"3"^^ . "3"^^ . "[A648DA3965BA]" . . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . "Osobnost jako prediktor osobn\u00ED pohody v dosp\u011Blosti" . "RIV/68081740:_____/10:00349173!RIV11-AV0-68081740" . "\u010Ceskoslovensk\u00E1\u00A0psychologie" . . . "Personality as a predictor of subjective well-being in adulthood"@en . "RIV/68081740:_____/10:00349173" . . . . "10"^^ . "Blatn\u00FD, Marek" . "277621" . "54" . "Osobnost jako prediktor osobn\u00ED pohody v dosp\u011Blosti"@cs . . . . "P(IAA700250702), Z(AV0Z70250504)" . . . . "1" . "The study examines relations between personality traits (N, E, O, A,C) and subjective well-being. Two groups participated in the study: university students (N = 2317) and adults in age 40-83 years (N = 196). Regression analysis showed that four personality traits predict well-being in the group of university students (in the order N, C, E, A), whereas in the group of adults only two personality traits predicted well-being (N, E). We found different number of well-being predictors in men and women in both groups. In the group of female university students, subjective well-being was predicted by the same traits as mentioned above, whereas in male university students, Agreeableness was missing. Neuroticism was the only predictor of well-being in the group of adult men, whereas in the group of adult women neuroticism did not appear as a predictor of well-being. In this latter group, the strongest predictor of well-being was Extraversion, followed by Conscientiousness and Agreeableness."@en . . "H\u0159eb\u00ED\u010Dkov\u00E1, Martina" . . . . "000282805700003" . "of subjective well-being; five-factor model; gender differences"@en . "0009-062X" . "Studie se zab\u00FDv\u00E1 vztahem osobnostn\u00EDch charakteristik p\u011Btifaktorov\u00E9ho modelu osobnosti (N, E, O, P, S) a osobn\u00ED pohody. V\u00FDzkumu se \u00FA\u010Dastnily dv\u011B skupiny respondent\u016F: vysoko\u0161kol\u00E1ci (N = 2317) a dosp\u011Bl\u00ED ve v\u011Bku 40-83 let (N = 196). Na z\u00E1klad\u011B krokov\u00E9 regresn\u00ED anal\u00FDzy jsme zjistili, \u017Ee se na predikci osobn\u00ED pohody u vysoko\u0161kol\u00E1k\u016F pod\u00EDlej\u00ED \u010Dty\u0159i osobnostn\u00ED vlastnosti (v po\u0159ad\u00ED N, S, E, P), kde\u017Eto u dosp\u011Bl\u00FDch pouze dv\u011B (v po\u0159ad\u00ED N, E). Zaznamenali jsme odli\u0161n\u00FD po\u010Det prediktor\u016F osobn\u00ED pohody u \u017Een a mu\u017E\u016F v obou sledovan\u00FDch skupin\u00E1ch. U vysoko\u0161kola\u010Dek se na predikci osobn\u00ED pohody pod\u00EDlej\u00ED ve stejn\u00E9m po\u0159ad\u00ED v\u00FD\u0161e uveden\u00E9 \u010Dty\u0159i osobnostn\u00ED vlastnosti, kde\u017Eto u vysoko\u0161kol\u00E1k\u016F chyb\u00ED p\u0159\u00EDv\u011Btivost. Ve skupin\u011B dosp\u011Bl\u00FDch mu\u017E\u016F je neuroticismus jedin\u00FDm prediktorem osobn\u00ED pohody. U dosp\u011Bl\u00FDch \u017Een se v\u0161ak na predikci osobn\u00ED pohody neuroticismus nepod\u00EDl\u00ED v\u016Fbec. V t\u00E9to skupin\u011B je nejsiln\u011Bj\u0161\u00EDm prediktorem osobn\u00ED pohody extraverze, n\u00E1sleduje sv\u011Bdomitost a p\u0159\u00EDv\u011Btivost." . "Jel\u00EDnek, Martin" . . "Osobnost jako prediktor osobn\u00ED pohody v dosp\u011Blosti" . "Personality as a predictor of subjective well-being in adulthood"@en . . "Osobnost jako prediktor osobn\u00ED pohody v dosp\u011Blosti"@cs . . "Studie se zab\u00FDv\u00E1 vztahem osobnostn\u00EDch charakteristik p\u011Btifaktorov\u00E9ho modelu osobnosti (N, E, O, P, S) a osobn\u00ED pohody. V\u00FDzkumu se \u00FA\u010Dastnily dv\u011B skupiny respondent\u016F: vysoko\u0161kol\u00E1ci (N = 2317) a dosp\u011Bl\u00ED ve v\u011Bku 40-83 let (N = 196). Na z\u00E1klad\u011B krokov\u00E9 regresn\u00ED anal\u00FDzy jsme zjistili, \u017Ee se na predikci osobn\u00ED pohody u vysoko\u0161kol\u00E1k\u016F pod\u00EDlej\u00ED \u010Dty\u0159i osobnostn\u00ED vlastnosti (v po\u0159ad\u00ED N, S, E, P), kde\u017Eto u dosp\u011Bl\u00FDch pouze dv\u011B (v po\u0159ad\u00ED N, E). Zaznamenali jsme odli\u0161n\u00FD po\u010Det prediktor\u016F osobn\u00ED pohody u \u017Een a mu\u017E\u016F v obou sledovan\u00FDch skupin\u00E1ch. U vysoko\u0161kola\u010Dek se na predikci osobn\u00ED pohody pod\u00EDlej\u00ED ve stejn\u00E9m po\u0159ad\u00ED v\u00FD\u0161e uveden\u00E9 \u010Dty\u0159i osobnostn\u00ED vlastnosti, kde\u017Eto u vysoko\u0161kol\u00E1k\u016F chyb\u00ED p\u0159\u00EDv\u011Btivost. Ve skupin\u011B dosp\u011Bl\u00FDch mu\u017E\u016F je neuroticismus jedin\u00FDm prediktorem osobn\u00ED pohody. U dosp\u011Bl\u00FDch \u017Een se v\u0161ak na predikci osobn\u00ED pohody neuroticismus nepod\u00EDl\u00ED v\u016Fbec. V t\u00E9to skupin\u011B je nejsiln\u011Bj\u0161\u00EDm prediktorem osobn\u00ED pohody extraverze, n\u00E1sleduje sv\u011Bdomitost a p\u0159\u00EDv\u011Btivost."@cs .