. "000282675400009" . . "46" . "4"^^ . . . "8" . "Bure\u0161ov\u00E1, Dalia" . "Evaluation of the STORM model storm-time corrections for middle latitude"@en . . . . "0273-1177" . "Evaluation of the STORM model storm-time corrections for middle latitude" . "McKinnell, L.- A." . "GB - Spojen\u00E9 kr\u00E1lovstv\u00ED Velk\u00E9 Brit\u00E1nie a Severn\u00EDho Irska" . . . "Advances in Space Research" . "Evaluation of the STORM model storm-time corrections for middle latitude"@en . "\u0160indel\u00E1\u0159ov\u00E1, Tereza" . "Evaluation of the STORM model storm-time corrections for middle latitude" . "This paper presents results from the Storm-Time Ionospheric Correction Model (STORM) validation for selected Northern and Southern Hemisphere middle latitude locations. This validation included data from some ionospheric stations (e.g., Pruhonice, El Arenosillo) that were not considered in the development or previous validations of the model. Hourly values of the F2 layer critical frequency, foF2, measured for 5\u20137 days during the main and recovery phases of each selected storm were compared with the predicted IRI 2007 foF2 with the STORM model option activated. To perform a detailed comparison the correlation coefficient, the RMSE, and the percentage improvement were calculated. Results of the comparative analysis show that the STORM model captures more effectively the negative phases of the summer ionospheric storms, while electron density enhancement during winter storms and the changeover of the different storm phases is reproduced with less accuracy."@en . "RIV/68378289:_____/10:00348460!RIV11-GA0-68378289" . "8"^^ . . "257934" . . "de la Morena, B. A." . "This paper presents results from the Storm-Time Ionospheric Correction Model (STORM) validation for selected Northern and Southern Hemisphere middle latitude locations. This validation included data from some ionospheric stations (e.g., Pruhonice, El Arenosillo) that were not considered in the development or previous validations of the model. Hourly values of the F2 layer critical frequency, foF2, measured for 5\u20137 days during the main and recovery phases of each selected storm were compared with the predicted IRI 2007 foF2 with the STORM model option activated. To perform a detailed comparison the correlation coefficient, the RMSE, and the percentage improvement were calculated. Results of the comparative analysis show that the STORM model captures more effectively the negative phases of the summer ionospheric storms, while electron density enhancement during winter storms and the changeover of the different storm phases is reproduced with less accuracy." . "P(1QS300120506), P(GA205/08/1356), Z(AV0Z30420517)" . . . . . "[36176AB17172]" . . . "Ionosphere; Geomagnetic storms; STORM model; International Reference Ionosphere (IRI)"@en . . . "2"^^ . . "RIV/68378289:_____/10:00348460" .