valuation of risk."@en . "RIV/68407700:21260/12:00202456" . "Po\u017E\u00E1rn\u00ED ochrana 2012" . "2012-09-05+02:00"^^ . "Vysok\u00E1 \u0161kola b\u00E1\u0148sk\u00E1 - Technick\u00E1 univerzita Ostrava" . . . "145511" . "KONTROLN\u00CD SEZNAMY PRO OBLAST PO\u017D\u00C1RN\u00CD OCHRANY - vhodn\u00E9 hodnotov\u00E9 stupnice" . "Proch\u00E1zka, Jan" . . "CHECKLISTS FOR FIRE PROTECTION - Appropriate Qualitative Scales"@en . . "Risk assessment; Risk management; Checklist; Security"@en . . . . "21260" . . . "1"^^ .