. "Preprints of the 3rd International Workshop on Scalable Decision Making held in conjunction with ECML/PKDD 2013" . "68306" . . . "1"^^ . . "978-80-903834-8-7" . . "Avanesyan, Galina" . "Prague" . "Prague" . . . . "Knejflov\u00E1, Zuzana" . "Guy, Tatiana Valentine" . "Players; Non-Rationality; Ultimatum Game"@en . "DEMO: What Lies Beneath Players' Non-Rationality in Ultimatum Game?" . "RIV/67985556:_____/13:00396810!RIV14-GA0-67985556" . . . "DEMO: What Lies Beneath Players' Non-Rationality in Ultimatum Game?" . "DEMO: What Lies Beneath Players' Non-Rationality in Ultimatum Game?"@en . . . . . . "DEMO: What Lies Beneath Players' Non-Rationality in Ultimatum Game?"@en . "K\u00E1rn\u00FD, Miroslav" . . "I, P(GA13-13502S)" . "The rational strategy suggested by the game theory predicts a human playing Ultimatum Game (UG) would have tendency to decide in accordance with the assumption of self-interested rationality, i.e. to choose more for oneself and offer the least amount possible for co-players [2]. This \u201Cutilitarian and gametheoretically correct \u201Crational behaviour is however rarely observed when experiments are conducted with human beings [1]. Long-term research in experimental economics indicates that humans do not behave as selfish as traditional economics assume them to do. In UG, human-responders reject offers they find too low while human-proposers often offer more than the smallest amount. An intuitively plausible interpretation of this phenomenon is that responders would rather give up some profit than be treated unfairly. This \u201Cnon-rational behaviour provides an insight into human\u2019s motivation as a social being. The work challenges this view and insists on human rationality." . . . "4"^^ . . "2013-09-23+02:00"^^ . . "The rational strategy suggested by the game theory predicts a human playing Ultimatum Game (UG) would have tendency to decide in accordance with the assumption of self-interested rationality, i.e. to choose more for oneself and offer the least amount possible for co-players [2]. This \u201Cutilitarian and gametheoretically correct \u201Crational behaviour is however rarely observed when experiments are conducted with human beings [1]. Long-term research in experimental economics indicates that humans do not behave as selfish as traditional economics assume them to do. In UG, human-responders reject offers they find too low while human-proposers often offer more than the smallest amount. An intuitively plausible interpretation of this phenomenon is that responders would rather give up some profit than be treated unfairly. This \u201Cnon-rational behaviour provides an insight into human\u2019s motivation as a social being. The work challenges this view and insists on human rationality."@en . "RIV/67985556:_____/13:00396810" . . "\u00DAstav teorie informace a automatizace AV \u010CR" . "4"^^ . "[481127E7DC13]" .