. "2"^^ . "Why have birds evolved the ability to reject eggs? Typically, foreign egg discrimination is interpreted as evidence that interspecific brood parasitism (IP) has selected for the host's ability to recognize and eliminate foreign eggs. Fewer studies explore the alternative hypothesis that rejection of interspecific eggs is a by-product of host defenses, evolved against conspecific parasitism (CP). We performed a large scale study with replication across taxa (two congeneric Turdus thrushes), space (populations), time (breeding seasons), and treatments (three types of experimental eggs), using a consistent design of egg rejection experiments (n = 1057 nests; including controls), in areas with potential IP either present (Europe; native populations) or absent (New Zealand; introduced populations). These comparisons benefited from the known length of allopatry (one and a half centuries), with no gene flow between native and introduced populations, which is rarely available in host-parasite systems."@en . . . . "4"^^ . . . "RIV/61989592:15310/14:33153916!RIV15-MSM-15310___" . "I, Z(MSM6198959212)" . "12"^^ . "GB - Spojen\u00E9 kr\u00E1lovstv\u00ED Velk\u00E9 Brit\u00E1nie a Severn\u00EDho Irska" . . "[DDF063CB7931]" . . . . "19723" . . "Host responses to interspecific brood parasitism: a by-product of adaptations to conspecific parasitism?"@en . "11" . . "Cassey, Phillip" . . "Sama\u0161, Peter" . "Why have birds evolved the ability to reject eggs? Typically, foreign egg discrimination is interpreted as evidence that interspecific brood parasitism (IP) has selected for the host's ability to recognize and eliminate foreign eggs. Fewer studies explore the alternative hypothesis that rejection of interspecific eggs is a by-product of host defenses, evolved against conspecific parasitism (CP). We performed a large scale study with replication across taxa (two congeneric Turdus thrushes), space (populations), time (breeding seasons), and treatments (three types of experimental eggs), using a consistent design of egg rejection experiments (n = 1057 nests; including controls), in areas with potential IP either present (Europe; native populations) or absent (New Zealand; introduced populations). These comparisons benefited from the known length of allopatry (one and a half centuries), with no gene flow between native and introduced populations, which is rarely available in host-parasite systems." . "Hauber, Mark E" . "000335524200001" . "10.1186/1742-9994-11-34" . . . "http://www.frontiersinzoology.com/content/11/1/34" . "Host responses to interspecific brood parasitism: a by-product of adaptations to conspecific parasitism?" . . . "RIV/61989592:15310/14:33153916" . "Grim, Tom\u00E1\u0161" . . "Host responses to interspecific brood parasitism: a by-product of adaptations to conspecific parasitism?" . "Host responses to interspecific brood parasitism: a by-product of adaptations to conspecific parasitism?"@en . "Frontiers in Zoology" . "species introductions; intraspecific brood parasitism; heterospecific brood parasitism; discrimination; collateral damage; coevolution"@en . "15310" . . "5" . . "1742-9994" .