. "Spravedlnost, rovnost a mor\u00E1lka v pr\u00E1vu" . "Z(MSM6215648904)" . "legal system; rule of law; fairness; equality"@en . . . "Masarykova univerzita" . "[07D9EF051A17]" . . "978-80-210-4733-4" . "396691" . "RIV/62156489:43110/08:00137095" . "2"^^ . "2"^^ . . . . . "RIV/62156489:43110/08:00137095!RIV09-MSM-43110___" . . "Spravedlnost, rovnost a mor\u00E1lka v pr\u00E1vu" . . . "There is no possibility to define %22fairness%22 without giving rise to other doubts about integrity and complexity of this statement because a great number of significant jurists and philosophers had already tried to define it in the past. Discriminability of this term is consumedly complicated. Despite of this the laws use the term fairness without defining it, it is a standard how we are measuring value and quality of legal rule, but there is still a lot to excellence. Nowadays there is no difference. The law of these times is stigmatized by many abuses, spreading legal order which is often trying to regulate all possible and impossible situations but it is impossible to recognize it in detail however the worst is that the particular legal rules are without a logical connection with an organic complex- they are inconsistent and they can lead to uncertainty of the judge, of the law recipient and their feeling that it was unjust. So how we are satisfying the need of fairness by realizing the a"@en . "5"^^ . "43110" . . . "Pokou\u0161et se definovat pojem %22 spravedlnost%22 vy\u010Derp\u00E1vaj\u00EDc\u00EDm zp\u016Fsobem, tak, aby nevyvol\u00E1val \u017E\u00E1dn\u00E9 dal\u0161\u00ED pochybnosti o \u00FAplnosti a komplexnosti takov\u00E9ho vyj\u00E1d\u0159en\u00ED, na tomto m\u00EDst\u011B z\u0159ejm\u011B nem\u00E1 v\u011Bt\u0161\u00ED v\u00FDznam, nebo\u0165 cel\u00E1 \u0159ada v\u00FDznamn\u00FDch pr\u00E1vn\u00EDch teoretik\u016F a filozof\u016F se o takovou definici v historii pokou\u0161ela. Uchopitelnost tohoto pojmu je nesm\u00EDrn\u011B obt\u00ED\u017En\u00E1. P\u0159esto platn\u00E9 pr\u00E1vo s pojmem spravedlnosti po\u010D\u00EDt\u00E1, a\u010D jej neum\u00ED s kone\u010Dnou platnost\u00ED definovat, je to krit\u00E9rium, kter\u00FDm hodnotu a kvalitu pr\u00E1vn\u00EDch norem st\u00E1le pom\u011B\u0159ujeme, i kdy\u017E k dokonalosti chyb\u00ED st\u00E1le mnoho. Nejinak tomu je i dnes. Pr\u00E1vo dne\u0161n\u00ED doby je poznamen\u00E1no mnoh\u00FDmi ne\u0161vary, ko\u0161at\u00FD pr\u00E1vn\u00ED \u0159\u00E1d kter\u00FD se za\u010Dasto sna\u017E\u00ED o detailn\u00ED \u00FApravy v\u0161ech mo\u017En\u00FDch i nemo\u017En\u00FDch situac\u00ED t\u00E9m\u011B\u0159 neumo\u017E\u0148uje jeho komplexn\u00ED pozn\u00E1n\u00ED, av\u0161ak, co\u017E je hor\u0161\u00ED, jednotliv\u00E9 pr\u00E1vn\u00ED normy \u010Dasto postr\u00E1daj\u00ED logiku spojen\u00ED do organick\u00E9ho celku - jsou rozporupln\u00E9 a v\u00FDsledkem m\u016F\u017Ee b\u00FDt naprost\u00E1 nejistota jak soudce, tak adres\u00E1ta pr\u00E1va, a jejich n\u00E1sledn\u00FD pocit, \u017Ee spravedlnosti op\u011Bt"@cs . "Pokou\u0161et se definovat pojem %22 spravedlnost%22 vy\u010Derp\u00E1vaj\u00EDc\u00EDm zp\u016Fsobem, tak, aby nevyvol\u00E1val \u017E\u00E1dn\u00E9 dal\u0161\u00ED pochybnosti o \u00FAplnosti a komplexnosti takov\u00E9ho vyj\u00E1d\u0159en\u00ED, na tomto m\u00EDst\u011B z\u0159ejm\u011B nem\u00E1 v\u011Bt\u0161\u00ED v\u00FDznam, nebo\u0165 cel\u00E1 \u0159ada v\u00FDznamn\u00FDch pr\u00E1vn\u00EDch teoretik\u016F a filozof\u016F se o takovou definici v historii pokou\u0161ela. Uchopitelnost tohoto pojmu je nesm\u00EDrn\u011B obt\u00ED\u017En\u00E1. P\u0159esto platn\u00E9 pr\u00E1vo s pojmem spravedlnosti po\u010D\u00EDt\u00E1, a\u010D jej neum\u00ED s kone\u010Dnou platnost\u00ED definovat, je to krit\u00E9rium, kter\u00FDm hodnotu a kvalitu pr\u00E1vn\u00EDch norem st\u00E1le pom\u011B\u0159ujeme, i kdy\u017E k dokonalosti chyb\u00ED st\u00E1le mnoho. Nejinak tomu je i dnes. Pr\u00E1vo dne\u0161n\u00ED doby je poznamen\u00E1no mnoh\u00FDmi ne\u0161vary, ko\u0161at\u00FD pr\u00E1vn\u00ED \u0159\u00E1d kter\u00FD se za\u010Dasto sna\u017E\u00ED o detailn\u00ED \u00FApravy v\u0161ech mo\u017En\u00FDch i nemo\u017En\u00FDch situac\u00ED t\u00E9m\u011B\u0159 neumo\u017E\u0148uje jeho komplexn\u00ED pozn\u00E1n\u00ED, av\u0161ak, co\u017E je hor\u0161\u00ED, jednotliv\u00E9 pr\u00E1vn\u00ED normy \u010Dasto postr\u00E1daj\u00ED logiku spojen\u00ED do organick\u00E9ho celku - jsou rozporupln\u00E9 a v\u00FDsledkem m\u016F\u017Ee b\u00FDt naprost\u00E1 nejistota jak soudce, tak adres\u00E1ta pr\u00E1va, a jejich n\u00E1sledn\u00FD pocit, \u017Ee spravedlnosti op\u011Bt" . "days of law"@en . . "days of law"@en . "Spravedlnost, rovnost a mor\u00E1lka v pr\u00E1vu"@cs . . "Bar\u00E1kov\u00E1, Blanka" . "Dny pr\u00E1va" . "Salachov\u00E1, Bohumila" . . "Spravedlnost, rovnost a mor\u00E1lka v pr\u00E1vu"@cs . . "Brno" .