. . "serology; toxoplasmosis; goose; duck; chicken; turkey"@en . . . "\u010Cesk\u00E1 parazitologick\u00E1 spole\u010Dnost" . "V\u00FDskyt protil\u00E1tek proti Toxoplasma gondii u dr\u016Fbe\u017Ee v \u010CR." . "Presence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in poultry from the Czech Republic."@en . . "80-86778-07-X" . "The method of Indirect fluorescence antibody test (IFAT) was used to test 538 water fowls (geese and dusks) and 570 gallinaceous birds (chickens and turkeys) for the presence of specific antibodies against T. gondii. Geese came from five farms of three districts, ducks came from 10 farms of five districts, chickens broilers came from 29 farms of 19 districts, chickens came from 14 farms of 10 districts, and turkeys came form six farms of six districts. In water fowls, 24% prevalence was found. In geese, 43% prevalence (77 positive out of 178 examined) was found with titres 40, 320 and 1280 in 32, 37 and eight geese, respectively. In ducks, 14% prevalence (52 out of 360) was found with titres 40 and 320 in 46 and six ducks, respectively. In gallinaceous birds, only one of 293 chicken broilers was positive with titre 40; sera of 217 hens and 60 turkeys were negative. We found extremely higher antibody prevalence in water fowls compared to gallinaceous birds. The water environment play un important role"@en . "16270" . "1"^^ . "Praha" . . "Presence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in poultry from the Czech Republic."@en . "V\u00FDskyt protil\u00E1tek proti Toxoplasma gondii u dr\u016Fbe\u017Ee v \u010CR."@cs . . . "2"^^ . "RIV/62157124:16270/08:00001603" . "Sedl\u00E1k, Kamil" . . . "[8A6CAD57044C]" . . "3"^^ . . "B\u00E1rtov\u00E1, Eva" . "404317" . . . . "Z(MSM6215712402)" . "V\u00FDskyt protil\u00E1tek proti Toxoplasma gondii u dr\u016Fbe\u017Ee v \u010CR." . "Metodou nep\u0159\u00EDm\u00E9 imunofluorescence bylo vy\u0161et\u0159eno 538 s\u00E9r vodn\u00ED dr\u016Fbe\u017Ee (husa dom\u00E1c\u00ED, kachna dom\u00E1c\u00ED) a 570 s\u00E9r hrabav\u00E9 dr\u016Fbe\u017Ee (kur dom\u00E1c\u00ED, krocan dom\u00E1c\u00ED) na p\u0159\u00EDtomnost protil\u00E1tek proti Toxoplasma gondii. Husy poch\u00E1zely z 5 chov\u016F ve 3 okresech, kachny z 10 chov\u016F v p\u011Bti okresech, brojle\u0159i kura dom\u00E1c\u00EDho z 29 chov\u016F v 19 okresech, slepice ze 14 chov\u016F v 10 okresech a krocani z 6 chov\u016F v 6 okresech. U vodn\u00ED dr\u016Fbe\u017Ee byla zji\u0161t\u011Bna 24% s\u00E9roprevalence. Protil\u00E1tky proti T. gondii byly prok\u00E1z\u00E1ny u 43 % (77/178) hus s titry 1:40 u 32 hus, 1:320 u 37 hus a 1:1280 u 8 hus. U kachen byla zji\u0161t\u011Bna 14 % (52/360) s\u00E9roprevalence. Titry 1:40 byly u 46 kachen a 1:320 u 6 kachen. U kura dom\u00E1c\u00EDho byl pozitivn\u00ED pouze jeden brojler (n=293) s titrem 1:40; s\u00E9ra slepic (n=217) a krocan\u016F (n=60) byla negativn\u00ED. Prevalence protil\u00E1tek proti T. gondii je v\u00FDrazn\u011B vy\u0161\u0161\u00ED u vodn\u00ED dr\u016Fb\u011B\u017Ee ne\u017E u hrabav\u00E9 dr\u016Fbe\u017Ee. Vodn\u00ED prost\u0159ed\u00ED hraje v\u00FDznamnou roli v \u0161\u00ED\u0159en\u00ED T. gondii."@cs . . . "Liter\u00E1k, Ivan" . "sborn\u00EDk abstrakt\u016F z konference VIII. \u010Cesk\u00E9 a slovensk\u00E9 parazitologick\u00E9 dny" . "Metodou nep\u0159\u00EDm\u00E9 imunofluorescence bylo vy\u0161et\u0159eno 538 s\u00E9r vodn\u00ED dr\u016Fbe\u017Ee (husa dom\u00E1c\u00ED, kachna dom\u00E1c\u00ED) a 570 s\u00E9r hrabav\u00E9 dr\u016Fbe\u017Ee (kur dom\u00E1c\u00ED, krocan dom\u00E1c\u00ED) na p\u0159\u00EDtomnost protil\u00E1tek proti Toxoplasma gondii. Husy poch\u00E1zely z 5 chov\u016F ve 3 okresech, kachny z 10 chov\u016F v p\u011Bti okresech, brojle\u0159i kura dom\u00E1c\u00EDho z 29 chov\u016F v 19 okresech, slepice ze 14 chov\u016F v 10 okresech a krocani z 6 chov\u016F v 6 okresech. U vodn\u00ED dr\u016Fbe\u017Ee byla zji\u0161t\u011Bna 24% s\u00E9roprevalence. Protil\u00E1tky proti T. gondii byly prok\u00E1z\u00E1ny u 43 % (77/178) hus s titry 1:40 u 32 hus, 1:320 u 37 hus a 1:1280 u 8 hus. U kachen byla zji\u0161t\u011Bna 14 % (52/360) s\u00E9roprevalence. Titry 1:40 byly u 46 kachen a 1:320 u 6 kachen. U kura dom\u00E1c\u00EDho byl pozitivn\u00ED pouze jeden brojler (n=293) s titrem 1:40; s\u00E9ra slepic (n=217) a krocan\u016F (n=60) byla negativn\u00ED. Prevalence protil\u00E1tek proti T. gondii je v\u00FDrazn\u011B vy\u0161\u0161\u00ED u vodn\u00ED dr\u016Fb\u011B\u017Ee ne\u017E u hrabav\u00E9 dr\u016Fbe\u017Ee. Vodn\u00ED prost\u0159ed\u00ED hraje v\u00FDznamnou roli v \u0161\u00ED\u0159en\u00ED T. gondii." . . . "V\u00FDskyt protil\u00E1tek proti Toxoplasma gondii u dr\u016Fbe\u017Ee v \u010CR."@cs . "RIV/62157124:16270/08:00001603!RIV09-MSM-16270___" .