"81540" . . . . "S" . "8" . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . . "Jak\u00E1 je cena cti?"@cs . "What is the price of the honour?"@en . . . "\u010Cl\u00E1nek se v\u011Bnuje problematice difama\u010Dn\u00EDch v\u00FDrok\u016F, kter\u00E9 jsou zve\u0159ejn\u011Bny v tisku a jejich n\u00E1sledc\u00EDch - pr\u00E1va na omluvu, p\u0159im\u011B\u0159en\u00E9 zadostiu\u010Din\u011Bn\u00ED a n\u00E1hradu \u0161kody. V prv\u00E9 \u010D\u00E1sti je nast\u00EDn\u011Bna z\u00E1kladn\u00ED kolize \u00FAstavn\u011B zaru\u010Den\u00FDch pr\u00E1v - pr\u00E1va na svobodu projevu a pr\u00E1va na ochranu cti a d\u016Fstojnosti. Po vz\u00E1jemn\u00E9m pom\u011B\u0159en\u00ED t\u011Bchto dvou z\u00E1kladn\u00EDch pr\u00E1v jsou nast\u00EDn\u011Bny dal\u0161\u00ED podm\u00EDnky pro vznik odpov\u011Bdnosti za \u0161kodu zp\u016Fsoben\u00E9 difama\u010Dn\u00EDm projevem se z\u0159etelem na zvl\u00E1\u0161tn\u00ED postaven\u00ED tisku v demokratick\u00E9 spole\u010Dnosti. V\u00FDznam pro mo\u017En\u00E9 posouzen\u00ED vzniku n\u00E1roku na n\u00E1hradu \u0161kody hraje i postaven\u00ED difamovan\u00E9 osoby, tj. zda se nejedn\u00E1 o osobu ve\u0159ejn\u011B zn\u00E1mou \u010Di ve\u0159ejn\u011B \u010Dinnou. Naposledy je zm\u00EDn\u011Bna problematika a rozd\u00EDl mezi hodnotov\u00FDm soudem a tvrzen\u00EDm fakt\u016F. S t\u00EDm je spojena ot\u00E1zka d\u016Fkazn\u00EDho b\u0159emene t\u00FDkaj\u00EDc\u00EDho se pravdivosti poskytovan\u00FDch informac\u00ED a povinnost\u00ED ov\u011B\u0159ovat pravdivost t\u011Bchto informac\u00ED ze strany m\u00E9di\u00ED. Z\u00E1v\u011Brem je v \u010Dl\u00E1nku uvedena kr\u00E1tk\u00E1 polemika t\u00FDkaj\u00EDc\u00ED se v\u00FD\u0161e p\u0159izn\u00E1van\u00E9 n\u00E1hrady \u0161kody v p\u0159\u00EDpadech difama\u010Dn\u00EDch projev\u016F a to zejm\u00E9na ve vztahu k \u00FAjm\u011B zp\u016Fsoben\u00E9 v osobnostn\u00EDch pr\u00E1vech \u010Dlov\u011Bka, zejm\u00E9na zda-li v\u00FD\u0161e n\u00E1hrady \u0161kody p\u0159izn\u00E1van\u00E9 \u010Desk\u00FDmi soudy, je dostate\u010Dn\u00E1." . "The article deals with the problem of the defamatory speeches which are published in the newspapers, internet and other possible news media and also deals with the consequences of these defamations speeches. The injured party has usually right for the apology, right for the damages. The first part of this article is about the collision of two freedoms which are granted by the constitution - freedom of speech and the protection of the honor and dignity. These two freedoms (rights) are compared and after the comparison of these two freedoms (rights), there are given other conditions for the liability for the damages caused by the defamatory speech with the emphasis on the special positions of the news media in the democratic society. The important role in the consideration of the rising of the liability for the damages plays the position of the person in the society which is affected by the defamatory speech. We can say that there are two main categories - public active person and person publicly known. At least there is mentioned the issue of the difference between the statement of facts and value judgment. These two mentioned categories above are connected with the question of the burden of proof of the truthfulness of the statement of facts and the duty of the verification of the truthfulness of the facts by the news media. At the end of the article there are mentioned some thoughts regarding of the extent of the damages in the case of the defamatory speeches especially, whether the damages provided by the Czech court are sufficient."@en . . . "Acta Iuridica Olomucensia" . "Jak\u00E1 je cena cti?" . "Jak\u00E1 je cena cti?"@cs . "Jak\u00E1 je cena cti?" . . . "RIV/61989592:15220/13:33148601" . "15220" . "RIV/61989592:15220/13:33148601!RIV14-MSM-15220___" . . "1801-0288" . . "[CA72BF343492]" . . "1"^^ . . "honour, defamation, damages, person, rights"@en . "What is the price of the honour?"@en . "Vl\u010Dek, Karel" . . "\u010Cl\u00E1nek se v\u011Bnuje problematice difama\u010Dn\u00EDch v\u00FDrok\u016F, kter\u00E9 jsou zve\u0159ejn\u011Bny v tisku a jejich n\u00E1sledc\u00EDch - pr\u00E1va na omluvu, p\u0159im\u011B\u0159en\u00E9 zadostiu\u010Din\u011Bn\u00ED a n\u00E1hradu \u0161kody. V prv\u00E9 \u010D\u00E1sti je nast\u00EDn\u011Bna z\u00E1kladn\u00ED kolize \u00FAstavn\u011B zaru\u010Den\u00FDch pr\u00E1v - pr\u00E1va na svobodu projevu a pr\u00E1va na ochranu cti a d\u016Fstojnosti. Po vz\u00E1jemn\u00E9m pom\u011B\u0159en\u00ED t\u011Bchto dvou z\u00E1kladn\u00EDch pr\u00E1v jsou nast\u00EDn\u011Bny dal\u0161\u00ED podm\u00EDnky pro vznik odpov\u011Bdnosti za \u0161kodu zp\u016Fsoben\u00E9 difama\u010Dn\u00EDm projevem se z\u0159etelem na zvl\u00E1\u0161tn\u00ED postaven\u00ED tisku v demokratick\u00E9 spole\u010Dnosti. V\u00FDznam pro mo\u017En\u00E9 posouzen\u00ED vzniku n\u00E1roku na n\u00E1hradu \u0161kody hraje i postaven\u00ED difamovan\u00E9 osoby, tj. zda se nejedn\u00E1 o osobu ve\u0159ejn\u011B zn\u00E1mou \u010Di ve\u0159ejn\u011B \u010Dinnou. Naposledy je zm\u00EDn\u011Bna problematika a rozd\u00EDl mezi hodnotov\u00FDm soudem a tvrzen\u00EDm fakt\u016F. S t\u00EDm je spojena ot\u00E1zka d\u016Fkazn\u00EDho b\u0159emene t\u00FDkaj\u00EDc\u00EDho se pravdivosti poskytovan\u00FDch informac\u00ED a povinnost\u00ED ov\u011B\u0159ovat pravdivost t\u011Bchto informac\u00ED ze strany m\u00E9di\u00ED. Z\u00E1v\u011Brem je v \u010Dl\u00E1nku uvedena kr\u00E1tk\u00E1 polemika t\u00FDkaj\u00EDc\u00ED se v\u00FD\u0161e p\u0159izn\u00E1van\u00E9 n\u00E1hrady \u0161kody v p\u0159\u00EDpadech difama\u010Dn\u00EDch projev\u016F a to zejm\u00E9na ve vztahu k \u00FAjm\u011B zp\u016Fsoben\u00E9 v osobnostn\u00EDch pr\u00E1vech \u010Dlov\u011Bka, zejm\u00E9na zda-li v\u00FD\u0161e n\u00E1hrady \u0161kody p\u0159izn\u00E1van\u00E9 \u010Desk\u00FDmi soudy, je dostate\u010Dn\u00E1."@cs . . "1"^^ . . "11"^^ . "Supplementum, prosinec 2013" .