"Smrky kultivovan\u00E9 osm let v dvojn\u00E1sobn\u00E9 vzdu\u0161n\u00E9 [CO2]- E reagovaly v\u011Bt\u0161\u00EDm n\u00E1r\u016Fstem nadzemn\u00ED (o 12 %) i podzemn\u00ED (o 37 %) biomasy ve srovn\u00E1n\u00ED s b\u011B\u017Enou [CO2]- A. Nejv\u00FDznamn\u011Bji vzrostla biomasa i absorp\u010Dn\u00ED plocha jemn\u00FDch ko\u0159en\u016F (a\u017E o 60%), p\u0159edev\u0161\u00EDm sekund\u00E1rn\u00ED struktury zat\u00EDmco prim\u00E1rn\u00ED struktura ko\u0159en\u016F r\u016Fstov\u011B stimulov\u00E1na nebyla. A\u010Dkoli ra\u0161en\u00ED pupen\u016F nebylo zv\u00FD\u0161enou [CO2] ovlivn\u011Bno, prodlu\u017Eovac\u00ED r\u016Fst letorost\u016F byl urychlen. Celkov\u00E1 d\u00E9lka letorost\u016F po ukon\u010Den\u00ED prodlu\u017Eovan\u00ED f\u00E1ze byla v A a E srovnateln\u00E1. V E ve srovn\u00E1n\u00ED s A m\u011Bly jehlice vet\u0161\u00ED d\u00E9lku (o 18 %) i plochu povrchu (o 16 %), specifick\u00E1 listov\u00E1 plocha vyjad\u0159uj\u00EDc\u00ED mno\u017Estv\u00ED biomasy na jednotku povrchu byla ni\u017E\u0161\u00ED (o 5 %). U E strom\u016F byla vy\u0161\u0161\u00ED hustota d\u0159eva v cel\u00E9m vertik\u00E1ln\u00EDm profilu kmene (o 5 %), tlou\u0161\u0165ka kmene (o 14 %) i v\u00FD\u0161ka stromu (o 11 %). Vliv zv\u00FD\u0161en\u00E9ho [CO2] se neprojevil v po\u010Dtu jehlic na letorostu ani p\u0159eslenov\u00FDch v\u011Btv\u00ED."@cs . "P(SP/2D1/70/08), Z(AV0Z60870520)" . "fenologick\u00E1 a Morfologick\u00E1 odezva smrku ztepil\u00E9ho na zv\u00FD\u0161enou koncentracI CO2"@cs . . "phemology; morphology; norway spruce; elevated CO2"@en . . "Pokorn\u00FD, Radek" . "Norway spruce trees enhanced their aboveground (about 12 %) and belowground biomass (about 37 %) after eight years of cultivation under doubled air [CO2]- E comparing to ambient [CO2]- A. The most significant increase of biomass was found for fine roots (about 60%), particularly grown on secondary root structure. However, bud break was not affected by elevated [CO2], initial shoot growth was accelerated. Total shoot length was comparable in A and in E in the end of elongation shoot growth. In E comparing to A, needles were longer (about 18 %) and larger in surface area (about 16 %). They had lower specific leaf area (about 5 %). In E comparing to A- trees, higher stem wood density (about 5 %), stem thickness (about 14 %) and tree height (about 11 %) were detected. Elevated [CO2] did not affect number of needles per shoot length unit and number of whorl branches."@en . . "RIV/67179843:_____/10:00347744!RIV11-MZP-67179843" . "fenologick\u00E1 a Morfologick\u00E1 odezva smrku ztepil\u00E9ho na zv\u00FD\u0161enou koncentracI CO2" . . . . . . . . . "Phenological and morphological response of Norway spruce to elevated CO2 concentration"@en . . . "RIV/67179843:_____/10:00347744" . "fenologick\u00E1 a Morfologick\u00E1 odezva smrku ztepil\u00E9ho na zv\u00FD\u0161enou koncentracI CO2" . . . . "2"^^ . "fenologick\u00E1 a Morfologick\u00E1 odezva smrku ztepil\u00E9ho na zv\u00FD\u0161enou koncentracI CO2"@cs . "258965" . "Smrky kultivovan\u00E9 osm let v dvojn\u00E1sobn\u00E9 vzdu\u0161n\u00E9 [CO2]- E reagovaly v\u011Bt\u0161\u00EDm n\u00E1r\u016Fstem nadzemn\u00ED (o 12 %) i podzemn\u00ED (o 37 %) biomasy ve srovn\u00E1n\u00ED s b\u011B\u017Enou [CO2]- A. Nejv\u00FDznamn\u011Bji vzrostla biomasa i absorp\u010Dn\u00ED plocha jemn\u00FDch ko\u0159en\u016F (a\u017E o 60%), p\u0159edev\u0161\u00EDm sekund\u00E1rn\u00ED struktury zat\u00EDmco prim\u00E1rn\u00ED struktura ko\u0159en\u016F r\u016Fstov\u011B stimulov\u00E1na nebyla. A\u010Dkoli ra\u0161en\u00ED pupen\u016F nebylo zv\u00FD\u0161enou [CO2] ovlivn\u011Bno, prodlu\u017Eovac\u00ED r\u016Fst letorost\u016F byl urychlen. Celkov\u00E1 d\u00E9lka letorost\u016F po ukon\u010Den\u00ED prodlu\u017Eovan\u00ED f\u00E1ze byla v A a E srovnateln\u00E1. V E ve srovn\u00E1n\u00ED s A m\u011Bly jehlice vet\u0161\u00ED d\u00E9lku (o 18 %) i plochu povrchu (o 16 %), specifick\u00E1 listov\u00E1 plocha vyjad\u0159uj\u00EDc\u00ED mno\u017Estv\u00ED biomasy na jednotku povrchu byla ni\u017E\u0161\u00ED (o 5 %). U E strom\u016F byla vy\u0161\u0161\u00ED hustota d\u0159eva v cel\u00E9m vertik\u00E1ln\u00EDm profilu kmene (o 5 %), tlou\u0161\u0165ka kmene (o 14 %) i v\u00FD\u0161ka stromu (o 11 %). Vliv zv\u00FD\u0161en\u00E9ho [CO2] se neprojevil v po\u010Dtu jehlic na letorostu ani p\u0159eslenov\u00FDch v\u011Btv\u00ED." . "[AA14B6986AFA]" . "2"^^ . . "Tom\u00E1\u0161kov\u00E1, Ivana" . . . "Phenological and morphological response of Norway spruce to elevated CO2 concentration"@en .