"57" . . . "Materie a nemateri\u00E1ln\u00ED substance podle Bonaventury a Tom\u00E1\u0161e Akvinsk\u00E9ho"@cs . "\u010Cl\u00E1nek se zab\u00FDv\u00E1 Bonaventurov\u00FDm pojet\u00EDm prvn\u00ED materie v kontextu nemateri\u00E1ln\u00EDch substanc\u00ED. Bonaventurovo pojet\u00ED materie se odli\u0161uje od pojet\u00ED Aristotelova nebo Tom\u00E1\u0161ova, kte\u0159\u00ED v materii z nemateri\u00E1ln\u00EDch substanc\u00ED vylu\u010Duj\u00ED. Na rozd\u00EDl od Tom\u00E1\u0161e pou\u017E\u00EDv\u00E1 Bonaventura aristotelskou terminologii velmi voln\u011B a interpretuje materii jako potencialitu \u010Di p\u0159esn\u011Bji \u0159e\u010Deno jako znak stvo\u0159enosti. S t\u00EDmto p\u0159edpokladem nen\u00ED koncepce materie v nemateri\u00E1ln\u00EDch substanc\u00EDch u\u017E tak nesmysln\u00E1, jak by se na prvn\u00ED pohled mohla zd\u00E1t. \u010Cl\u00E1nek rozeb\u00EDr\u00E1 Bonaventurovo ch\u00E1p\u00E1n\u00ED and\u011Bl\u016F a lid\u00ED a srovn\u00E1v\u00E1 ho s pojet\u00EDm Tom\u00E1\u0161ov\u00FDm, v\u010Detn\u011B zp\u016Fsobu pou\u017Eit\u00ED aristotelsk\u00E9 terminologie." . "Filosofick\u00FD \u010Dasopis" . "Materie a nemateri\u00E1ln\u00ED substance podle Bonaventury a Tom\u00E1\u0161e Akvinsk\u00E9ho"@cs . "Matter and Immaterial Substances according to Bonaventure and Thomas Aquinas"@en . "\u010Cl\u00E1nek se zab\u00FDv\u00E1 Bonaventurov\u00FDm pojet\u00EDm prvn\u00ED materie v kontextu nemateri\u00E1ln\u00EDch substanc\u00ED. Bonaventurovo pojet\u00ED materie se odli\u0161uje od pojet\u00ED Aristotelova nebo Tom\u00E1\u0161ova, kte\u0159\u00ED v materii z nemateri\u00E1ln\u00EDch substanc\u00ED vylu\u010Duj\u00ED. Na rozd\u00EDl od Tom\u00E1\u0161e pou\u017E\u00EDv\u00E1 Bonaventura aristotelskou terminologii velmi voln\u011B a interpretuje materii jako potencialitu \u010Di p\u0159esn\u011Bji \u0159e\u010Deno jako znak stvo\u0159enosti. S t\u00EDmto p\u0159edpokladem nen\u00ED koncepce materie v nemateri\u00E1ln\u00EDch substanc\u00EDch u\u017E tak nesmysln\u00E1, jak by se na prvn\u00ED pohled mohla zd\u00E1t. \u010Cl\u00E1nek rozeb\u00EDr\u00E1 Bonaventurovo ch\u00E1p\u00E1n\u00ED and\u011Bl\u016F a lid\u00ED a srovn\u00E1v\u00E1 ho s pojet\u00EDm Tom\u00E1\u0161ov\u00FDm, v\u010Detn\u011B zp\u016Fsobu pou\u017Eit\u00ED aristotelsk\u00E9 terminologie."@cs . "Materie a nemateri\u00E1ln\u00ED substance podle Bonaventury a Tom\u00E1\u0161e Akvinsk\u00E9ho" . . "12"^^ . "[FE352733DE8B]" . "RIV/67985955:_____/09:00332390" . . . . "0015-1831" . . . "324901" . . "Z(AV0Z90090514)" . . . . "Materie a nemateri\u00E1ln\u00ED substance podle Bonaventury a Tom\u00E1\u0161e Akvinsk\u00E9ho" . "1"^^ . "RIV/67985955:_____/09:00332390!RIV10-AV0-67985955" . . "Aquinas; Bonaventure; matter; immaterial substances"@en . "The article is concerned with Bonaventure's conception of first matter in the context of immaterial substances. Bonaventure\u2019s conception of matter is different to that of Aristotle or Thomas Aquinas, who rejected matter in immaterial substances. Bonaventura, in contrast to Thomas, accepts the Aristotelian terminology in a fairly loose way, interpreting matter as potential, or more precisely, as the created. With this conception the assertion of matter in the context of immaterial beings is not so absurd as it may at first sight seem. The article analyses Bonaventure's understanding of angel and man, and it compares him with Thomas Aquinas and his use of Aristotelian terminology."@en . . "Machula, Tom\u00E1\u0161" . . "2" . . "Matter and Immaterial Substances according to Bonaventure and Thomas Aquinas"@en . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . "1"^^ .