"4" . . . "Diverzita \u010Di odli\u0161n\u00E9 chov\u00E1n\u00ED? Soci\u00E1ln\u00ED distance od Rom\u016F, gay\u016F, lid\u00ED s AIDS a dal\u0161\u00EDch men\u0161in"@cs . "Diversity or behavioral deviance? Social distance from Roma, gays, people with AIDS and other minorities"@en . . . "Diverzita \u010Di odli\u0161n\u00E9 chov\u00E1n\u00ED? Soci\u00E1ln\u00ED distance od Rom\u016F, gay\u016F, lid\u00ED s AIDS a dal\u0161\u00EDch men\u0161in" . "Diversity or behavioral deviance? Social distance from Roma, gays, people with AIDS and other minorities"@en . "Diverzita \u010Di odli\u0161n\u00E9 chov\u00E1n\u00ED? Soci\u00E1ln\u00ED distance od Rom\u016F, gay\u016F, lid\u00ED s AIDS a dal\u0161\u00EDch men\u0161in"@cs . "D\u016Fv\u011Bra a tolerance pat\u0159\u00ED k p\u0159edpoklad\u016Fm demokracie; identifikace latentn\u00EDch prom\u011Bnn\u00FDch v postoj\u00EDch m\u016F\u017Ee odkr\u00FDt zdroje tolerance a netolerance. Sekund\u00E1rn\u00ED anal\u00FDza Evropsk\u00E9 studie hodnot uk\u00E1zala podstatnou shodu v soci\u00E1ln\u00ED distanci od men\u0161in: Nejp\u0159ij\u00EDman\u011Bj\u0161\u00ED sousedy spojuje p\u0159edev\u0161\u00EDm etnick\u00E1 a n\u00E1bo\u017Eensk\u00E1 diverzita; nejodm\u00EDtan\u011Bj\u0161\u00ED skupiny charakterizuje chov\u00E1n\u00ED odli\u0161n\u00E9 od soci\u00E1ln\u00EDch norem (z\u00E1visl\u00ED na alkoholu a drog\u00E1ch, lid\u00E9 s krimin\u00E1ln\u00ED minulost\u00ED); p\u0159ij\u00EDm\u00E1n\u00ED dal\u0161\u00EDch ze \u010Dtrn\u00E1cti posuzovan\u00FDch skupin (Rom\u016F, gay\u016F, lid\u00ED s AIDS) bylo rozporn\u00E9. Faktorov\u00E1 anal\u00FDza i anal\u00FDza hlavn\u00EDch komponent\u016F, jak s \u0161ikm\u00FDmi tak i ortogon\u00E1ln\u00EDmi rotacemi, poskytly stabiln\u00ED \u0159e\u0161en\u00ED bl\u00ED\u017E\u00EDc\u00ED se jednoduch\u00E9 struktu\u0159e s t\u0159emi faktory: 1. Diverzita (etnick\u00E1 a n\u00E1bo\u017Eensk\u00E1 r\u016Fznorodost), 2. Deviace (odli\u0161nost chov\u00E1n\u00ED), 3. Politick\u00FD extremizmus. Obdobnost \u0159e\u0161en\u00ED z\u00EDskan\u00FDch z dat 3. vlny (N1999-2001 = 10.522) i o dek\u00E1du pozd\u011Bj\u0161\u00ED 4. vlny EVS (N2008-2010 = 13.719), kdy data byla sb\u00EDr\u00E1na jin\u00FDmi agenturami, potvrzuje spolehlivost v\u00FDsledk\u016F. K v\u00FDznamn\u00FDm zji\u0161t\u011Bn\u00EDm pat\u0159\u00ED, \u017Ee v\u011Bt\u0161\u00ED soci\u00E1ln\u00ED vzd\u00E1lenost respondent\u016F EVS od men\u0161in m\u00E1 vztah k vy\u0161\u0161\u00ED z\u00E1t\u011B\u017Ei t\u011Bchto men\u0161in v faktoru Deviace a naopak, men\u0161iny s vysokou z\u00E1t\u011B\u017E\u00ED v faktoru Diverzity jsou \u010Dast\u011Bji za sousedy p\u0159ij\u00EDm\u00E1ny. Men\u0161iny hodnocen\u00E9 ambivalentn\u011B se \u010Dasto tak\u00E9 ambivalentn\u011B objevuj\u00ED ve dvou faktorech (Diverzity i Deviace), a\u010D se faktorov\u00E1 struktura bl\u00ED\u017E\u00ED jednoduch\u00E9mu \u0159e\u0161en\u00ED. A tak maj\u00ED v\u00FDchodoevrop\u0161t\u00ED gayov\u00E9 a lid\u00E9 s AIDS krom\u011B zvl\u00E1\u0161t\u011B vysok\u00E9 z\u00E1t\u011B\u017Ee v faktoru Deviace i men\u0161\u00ED z\u00E1t\u011B\u017E v Diverzit\u011B; Romov\u00E9 maj\u00ED vysokou z\u00E1t\u011B\u017E v Diverzit\u011B a m\u00E9n\u011B vysokou v Deviaci. (Pro srovn\u00E1n\u00ED, gayov\u00E9 v \u010Cesk\u00E9 republice maj\u00ED vysokou z\u00E1t\u011B\u017E v Diverzit\u011B a men\u0161\u00ED v Deviaci; \u010De\u0161t\u00ED Romov\u00E9 a lid\u00E9 s AIDS sk\u00F3rovali ve star\u0161\u00ED vln\u011B vysoko v Diverzit\u011B, ale v nej\u010Derstv\u011Bj\u0161\u00ED vln\u011B maj\u00ED vysokou z\u00E1t\u011B\u017E v Deviaci). \u0160ikm\u00E1 \u0159e\u0161en\u00ED ukazuj\u00ED dal\u0161\u00ED souvislosti. V\u00FDsledky ilustruj\u00ED rozd\u00EDlnosti a nazna\u010Duj\u00ED sou\u010Dasn\u00FD v\u00FDvoj v postoj\u00EDch."@cs . "Klicperov\u00E1-Baker, Martina" . "\u010Ceskoslovensk\u00E1\u00A0psychologie" . "D\u016Fv\u011Bra a tolerance pat\u0159\u00ED k p\u0159edpoklad\u016Fm demokracie; identifikace latentn\u00EDch prom\u011Bnn\u00FDch v postoj\u00EDch m\u016F\u017Ee odkr\u00FDt zdroje tolerance a netolerance. Sekund\u00E1rn\u00ED anal\u00FDza Evropsk\u00E9 studie hodnot uk\u00E1zala podstatnou shodu v soci\u00E1ln\u00ED distanci od men\u0161in: Nejp\u0159ij\u00EDman\u011Bj\u0161\u00ED sousedy spojuje p\u0159edev\u0161\u00EDm etnick\u00E1 a n\u00E1bo\u017Eensk\u00E1 diverzita; nejodm\u00EDtan\u011Bj\u0161\u00ED skupiny charakterizuje chov\u00E1n\u00ED odli\u0161n\u00E9 od soci\u00E1ln\u00EDch norem (z\u00E1visl\u00ED na alkoholu a drog\u00E1ch, lid\u00E9 s krimin\u00E1ln\u00ED minulost\u00ED); p\u0159ij\u00EDm\u00E1n\u00ED dal\u0161\u00EDch ze \u010Dtrn\u00E1cti posuzovan\u00FDch skupin (Rom\u016F, gay\u016F, lid\u00ED s AIDS) bylo rozporn\u00E9. Faktorov\u00E1 anal\u00FDza i anal\u00FDza hlavn\u00EDch komponent\u016F, jak s \u0161ikm\u00FDmi tak i ortogon\u00E1ln\u00EDmi rotacemi, poskytly stabiln\u00ED \u0159e\u0161en\u00ED bl\u00ED\u017E\u00EDc\u00ED se jednoduch\u00E9 struktu\u0159e s t\u0159emi faktory: 1. Diverzita (etnick\u00E1 a n\u00E1bo\u017Eensk\u00E1 r\u016Fznorodost), 2. Deviace (odli\u0161nost chov\u00E1n\u00ED), 3. Politick\u00FD extremizmus. Obdobnost \u0159e\u0161en\u00ED z\u00EDskan\u00FDch z dat 3. vlny (N1999-2001 = 10.522) i o dek\u00E1du pozd\u011Bj\u0161\u00ED 4. vlny EVS (N2008-2010 = 13.719), kdy data byla sb\u00EDr\u00E1na jin\u00FDmi agenturami, potvrzuje spolehlivost v\u00FDsledk\u016F. K v\u00FDznamn\u00FDm zji\u0161t\u011Bn\u00EDm pat\u0159\u00ED, \u017Ee v\u011Bt\u0161\u00ED soci\u00E1ln\u00ED vzd\u00E1lenost respondent\u016F EVS od men\u0161in m\u00E1 vztah k vy\u0161\u0161\u00ED z\u00E1t\u011B\u017Ei t\u011Bchto men\u0161in v faktoru Deviace a naopak, men\u0161iny s vysokou z\u00E1t\u011B\u017E\u00ED v faktoru Diverzity jsou \u010Dast\u011Bji za sousedy p\u0159ij\u00EDm\u00E1ny. Men\u0161iny hodnocen\u00E9 ambivalentn\u011B se \u010Dasto tak\u00E9 ambivalentn\u011B objevuj\u00ED ve dvou faktorech (Diverzity i Deviace), a\u010D se faktorov\u00E1 struktura bl\u00ED\u017E\u00ED jednoduch\u00E9mu \u0159e\u0161en\u00ED. A tak maj\u00ED v\u00FDchodoevrop\u0161t\u00ED gayov\u00E9 a lid\u00E9 s AIDS krom\u011B zvl\u00E1\u0161t\u011B vysok\u00E9 z\u00E1t\u011B\u017Ee v faktoru Deviace i men\u0161\u00ED z\u00E1t\u011B\u017E v Diverzit\u011B; Romov\u00E9 maj\u00ED vysokou z\u00E1t\u011B\u017E v Diverzit\u011B a m\u00E9n\u011B vysokou v Deviaci. (Pro srovn\u00E1n\u00ED, gayov\u00E9 v \u010Cesk\u00E9 republice maj\u00ED vysokou z\u00E1t\u011B\u017E v Diverzit\u011B a men\u0161\u00ED v Deviaci; \u010De\u0161t\u00ED Romov\u00E9 a lid\u00E9 s AIDS sk\u00F3rovali ve star\u0161\u00ED vln\u011B vysoko v Diverzit\u011B, ale v nej\u010Derstv\u011Bj\u0161\u00ED vln\u011B maj\u00ED vysokou z\u00E1t\u011B\u017E v Deviaci). \u0160ikm\u00E1 \u0159e\u0161en\u00ED ukazuj\u00ED dal\u0161\u00ED souvislosti. V\u00FDsledky ilustruj\u00ED rozd\u00EDlnosti a nazna\u010Duj\u00ED sou\u010Dasn\u00FD v\u00FDvoj v postoj\u00EDch." . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . . "000309088900001" . "Z(AV0Z70250504)" . "RIV/68081740:_____/12:00379695!RIV13-AV0-68081740" . "[7E3B9C69F92A]" . "Ko\u0161\u0165\u00E1l, J." . "diversity; minorities; social distance"@en . . "Objectives. Heuristic study focused on common reasons for social distance from minorities and assumed that latent variables in attitudes can reveal the roots of intolerance, with a special attention to ambivalently accepted outgroups. Subjects and setting. A secondary analysis of answers to European Values Study (EVS 1999- 2010) was performed focusing on the Czech Republic alone and on Eastern European EU members (wave 3 N=10.522 and wave 4 N=13.719); responses to question Q6 (which minorities would be undesirable as neighbors). Hypotheses. Authors looked for a context in which out-groups are perceived, specifically for relationships a) between diversity and acceptance and b) between deviance and rejection of individual minority groups. Statistical analyses. Factor analyses and principal component analyses (both oblique and orthogonal rotations) based on Kaiser\u2019s criterion; Cronbach\u2019s alpha. Results. Respondents indicated consensus in social distance from minorities: the most accepted neighbors are defined mostly by ethnic or religious diversity; the most rejected groups are characterized by behavior deviant from social norms (addicts, criminals); there is a disagreement about admittance of the rest of the fourteen groups assessed (Roma, gays, AIDS patients). All factor analyses and principal component analyses yielded a stable solution close to a simple structure with three factors: 1. Diversity (ethnic, religious); 2. (Behavioral) Deviance; 3. Political extremism. Stronger social distancing from ethnic minorities and gays is related to higher minority loading on Deviance factor; conversely, minorities loading on Diversity factor tend to be accepted. Minorities who met with neighbors\u2019 ambivalence (especially Roma, gays, people with AIDS) often ambivalently appear in two factors (Diversity and Deviance). Study limitations. Methodology of Pearson\u2019s correlation matrices was used as a basis for factor analyses."@en . . . . "Diverzita \u010Di odli\u0161n\u00E9 chov\u00E1n\u00ED? Soci\u00E1ln\u00ED distance od Rom\u016F, gay\u016F, lid\u00ED s AIDS a dal\u0161\u00EDch men\u0161in" . . "0009-062X" . "131686" . . . . "1"^^ . "RIV/68081740:_____/12:00379695" . . . . "56" . "2"^^ . "17"^^ .