. "Celesti-Grapow, L." . "P(LC06073), Z(AV0Z60050516), Z(MSM0021620828)" . "17" . "Distance decay of similarity among European urban floras: the impact of anthropogenic activities on beta diversity" . "Klotz, S." . . "3" . "Rapson, G. L." . . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . . . . "9"^^ . "Distance decay of similarity among European urban floras: the impact of anthropogenic activities on beta diversity"@en . "Podobnost mezi evropsk\u00FDmi m\u011Bstsk\u00FDmi fl\u00F3rami vyzn\u00EDv\u00E1 se vzd\u00E1lenost\u00ED: vliv \u010Dinnosti \u010Dlov\u011Bka na beta diverzitu"@cs . "Distance decay of similarity among European urban floras: the impact of anthropogenic activities on beta diversity"@en . "Podobnost mezi evropsk\u00FDmi m\u011Bstsk\u00FDmi fl\u00F3rami vyzn\u00EDv\u00E1 se vzd\u00E1lenost\u00ED: vliv \u010Dinnosti \u010Dlov\u011Bka na beta diverzitu"@cs . "7"^^ . "McKinney, M. L." . "[E0812B143530]" . "Thompson, K." . "Distance decay of similarity among European urban floras: the impact of anthropogenic activities on beta diversity" . "We examine how two categories of non-native species (archaeophyte and neophyte) have had different impacts on diversity across European urban floras. Relative to native species, across urban floras, archaeophytes were associated with higher compositional similarity and weaker distance decay patterns, whereas neophytes were associated with lower compositional similarity and stronger distance decay patterns. Across European urban floras, archaeophytes and neophytes occurred in similar numbers but archaeophytes were consistently associated with lower beta diversity and neophytes with higher beta diversity. Thus, the impact of non-native species on beta diversity can be determined through their historical and geographical associations with anthropogenic activities. If archaeophytes represent the long-term biogeographical outcome for human commensal species, neophytes could develop similar patterns."@en . . . . . "RIV/67985939:_____/08:00313699!RIV09-AV0-67985939" . "We examine how two categories of non-native species (archaeophyte and neophyte) have had different impacts on diversity across European urban floras. Relative to native species, across urban floras, archaeophytes were associated with higher compositional similarity and weaker distance decay patterns, whereas neophytes were associated with lower compositional similarity and stronger distance decay patterns. Across European urban floras, archaeophytes and neophytes occurred in similar numbers but archaeophytes were consistently associated with lower beta diversity and neophytes with higher beta diversity. Thus, the impact of non-native species on beta diversity can be determined through their historical and geographical associations with anthropogenic activities. If archaeophytes represent the long-term biogeographical outcome for human commensal species, neophytes could develop similar patterns." . "363855" . . "La Sorte, F. A." . "000254948700006" . "Global Ecology and Biogeography" . . . . . . "1"^^ . "1466-822X" . "Pr\u00E1ce zji\u0161\u0165uje, zda maj\u00ED archeofyty a neofyty rozd\u00EDln\u00FD dopad na beta diverzitu. V\u00FDskyt archeofyt\u016F zvy\u0161uje floristickou podobnost mezi m\u011Bsty, kter\u00E1 pomaleji kles\u00E1 s jejich vz\u00E1jemnou vzd\u00E1lenost\u00ED, ne\u017E je tomu u neofyt\u016F. Vliv nep\u016Fvodn\u00EDch druh\u016F na beta diverzitu je ur\u010Dov\u00E1n m\u00EDrou historick\u00E9ho a geografick\u00E9ho sep\u011Bt\u00ED s \u010Dinnost\u00ED \u010Dlov\u011Bka. Neofyty, na rozd\u00EDl od archeofyt\u016F, je\u0161t\u011B nedos\u00E1hly pln\u00E9ho potenci\u00E1ln\u00EDho roz\u0161\u00ED\u0159en\u00ED, proto evropsk\u00E1 m\u011Bsta host\u00ED jejich vz\u00E1jemn\u011B dosti odli\u0161n\u00E9 druhov\u00E9 soubory."@cs . "Py\u0161ek, Petr" . "urban floras; biotic homogenization; beta diversity"@en . . "RIV/67985939:_____/08:00313699" . .