"[318DCC6F5793]" . "Seroprevalence Toxoplasma gondii u osl\u016F dom\u00E1c\u00EDch v ji\u017En\u00ED It\u00E1lii"@cs . "Z(MSM6215712402)" . . . . "IFAT; LAT; serology; donkeys; Toxoplasmosis"@en . "Sborn\u00EDk p\u0159\u00EDsp\u011Bvk\u016F XIV. Konference mlad\u00FDch v\u011Bdeck\u00FDch pracovn\u00EDk\u016F s mezin\u00E1rodn\u00ED \u00FA\u010Dast\u00ED" . . "Seroprevalence Toxoplasma gondii u osl\u016F dom\u00E1c\u00EDch v ji\u017En\u00ED It\u00E1lii" . "The aim of the present study was to test sera of donkeys for T. gondii antibodies by Latex Agglutination Test (LAT) and the Indirect Fluorescent Antibody Test (IFAT). In total, 238 sera were collected during autumn 2010 on 20 donkey farms in southern Italy. Antibodies against T. gondii were found in 12 (5%) and 19 (8%) donkeys by LAT and IFAT, respectively. No statistical significant difference (P } 0.05) was found between genders, age, breeds, use of donkeys and their seropositivity. However, higher seroprevalence was found in females (9%) compared to males (3%); the seroprevalence increased with age. Higher seroprevalence was found in crossbreed donkeys (9%) compared to pure breed donkeys (7%); with different seroprevalence in individual breeds. Antibodies against T. gondii were found in 9%, 7%, 6% and 0% of donkeys used for milk, as pet animal, for meat and for breeding, respectively. The size of farms, the presence of cats in farms or grazing during whole year has not been confirmed as a risk factor for T. gondii infection in donkeys (P } 0.05). The present study describes for the first time the presence of antibodies to T. gondii in donkeys in Italy and the second report in Europe."@en . "Macha\u010Dov\u00E1, Tereza" . . "Seroprevalence Toxoplasma gondii u osl\u016F dom\u00E1c\u00EDch v ji\u017En\u00ED It\u00E1lii" . "3"^^ . . . . . "Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in donkeys from southern Italy"@en . . . . . "RIV/62157124:16270/12:43871556" . "RIV/62157124:16270/12:43871556!RIV13-MSM-16270___" . "Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in donkeys from southern Italy"@en . "2012-05-29+02:00"^^ . "C\u00EDlem t\u00E9to studie bylo vy\u0161et\u0159it s\u00E9ra osl\u016F na p\u0159\u00EDtomnost protil\u00E1tek proti T. gondii pomoc\u00ED latex aglutina\u010Dn\u00EDho testu (LAT) a nep\u0159\u00EDm\u00E9 imunofluorescence (IFAT). Sb\u011Br vzork\u016F prob\u00EDhal na podzim 2010 na 20 farm\u00E1ch v ji\u017En\u00ED It\u00E1lii. Celkem bylo z\u00EDsk\u00E1no 238 vzork\u016F. Protil\u00E1tky proti T. gondii byly detekov\u00E1ny u 12 (5%) osl\u016F metodou LAT a u 19 (8%) osl\u016F metodou IFAT. Nebyl zji\u0161t\u011Bn statisticky v\u00FDznamn\u00FD rozd\u00EDl (P } 0.05) mezi pohlav\u00EDm, v\u011Bkem, plemenem \u010Di vyu\u017Eit\u00EDm osl\u016F a jejich s\u00E9ropozitivitou. Nicm\u00E9n\u011B, vy\u0161\u0161\u00ED pozitivita byla zji\u0161t\u011Bna u samic (9%) v porovn\u00E1n\u00ED se samci (3%); s\u00E9roprevalence se z\u00E1rove\u0148 zvy\u0161ovala s v\u011Bkem. Vy\u0161\u0161\u00ED seroprevalence byla zji\u0161t\u011Bna u k\u0159\u00ED\u017Eenc\u016F (9%) v porovn\u00E1n\u00ED s \u010Dist\u00FDmi plemeny (7%); s rozd\u00EDlnou prevalenc\u00ED u jednotliv\u00FDch plemen. Protil\u00E1tky proti T. gondii byly zji\u0161t\u011Bny u 9% osl\u016F chovan\u00FDch na ml\u00E9ko, 7% osl\u016F chovan\u00FDch ze z\u00E1liby, 6% osl\u016F chovan\u00FDch pro maso; chovn\u00ED osli byli negativn\u00ED. Velikost farmy, p\u0159\u00EDtomnost ko\u010Dek na farm\u00E1ch nebo pastva osl\u016F b\u011Bhem cel\u00E9ho roku nepat\u0159\u00ED mezi rizikov\u00E9 faktory infekce (P } 0.05). Jedn\u00E1 se o prvn\u00ED pr\u016Fkaz protil\u00E1tek proti T. gondii u osl\u016F v It\u00E1lii a druh\u00FD pr\u016Fkaz v Evrop\u011B."@cs . "Seroprevalence Toxoplasma gondii u osl\u016F dom\u00E1c\u00EDch v ji\u017En\u00ED It\u00E1lii"@cs . . "978-80-7305-612-4" . "1"^^ . . "Brno" . . "Brno" . . "167546" . "Veterin\u00E1rn\u00ED a farmaceutick\u00E1 univerzita Brno" . "1"^^ . . "C\u00EDlem t\u00E9to studie bylo vy\u0161et\u0159it s\u00E9ra osl\u016F na p\u0159\u00EDtomnost protil\u00E1tek proti T. gondii pomoc\u00ED latex aglutina\u010Dn\u00EDho testu (LAT) a nep\u0159\u00EDm\u00E9 imunofluorescence (IFAT). Sb\u011Br vzork\u016F prob\u00EDhal na podzim 2010 na 20 farm\u00E1ch v ji\u017En\u00ED It\u00E1lii. Celkem bylo z\u00EDsk\u00E1no 238 vzork\u016F. Protil\u00E1tky proti T. gondii byly detekov\u00E1ny u 12 (5%) osl\u016F metodou LAT a u 19 (8%) osl\u016F metodou IFAT. Nebyl zji\u0161t\u011Bn statisticky v\u00FDznamn\u00FD rozd\u00EDl (P } 0.05) mezi pohlav\u00EDm, v\u011Bkem, plemenem \u010Di vyu\u017Eit\u00EDm osl\u016F a jejich s\u00E9ropozitivitou. Nicm\u00E9n\u011B, vy\u0161\u0161\u00ED pozitivita byla zji\u0161t\u011Bna u samic (9%) v porovn\u00E1n\u00ED se samci (3%); s\u00E9roprevalence se z\u00E1rove\u0148 zvy\u0161ovala s v\u011Bkem. Vy\u0161\u0161\u00ED seroprevalence byla zji\u0161t\u011Bna u k\u0159\u00ED\u017Eenc\u016F (9%) v porovn\u00E1n\u00ED s \u010Dist\u00FDmi plemeny (7%); s rozd\u00EDlnou prevalenc\u00ED u jednotliv\u00FDch plemen. Protil\u00E1tky proti T. gondii byly zji\u0161t\u011Bny u 9% osl\u016F chovan\u00FDch na ml\u00E9ko, 7% osl\u016F chovan\u00FDch ze z\u00E1liby, 6% osl\u016F chovan\u00FDch pro maso; chovn\u00ED osli byli negativn\u00ED. Velikost farmy, p\u0159\u00EDtomnost ko\u010Dek na farm\u00E1ch nebo pastva osl\u016F b\u011Bhem cel\u00E9ho roku nepat\u0159\u00ED mezi rizikov\u00E9 faktory infekce (P } 0.05). Jedn\u00E1 se o prvn\u00ED pr\u016Fkaz protil\u00E1tek proti T. gondii u osl\u016F v It\u00E1lii a druh\u00FD pr\u016Fkaz v Evrop\u011B." . "16270" . .