"Functional Activities Questionnaire, Czech version \u2013 a validation study"@en . "Validiza\u010Dn\u00ED studie \u010Desk\u00E9 verze dotazn\u00EDku FAQ" . "1210-7859" . "This article describes psychometric properties of Pfeffer\u2019s Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) for measurement of Activities of Daily Living (ADL) in older persons without cognitive impairment. FAQ and the neuropsychological battery was administered to 136 older persons (test) at baseline (self-report). Eighty-two of these older persons were followed at 6-month interval (retest) and they were also evaluated by their caregivers (informant-report). Age nor education have significant influence on the FAQ results. The relation of FAQ with performance in MMSE was not significant. There is a statistically significant relation between FAQ and the neuropsychological battery (particularly AVLT and Shopping list, but with low correlations). The difference between self- and informant report was statistically significant as well. These findings indicate that FAQ is a valid and reliable instrument for the measurement of ADL in older persons without cognitive impairment."@en . "Preiss, M." . "P(2D06013), V, Z(AV0Z70250504), Z(MZ0PCP2005)" . . . "Functional Activities Questionnaire, Czech version \u2013 a validation study"@en . "Validiza\u010Dn\u00ED studie \u010Desk\u00E9 verze dotazn\u00EDku FAQ"@cs . . . "3"^^ . . "[53AD5A1630F1]" . . "1"^^ . . "Bezd\u00ED\u010Dek, O." . . "Lukavsk\u00FD, Ji\u0159\u00ED" . "1" . "000287787700004" . "RIV/68081740:_____/11:00363767!RIV13-AV0-68081740" . "\u010Cesk\u00E1 a Slovensk\u00E1 neurologie a neurochirurgie" . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . "237850" . . . "C\u00EDlem bylo ov\u011B\u0159en\u00ED vlastnost\u00ED \u010Desk\u00E9 verze Pfefferova Dotazn\u00EDku funk\u010Dn\u00EDho stavu (FAQ) pro m\u011B\u0159en\u00ED aktivit denn\u00EDho \u017Eivota u star\u0161\u00EDch osob bez kognitivn\u00EDho deficitu. \u0160k\u00E1lu FAQ a neuropsychologickou baterii jsme v prvn\u00EDm m\u011B\u0159en\u00ED (test), administrovali celkem u 136 osob vy\u0161\u0161\u00EDho v\u011Bku (sebeposouzen\u00ED), v druh\u00E9m m\u011B\u0159en\u00ED 82 osob\u00E1m (retest) pouze FAQ a nechali tyto osoby posoudit pe\u010Dovatelem (objektivn\u00ED posouzen\u00ED). Vztah FAQ s neuropsychologickou bateri\u00ED, jmenovit\u011B pam\u011B\u0165ov\u00FDmi testy AVLT a N\u00E1kupn\u00ED seznam byl statisticky v\u00FDznamn\u00FD, v\u00FD\u0161e korelac\u00ED je ale v\u017Edy n\u00EDzk\u00E1. Mezi prvn\u00EDm m\u011B\u0159en\u00EDm FAQ a retestem po \u0161esti m\u011Bs\u00EDc\u00EDch nebyl statisticky v\u00FDznamn\u00FD rozd\u00EDl. V\u011Bk ani vzd\u011Bl\u00E1n\u00ED nemaj\u00ED v\u00FDznamn\u00FD vliv na v\u00FDsledky v FAQ. Pohlav\u00ED m\u00E1 statisticky v\u00FDznamn\u00FD vliv (sebeposouzen\u00ED). Vztah FAQ s celkovou kognitivn\u00ED v\u00FDkonnost\u00ED (MMSE) byl statisticky nev\u00FDznamn\u00FD. Rozd\u00EDl mezi sebeposouzen\u00EDm a posouzen\u00EDm pe\u010Duj\u00EDc\u00ED osobou byl statisticky v\u00FDznamn\u00FD. \u0160k\u00E1la FAQ je platn\u00FD a spolehliv\u00FD n\u00E1stroj hodnocen\u00ED ADL u osob vy\u0161\u0161\u00EDho v\u011Bku."@cs . . "Validiza\u010Dn\u00ED studie \u010Desk\u00E9 verze dotazn\u00EDku FAQ" . . . . "7"^^ . . "questionnaire; validity; activities of daily living"@en . . "C\u00EDlem bylo ov\u011B\u0159en\u00ED vlastnost\u00ED \u010Desk\u00E9 verze Pfefferova Dotazn\u00EDku funk\u010Dn\u00EDho stavu (FAQ) pro m\u011B\u0159en\u00ED aktivit denn\u00EDho \u017Eivota u star\u0161\u00EDch osob bez kognitivn\u00EDho deficitu. \u0160k\u00E1lu FAQ a neuropsychologickou baterii jsme v prvn\u00EDm m\u011B\u0159en\u00ED (test), administrovali celkem u 136 osob vy\u0161\u0161\u00EDho v\u011Bku (sebeposouzen\u00ED), v druh\u00E9m m\u011B\u0159en\u00ED 82 osob\u00E1m (retest) pouze FAQ a nechali tyto osoby posoudit pe\u010Dovatelem (objektivn\u00ED posouzen\u00ED). Vztah FAQ s neuropsychologickou bateri\u00ED, jmenovit\u011B pam\u011B\u0165ov\u00FDmi testy AVLT a N\u00E1kupn\u00ED seznam byl statisticky v\u00FDznamn\u00FD, v\u00FD\u0161e korelac\u00ED je ale v\u017Edy n\u00EDzk\u00E1. Mezi prvn\u00EDm m\u011B\u0159en\u00EDm FAQ a retestem po \u0161esti m\u011Bs\u00EDc\u00EDch nebyl statisticky v\u00FDznamn\u00FD rozd\u00EDl. V\u011Bk ani vzd\u011Bl\u00E1n\u00ED nemaj\u00ED v\u00FDznamn\u00FD vliv na v\u00FDsledky v FAQ. Pohlav\u00ED m\u00E1 statisticky v\u00FDznamn\u00FD vliv (sebeposouzen\u00ED). Vztah FAQ s celkovou kognitivn\u00ED v\u00FDkonnost\u00ED (MMSE) byl statisticky nev\u00FDznamn\u00FD. Rozd\u00EDl mezi sebeposouzen\u00EDm a posouzen\u00EDm pe\u010Duj\u00EDc\u00ED osobou byl statisticky v\u00FDznamn\u00FD. \u0160k\u00E1la FAQ je platn\u00FD a spolehliv\u00FD n\u00E1stroj hodnocen\u00ED ADL u osob vy\u0161\u0161\u00EDho v\u011Bku." . . "RIV/68081740:_____/11:00363767" . . "Validiza\u010Dn\u00ED studie \u010Desk\u00E9 verze dotazn\u00EDku FAQ"@cs . "74/107" . . .