. . . "P\u0159\u00EDsp\u011Bvek se zab\u00FDv\u00E1 t\u00E9matem mluvenost \u2013 psanost z pohledu stylistick\u00E9ho; v t\u00E9to souvislosti je v\u011Bnov\u00E1na pozornost n\u011Bkter\u00FDm stylistick\u00FDm pojm\u016Fm-term\u00EDn\u016Fm, kter\u00E9 se v dne\u0161n\u00ED dob\u011B jev\u00ED jako sporn\u00E9 nebo vy\u017Eaduj\u00ED ur\u010Ditou revizi. Reaguje mj. na ned\u00E1vno vydanou z\u00E1va\u017Enou polskou publikaci Kordiana Baku\u0142y M\u00F3wione pisane: komunikacja, j\u0119zyk, tekst (2008) a p\u0159ikl\u00E1n\u00ED se k ch\u00E1p\u00E1n\u00ED mluvenosti a psanosti jako dvou rozd\u00EDln\u00FDch styl\u016F. Rozbor psan\u00E9 a mluven\u00E9 verze t\u00E9ho\u017E p\u0159\u00EDb\u011Bhu, kter\u00FD vypr\u00E1v\u00ED tat\u00E1\u017E osoba, je zam\u011B\u0159en zejm\u00E9na na odli\u0161nosti v syntaktick\u00E9 v\u00FDstavb\u011B; slou\u017E\u00ED jako argument pro tvrzen\u00ED, \u017Ee mluvenou a psanou \u010De\u0161tinu nelze ch\u00E1pat jako dva odli\u0161n\u00E9 jazyky, s odli\u0161n\u00FDm reperto\u00E1rem syntaktick\u00FDch struktur nebo gramatick\u00FDch prost\u0159edk\u016F. Ob\u011B verze vypravov\u00E1n\u00ED se sice v\u00FDrazn\u011B a mnohostrann\u011B li\u0161\u00ED \u2013 ale celkov\u00FDm zabarven\u00EDm, atmosf\u00E9rou, \u010Dili nejsp\u00ED\u0161e stylem. Mluvenost a psanost jsou d\u00E1le uv\u00E1d\u011Bny do vztahu k pojm\u016Fm z oblasti typologie styl\u016F. K. Hausenblas (1973) pova\u017Eoval styl mluven\u00FDch a psan\u00FDch projev\u016F za styly simplexn\u00ED. Hodil by se pro n\u011B mo\u017En\u00E1 term\u00EDn makrostyl, kter\u00FD je ov\u0161em ve slovn\u00EDku Ko\u017Einov\u00E9 ad. (2003) p\u0159i\u0159azen styl\u016Fm funk\u010Dn\u00EDm. Z funk\u010Dn\u00EDch styl\u016F se \u0161iroce ch\u00E1pan\u00E9mu \u201Estylu mluven\u00E9mu\u201C nejv\u00EDc bl\u00ED\u017E\u00ED styl hovorov\u00FD (prost\u011B sd\u011Blovac\u00ED, b\u011B\u017En\u011B mluven\u00FD, kolokvi\u00E1ln\u00ED), v pol\u0161tin\u011B potoczny, v ru\u0161tin\u011B razgovornyj. Nelze ov\u0161em jednozna\u010Dn\u011B k sob\u011B p\u0159i\u0159adit styl a ur\u010Dit\u00FD realiza\u010Dn\u00ED \u00FAtvar, varietu jazyka; a n\u011Bkam mezi styl a \u00FAtvar (varietu) odkazuje z\u0159ejm\u011B pojem registr. Komplikovan\u00E9 je z tohoto hlediska i vymezen\u00ED pojm\u016F idiolekt (m\u00E1 bl\u00EDzko k individu\u00E1ln\u00EDmu stylu) a sociolekt (m\u00E1 bl\u00ED\u017Ee k jazykov\u00E9 variet\u011B); n\u011Bkdy se rozli\u0161uje nap\u0159. idiolekt a idiostyl. P\u0159edstava mluven\u00E9ho a psan\u00E9ho stylu je z\u0159ejm\u011B v souladu s p\u0159edstavou konceptu\u00E1ln\u00ED psanosti a mluvenosti (na rozd\u00EDl od medi\u00E1ln\u00ED; srov. Raible 1994). Z\u00E1v\u011Br p\u0159\u00EDsp\u011Bvku pak obsahuje je\u0161t\u011B \u00FAvahu o tom, zda podstatou stylu je skute\u010Dn\u011B z\u00E1m\u011Brnost (z\u00E1m\u011Brn\u00FD v\u00FDb\u011Br prost\u0159edk\u016F a zp\u016Fsob\u016F jejich organizace v textu)." . "This contribution deals with the topic of the spoken and the written from the perspective of stylistics; in this context, attention is devoted to some stylistic concepts which currently appear to be controversial or require some revision. It reacts, among others, to the recently published Polish publication by Kordian Baku\u0142a M\u00F3wione pisane: komunikacja, j\u0119zyk, tekst (2008) [Spoken Written: Communication, Language, Text] and leans toward the understanding of the spoken and the written as two different styles. The analysis of the written and spoken versions of the same story, told by the same person, is oriented above all toward syntactic differences; it serves as an argument for the claim that spoken and written Czech cannot be understood as two different languages, with a differing repertoire of syntactic structures or grammatical means. Though both versions of the narration differ in many ways, they do so through their overall coloring, atmosphere \u2013 it means through their style. The idea of spoken and written style is likely in harmony with that of the conceptual written and spoken (as opposed to the medium-specific; cf. Raible 1994). The spoken and the written are further placed in a relationship to concepts from the area of typology of style. K. Hausenblas (1973) considered the style of spoken and written expression to be simplex styles. Perhaps the term macrostyle would be appropriate for them, though it is categorized among the functional styles in the dictionary by Ko\u017Eina et al (2003). Of the functional styles, the broadly understood \u201Cspoken style is closest to the Czech terms styl hovorov\u00FD (prost\u011B sd\u011Blovac\u00ED, b\u011B\u017En\u011B mluven\u00FD, kolokvi\u00E1ln\u00ED) [colloquial style, simple informative style, everyday spoken style], in Polish potoczny, in Russian razgovornyj. However, it is not possible to unambiguously connect style with a particular realized variety; also, the concept of register most likely refers to a point somewhere in between style and variety."@en . "222274" . "Pozice %22stylu mluven\u00E9ho%22 a %22stylu psan\u00E9ho%22 v klasifikaci styl\u016F" . . "The position of %22spoken style%22 and %22written style%22 in style classification"@en . "Pozice %22stylu mluven\u00E9ho%22 a %22stylu psan\u00E9ho%22 v klasifikaci styl\u016F"@cs . . "Pozice %22stylu mluven\u00E9ho%22 a %22stylu psan\u00E9ho%22 v klasifikaci styl\u016F" . "RIV/68378092:_____/11:00386186" . "P\u0159\u00EDsp\u011Bvek se zab\u00FDv\u00E1 t\u00E9matem mluvenost \u2013 psanost z pohledu stylistick\u00E9ho; v t\u00E9to souvislosti je v\u011Bnov\u00E1na pozornost n\u011Bkter\u00FDm stylistick\u00FDm pojm\u016Fm-term\u00EDn\u016Fm, kter\u00E9 se v dne\u0161n\u00ED dob\u011B jev\u00ED jako sporn\u00E9 nebo vy\u017Eaduj\u00ED ur\u010Ditou revizi. Reaguje mj. na ned\u00E1vno vydanou z\u00E1va\u017Enou polskou publikaci Kordiana Baku\u0142y M\u00F3wione pisane: komunikacja, j\u0119zyk, tekst (2008) a p\u0159ikl\u00E1n\u00ED se k ch\u00E1p\u00E1n\u00ED mluvenosti a psanosti jako dvou rozd\u00EDln\u00FDch styl\u016F. Rozbor psan\u00E9 a mluven\u00E9 verze t\u00E9ho\u017E p\u0159\u00EDb\u011Bhu, kter\u00FD vypr\u00E1v\u00ED tat\u00E1\u017E osoba, je zam\u011B\u0159en zejm\u00E9na na odli\u0161nosti v syntaktick\u00E9 v\u00FDstavb\u011B; slou\u017E\u00ED jako argument pro tvrzen\u00ED, \u017Ee mluvenou a psanou \u010De\u0161tinu nelze ch\u00E1pat jako dva odli\u0161n\u00E9 jazyky, s odli\u0161n\u00FDm reperto\u00E1rem syntaktick\u00FDch struktur nebo gramatick\u00FDch prost\u0159edk\u016F. Ob\u011B verze vypravov\u00E1n\u00ED se sice v\u00FDrazn\u011B a mnohostrann\u011B li\u0161\u00ED \u2013 ale celkov\u00FDm zabarven\u00EDm, atmosf\u00E9rou, \u010Dili nejsp\u00ED\u0161e stylem. Mluvenost a psanost jsou d\u00E1le uv\u00E1d\u011Bny do vztahu k pojm\u016Fm z oblasti typologie styl\u016F. K. Hausenblas (1973) pova\u017Eoval styl mluven\u00FDch a psan\u00FDch projev\u016F za styly simplexn\u00ED. Hodil by se pro n\u011B mo\u017En\u00E1 term\u00EDn makrostyl, kter\u00FD je ov\u0161em ve slovn\u00EDku Ko\u017Einov\u00E9 ad. (2003) p\u0159i\u0159azen styl\u016Fm funk\u010Dn\u00EDm. Z funk\u010Dn\u00EDch styl\u016F se \u0161iroce ch\u00E1pan\u00E9mu \u201Estylu mluven\u00E9mu\u201C nejv\u00EDc bl\u00ED\u017E\u00ED styl hovorov\u00FD (prost\u011B sd\u011Blovac\u00ED, b\u011B\u017En\u011B mluven\u00FD, kolokvi\u00E1ln\u00ED), v pol\u0161tin\u011B potoczny, v ru\u0161tin\u011B razgovornyj. Nelze ov\u0161em jednozna\u010Dn\u011B k sob\u011B p\u0159i\u0159adit styl a ur\u010Dit\u00FD realiza\u010Dn\u00ED \u00FAtvar, varietu jazyka; a n\u011Bkam mezi styl a \u00FAtvar (varietu) odkazuje z\u0159ejm\u011B pojem registr. Komplikovan\u00E9 je z tohoto hlediska i vymezen\u00ED pojm\u016F idiolekt (m\u00E1 bl\u00EDzko k individu\u00E1ln\u00EDmu stylu) a sociolekt (m\u00E1 bl\u00ED\u017Ee k jazykov\u00E9 variet\u011B); n\u011Bkdy se rozli\u0161uje nap\u0159. idiolekt a idiostyl. P\u0159edstava mluven\u00E9ho a psan\u00E9ho stylu je z\u0159ejm\u011B v souladu s p\u0159edstavou konceptu\u00E1ln\u00ED psanosti a mluvenosti (na rozd\u00EDl od medi\u00E1ln\u00ED; srov. Raible 1994). Z\u00E1v\u011Br p\u0159\u00EDsp\u011Bvku pak obsahuje je\u0161t\u011B \u00FAvahu o tom, zda podstatou stylu je skute\u010Dn\u011B z\u00E1m\u011Brnost (z\u00E1m\u011Brn\u00FD v\u00FDb\u011Br prost\u0159edk\u016F a zp\u016Fsob\u016F jejich organizace v textu)."@cs . . . "P(GA405/09/2028), Z(AV0Z90610518)" . "13"^^ . "Stylistyka" . "1" . . . . . "[2718C69921BB]" . . . "Pozice %22stylu mluven\u00E9ho%22 a %22stylu psan\u00E9ho%22 v klasifikaci styl\u016F"@cs . "20" . . . "The position of %22spoken style%22 and %22written style%22 in style classification"@en . "PL - Polsk\u00E1 republika" . . "1"^^ . "1"^^ . "1230-2287" . "Hoffmannov\u00E1, Jana" . . . "the spoken; the written; linguistic means; functional; complex; simplex styles"@en . . "RIV/68378092:_____/11:00386186!RIV13-AV0-68378092" . . .