. "62" . . . "22"^^ . "1"^^ . . . "Parusnikov\u00E1, Zuzana" . "Skepticismus a fideismus. Montaigne a Hume" . "45164" . "1"^^ . "Skepticismus a fideismus. Montaigne a Hume" . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . . . . . "Skepticismus a fideismus. Montaigne a Hume"@cs . . "Scepticism and Fideism. Motaigne and Hume"@en . . "RIV/67985955:_____/14:00427215" . "I" . "[39E5BB3038BB]" . "O\u017Eiven\u00ED pyrrh\u00F3nsk\u00E9ho skepticismu v evropsk\u00E9m my\u0161len\u00ED 17. stolet\u00ED v\u00FDznamn\u011B ovlivnilo nejen dal\u0161\u00ED v\u00FDvoj epistemologie ale i oblast teologie. Skeptick\u00E9 pop\u0159en\u00ED legitimity racion\u00E1ln\u00EDho usuzov\u00E1n\u00ED zas\u00E1hlo i legitimitu tradi\u010Dn\u00EDch argument\u016F bo\u017E\u00ED existence. Snaha 'zachr\u00E1nit Boha' vy\u00FAstila do fideismu, ve kter\u00E9m je v\u00EDra odsunuta do sf\u00E9ry nitern\u00E9ho pro\u017Eitku, prosycen\u00E9ho tajemnost\u00ED. K hlavn\u00EDm propag\u00E1tor\u016Fm pyrrhonismu i p\u0159edstavitel\u016Fm fideistick\u00E9ho obratu pat\u0159il Montaigne. Nemohli bychom u Huma uva\u017Eovat o podobn\u00E9 strategii? Hume p\u0159ijal racion\u00E1ln\u00ED ne\u0159e\u0161itelnost epistemologick\u00E9ho skepticismu a vedle n\u011Bj postavil pozitivn\u00ED pil\u00ED\u0159 pozn\u00E1n\u00ED, spo\u010D\u00EDva j\u00EDc\u00ED v lidsk\u00E9 p\u0159irozenosti. Analogicky by mohl k n\u00E1bo\u017Eensk\u00E9 skepsi zvolit protip\u00F3l v soukrom\u00E9 v\u00ED\u0159e v srdci, p\u0159\u00EDpadn\u011B ji uznat jako p\u0159irozenou pot\u0159ebu lidsk\u00E9ho \u017Eivota. Autorka p\u0159i zkoum\u00E1n\u00ED t\u011Bchto probl\u00E9m\u016F vych\u00E1z\u00ED p\u0159edev\u0161\u00EDm z Humov\u00FDch Dialog\u016F a doch\u00E1z\u00ED k z\u00E1v\u011Bru, \u017Ee \u2013 na rozd\u00EDl od Bayla \u2013 se Hume ji\u017E pln\u011B pohybuje na osv\u00EDcensk\u00E9 p\u016Fd\u011B, kde n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED i v jeho nitern\u00E9 form\u011B pat\u0159\u00ED do star\u00FDch 'temn\u00FDch' \u010Das\u016F." . "1" . "Hume; Montaigne; scepticism; fideism; true religion"@en . "0015-1831" . . . "Scepticism and Fideism. Motaigne and Hume"@en . "O\u017Eiven\u00ED pyrrh\u00F3nsk\u00E9ho skepticismu v evropsk\u00E9m my\u0161len\u00ED 17. stolet\u00ED v\u00FDznamn\u011B ovlivnilo nejen dal\u0161\u00ED v\u00FDvoj epistemologie ale i oblast teologie. Skeptick\u00E9 pop\u0159en\u00ED legitimity racion\u00E1ln\u00EDho usuzov\u00E1n\u00ED zas\u00E1hlo i legitimitu tradi\u010Dn\u00EDch argument\u016F bo\u017E\u00ED existence. Snaha 'zachr\u00E1nit Boha' vy\u00FAstila do fideismu, ve kter\u00E9m je v\u00EDra odsunuta do sf\u00E9ry nitern\u00E9ho pro\u017Eitku, prosycen\u00E9ho tajemnost\u00ED. K hlavn\u00EDm propag\u00E1tor\u016Fm pyrrhonismu i p\u0159edstavitel\u016Fm fideistick\u00E9ho obratu pat\u0159il Montaigne. Nemohli bychom u Huma uva\u017Eovat o podobn\u00E9 strategii? Hume p\u0159ijal racion\u00E1ln\u00ED ne\u0159e\u0161itelnost epistemologick\u00E9ho skepticismu a vedle n\u011Bj postavil pozitivn\u00ED pil\u00ED\u0159 pozn\u00E1n\u00ED, spo\u010D\u00EDva j\u00EDc\u00ED v lidsk\u00E9 p\u0159irozenosti. Analogicky by mohl k n\u00E1bo\u017Eensk\u00E9 skepsi zvolit protip\u00F3l v soukrom\u00E9 v\u00ED\u0159e v srdci, p\u0159\u00EDpadn\u011B ji uznat jako p\u0159irozenou pot\u0159ebu lidsk\u00E9ho \u017Eivota. Autorka p\u0159i zkoum\u00E1n\u00ED t\u011Bchto probl\u00E9m\u016F vych\u00E1z\u00ED p\u0159edev\u0161\u00EDm z Humov\u00FDch Dialog\u016F a doch\u00E1z\u00ED k z\u00E1v\u011Bru, \u017Ee \u2013 na rozd\u00EDl od Bayla \u2013 se Hume ji\u017E pln\u011B pohybuje na osv\u00EDcensk\u00E9 p\u016Fd\u011B, kde n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED i v jeho nitern\u00E9 form\u011B pat\u0159\u00ED do star\u00FDch 'temn\u00FDch' \u010Das\u016F."@cs . . "Skepticismus a fideismus. Montaigne a Hume"@cs . "Filosofick\u00FD \u010Dasopis" . "RIV/67985955:_____/14:00427215!RIV15-AV0-67985955" . . . "The revival of Pyrrhonian scepticism in European thought of the 17th century had a significant influence not only on the further development of epistemology, but also on the sphere of theology. Sceptical denial of the legitimacy of rational judgement affected even the legitimacy of traditional arguments for God's existence. The attempt to 'save God' led to fideism in which faith is transferred to the sphere of inner experience, and is fraught with mystery. One of the main propagators of Pyrrhonism, and representatives of the fideistic turn, was Montaigne. What about Hume? Do we not find a similar strategy here too? After all, Hume accepted the irresolvability of epistemological scepticism by rational means, and he founded the positive structure of knowledge on human nature instead. Analogically, he might be inclined to go for the opposite pole of religious scepticism by endorsing the private faith of the heart, and he might perhaps even recognise this as a natural need in human life. The author, in her investigation of these questions, treats above all of Hume's Dialogues and she arrives at the conclusion that Hume - in contrast to his predecessor Bayle-is perfectly devoted to an enlightened world where religion, especially in its fideistic form, belongs to the old time of 'darkness'."@en . "000333543800003" .