"Lapka, Miloslav" . . "289;299" . . . "584590" . . "Revealing Financial Preferences in the Case of Landscape Amenity-Contingent Valuation Method" . "contingent valuation; landscape; aesthetical valuation"@en . "RIV/67179843:_____/04:00024596!RIV06-AV0-67179843" . "11"^^ . . "RIV/67179843:_____/04:00024596" . "[04AEBEACE2D1]" . "80-86732-45-2" . "Hodnocen\u00ED kr\u00E1sy krajiny nen\u00ED p\u0159\u00EDli\u0161 \u010Dast\u00E9 a z ekonomick\u00E9ho hlediska je i relativn\u011B slo\u017Eit\u00E9. Na\u0161e studie se soust\u0159edila na srovn\u00E1n\u00ED estetick\u00FDch preferenc\u00ED \u010Desk\u00FDch a japonsk\u00FDch respondent\u016F t\u00FDkaj\u00EDc\u00EDch se rur\u00E1ln\u00ED krajiny \u2013 pou\u017Eitou metodou byla CVM. Dal\u0161\u00EDm z c\u00EDl\u016F byla snaha odkr\u00FDt preference dotazovan\u00FDch ve finan\u010Dn\u00ED form\u011B. Tyto preference jsme pou\u017Eily jako kvantitativn\u00ED indik\u00E1tor pro prov\u011B\u0159en\u00ED kvalitativn\u00EDch preferenc\u00ED respondent\u016F. Zd\u00E1 se, \u017Ee siln\u00E1 korelace mezi estetickou a finan\u010Dn\u00ED evaluac\u00ED existuje ve dvou extr\u00E9mn\u00EDch p\u0159\u00EDpadech \u2013 u respondent\u016F, kter\u00E9 t\u00E9ma nezaj\u00EDm\u00E1 a naopak u respondent\u016F, kter\u00E9 estetika krajiny velmi zaj\u00EDm\u00E1. Podstatn\u00FD rozd\u00EDl se objevil mezi \u010Desk\u00FDmi a japonsk\u00FDmi respondenty v p\u0159\u00EDpad\u011B otev\u0159en\u00E9ho a uzav\u0159en\u00E9ho p\u0159\u00EDstupu do krajiny."@cs . . "Finan\u010Dn\u00ED ohodnocen\u00ED kr\u00E1sy krajiny - metoda CVM"@cs . "Finan\u010Dn\u00ED ohodnocen\u00ED kr\u00E1sy krajiny - metoda CVM"@cs . . "Evaluation of landscape amenity is not very common and relatively difficult from the economic point of view. In our case study focused on comparing aesthetic preferences of Czech and Japan respondents regarding rural landscape. We used the contingent valuation method. We also wanted to reveal the respondent\u2019s preferences in a financial form. These preferences served us as quantitative indicator for an attestation of the respondent\u2019s qualitative preferences. It seemed that a strong correlation between the aesthetical and financial evaluation exist in two extreme cases \u2013 respondents were not interested, or they were strongly involved in landscape amenity. A substantial difference occured between the Czech and Japanese respondents in the case of case of open or closed access to the landscape."@en . "Revealing Financial Preferences in the Case of Landscape Amenity-Contingent Valuation Method"@en . "Cudl\u00EDnov\u00E1, Eva" . . . "Revealing Financial Preferences in the Case of Landscape Amenity-Contingent Valuation Method"@en . . "MATFYZPRESS, Charles University in Prague" . . . "2"^^ . "Development of the Czech Society in the European Union" . "Prague" . . "Prague" . . . . "2"^^ . "Revealing Financial Preferences in the Case of Landscape Amenity-Contingent Valuation Method" . . . "Evaluation of landscape amenity is not very common and relatively difficult from the economic point of view. In our case study focused on comparing aesthetic preferences of Czech and Japan respondents regarding rural landscape. We used the contingent valuation method. We also wanted to reveal the respondent\u2019s preferences in a financial form. These preferences served us as quantitative indicator for an attestation of the respondent\u2019s qualitative preferences. It seemed that a strong correlation between the aesthetical and financial evaluation exist in two extreme cases \u2013 respondents were not interested, or they were strongly involved in landscape amenity. A substantial difference occured between the Czech and Japanese respondents in the case of case of open or closed access to the landscape." . "2004-10-21+02:00"^^ . "P(ME 530), Z(AV0Z6087904)" . .