"1"^^ . . "Metalografick\u00E1 anal\u00FDza no\u017E\u016F. P\u0159\u00EDloha 2"@cs . . . "Z(AV0Z80020508)" . "\u00DAstav Archeologick\u00E9 pam\u00E1tkov\u00E9 p\u00E9\u010De st\u0159edn\u00EDch \u010Cech" . "Ho\u0161ek, Ji\u0159\u00ED" . "1"^^ . "N\u016F\u017E z\u00A0K\u0159eslic hrobu \u010D.3 a z Dob\u0159ichova-Pi\u010Dhory hrobu VI byly metalograficky prozkoum\u00E1ny s c\u00EDlem posoudit z\u00E1kladn\u00ED konstrukci jejich \u010Depel\u00ED, kvalitu a dle mo\u017Enost\u00ED vyslovit hypot\u00E9zu o jejich p\u016Fvodn\u00EDm tepeln\u00E9m zpracov\u00E1n\u00ED. Oba no\u017Ee byly z\u00A0pohledu materi\u00E1lu dobr\u00E9, oba vykov\u00E1ny z\u00A0oceli, p\u0159i\u010Dem\u017E \u010Depel z\u00A0K\u0159eslic z\u0159ejm\u011B nav\u00EDc m\u011Bla p\u016Fvodn\u011B nauhli\u010Den\u00E9 ost\u0159\u00ED. \u010Cepel z\u00A0Dob\u0159ichova zase nesla prokazateln\u00E9 stopy paketov\u00E1n\u00ED, kter\u00E9 teoreticky mohlo b\u00FDt provedeno ve snaze o vyrovn\u00E1n\u00ED obsah\u016F uhl\u00EDku a zhomogenizov\u00E1n\u00ED struktury. U obou no\u017E\u016F lze p\u0159itom vyzdvihnout n\u00EDzkou vm\u011Bstkovitost, co\u017E by sv\u011Bd\u010Dilo o pe\u010Dliv\u00E9m zpracov\u00E1n\u00ED a pou\u017E\u00EDv\u00E1n\u00ED sva\u0159ovac\u00EDch prost\u0159edk\u016F (k\u0159emi\u010Dit\u00E9ho p\u00EDsku). Ani u jednoho z\u00A0exempl\u00E1\u0159\u016F dnes nelze prok\u00E1zat p\u016Fvodn\u00ED kalen\u00ED, oba nicm\u00E9n\u011B n\u00E1le\u017E\u00ED k\u00A0velmi kvalitn\u00EDm v\u00FDrobk\u016Fm sv\u00E9 doby, u kter\u00FDch byla v\u00FDroba z\u00A0paketovan\u00FDch ocelov\u00FDch polotovar\u016F anebo nauhli\u010Dov\u00E1n\u00ED v\u00A0se\u010Dn\u00FDch a \u0159ezn\u00FDch hran\u00E1ch obvykl\u00E9." . . . "Metalografick\u00E1 anal\u00FDza no\u017E\u016F. P\u0159\u00EDloha 2"@cs . . . "N\u016F\u017E z\u00A0K\u0159eslic hrobu \u010D.3 a z Dob\u0159ichova-Pi\u010Dhory hrobu VI byly metalograficky prozkoum\u00E1ny s c\u00EDlem posoudit z\u00E1kladn\u00ED konstrukci jejich \u010Depel\u00ED, kvalitu a dle mo\u017Enost\u00ED vyslovit hypot\u00E9zu o jejich p\u016Fvodn\u00EDm tepeln\u00E9m zpracov\u00E1n\u00ED. Oba no\u017Ee byly z\u00A0pohledu materi\u00E1lu dobr\u00E9, oba vykov\u00E1ny z\u00A0oceli, p\u0159i\u010Dem\u017E \u010Depel z\u00A0K\u0159eslic z\u0159ejm\u011B nav\u00EDc m\u011Bla p\u016Fvodn\u011B nauhli\u010Den\u00E9 ost\u0159\u00ED. \u010Cepel z\u00A0Dob\u0159ichova zase nesla prokazateln\u00E9 stopy paketov\u00E1n\u00ED, kter\u00E9 teoreticky mohlo b\u00FDt provedeno ve snaze o vyrovn\u00E1n\u00ED obsah\u016F uhl\u00EDku a zhomogenizov\u00E1n\u00ED struktury. U obou no\u017E\u016F lze p\u0159itom vyzdvihnout n\u00EDzkou vm\u011Bstkovitost, co\u017E by sv\u011Bd\u010Dilo o pe\u010Dliv\u00E9m zpracov\u00E1n\u00ED a pou\u017E\u00EDv\u00E1n\u00ED sva\u0159ovac\u00EDch prost\u0159edk\u016F (k\u0159emi\u010Dit\u00E9ho p\u00EDsku). Ani u jednoho z\u00A0exempl\u00E1\u0159\u016F dnes nelze prok\u00E1zat p\u016Fvodn\u00ED kalen\u00ED, oba nicm\u00E9n\u011B n\u00E1le\u017E\u00ED k\u00A0velmi kvalitn\u00EDm v\u00FDrobk\u016Fm sv\u00E9 doby, u kter\u00FDch byla v\u00FDroba z\u00A0paketovan\u00FDch ocelov\u00FDch polotovar\u016F anebo nauhli\u010Dov\u00E1n\u00ED v\u00A0se\u010Dn\u00FDch a \u0159ezn\u00FDch hran\u00E1ch obvykl\u00E9."@cs . "Metalografick\u00E1 anal\u00FDza no\u017E\u016F. P\u0159\u00EDloha 2" . . "485046" . "Kounice" . "307;311" . "RIV/67985912:_____/06:00050403!RIV07-AV0-67985912" . . "Metalografick\u00E1 anal\u00FDza no\u017E\u016F. P\u0159\u00EDloha 2" . "[A5E3720BF0E5]" . . "5"^^ . "Praha" . "2005-09-20+02:00"^^ . "archaeometallurgy; knife"@en . "80-86756-11-4" . "RIV/67985912:_____/06:00050403" . . "Metallographic analyse of knives. Appendix 2"@en . "Archeologie barbar\u016F 2005. Sborn\u00EDk p\u0159\u00EDsp\u011Bvk\u016F z I. protohistorick\u00E9 konference" . "Metallographic analyse of knives. Appendix 2"@en . . . . "Knife from K\u0159eslice grave No.3 and very similar knife No. 53.541 from grave VI from Dob\u0159ichov \u2013Pi\u010Dhora were metallographicaly examined in order to evaluate their original construction and quality of used material. Both of them were found very good, originally forged out of steel and at least the blade from K\u0159eslice in addition most likely carburised in the cutting edge. The blade from Dob\u0159ichov-Pi\u010Dhora revealed traces of piling, which could be done in order to homogenize distribution of carbon. In both cases we can underline very low amount of slag inclusions, what witnesses for precise treatment and forging. In any case we cannot describe original heat treatment (if quenched or not), both the knives however ranked among contemporary high quality products, which were usually made of piled steel and/or carburised in their cutting edges."@en . .