. "Konfiska\u010Dn\u00ED dekrety prezidenta republiky. Spor o jejich interpretaci jako v\u00FDraz kontinuity a diskontinuity." . . "P\u0159\u00EDsp\u011Bvek se zab\u00FDv\u00E1 dobov\u00FDm i nov\u011Bj\u0161\u00EDm hodnocen\u00EDm konfiska\u010Dn\u00EDch dekret\u016F \u010D. 12 a 108/1945 Sb., p\u0159i\u010Dem\u017E existuje v z\u00E1sad\u011B dvoj\u00ED p\u0159\u00EDstup: prvn\u00ED m\u016F\u017Eeme pracovn\u011B ozna\u010Dit jako %22n\u00E1rodn\u00ED%22, druh\u00FD pak jako %22demokratick\u00FD%22. Odli\u0161uj\u00ED se ch\u00E1p\u00E1n\u00EDm pojmu konfiskace (trest \u010Di spr\u00E1vn\u00ED opat\u0159en\u00ED), n\u00E1rodnosti jako podm\u00EDnky konfiskac\u00ED (kolektivn\u00ED vina \u010Di odpov\u011Bdnost), vztahu konfiskac\u00ED a reparac\u00ED (ot\u00E1zka zapo\u010Dten\u00ED), kontinuity \u010Di diskontinuity s meziv\u00E1le\u010Dnou \u00E9rou a dal\u0161\u00EDmi. Oba maj\u00ED sv\u00E9 opodstatn\u011Bn\u00ED v dobov\u00E9 realit\u011B a m\u016F\u017Eeme je spojit s politiky, pr\u00E1vn\u00EDky \u010Di soudy. Zat\u00EDmco prvn\u00ED v\u00EDce odpov\u00EDd\u00E1 vlastn\u00EDmu zn\u011Bn\u00ED dekret\u016F, n\u00E1zor\u016Fm komunist\u016F a zvl\u00E1\u0161t\u011B ministra \u010Euri\u0161e, tak druh\u00FD navazuje na p\u0159edstavy prezidenta Bene\u0161e a je reflektov\u00E1n judikaturou \u00DAstavn\u00EDho soudu. V pov\u00E1le\u010Dn\u00E9 praxi se v\u0161ak oba p\u0159\u00EDstupy prostupovaly, resp. %22n\u00E1rodn\u00ED%22 byl modifikov\u00E1n a m\u00EDrn\u011Bn %22demokratick\u00FDm%22." . . "\u010Casopis pro pr\u00E1vn\u00ED v\u011Bdu a praxi" . "83264" . . . "Konfiska\u010Dn\u00ED dekrety prezidenta republiky. Spor o jejich interpretaci jako v\u00FDraz kontinuity a diskontinuity."@cs . "8"^^ . . . . . . . "I" . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . "Hor\u00E1k, Ond\u0159ej" . . "Konfiska\u010Dn\u00ED dekrety prezidenta republiky. Spor o jejich interpretaci jako v\u00FDraz kontinuity a diskontinuity." . . . . "Confiscatory Decrees of the President of the Republic. The controversy over the interpretation as an Expression of Continuity and Discontinuity."@en . "15220" . . "1"^^ . "[D87493302F58]" . . "Konfiska\u010Dn\u00ED dekrety prezidenta republiky. Spor o jejich interpretaci jako v\u00FDraz kontinuity a diskontinuity."@cs . "Supplementum" . . "21" . "P\u0159\u00EDsp\u011Bvek se zab\u00FDv\u00E1 dobov\u00FDm i nov\u011Bj\u0161\u00EDm hodnocen\u00EDm konfiska\u010Dn\u00EDch dekret\u016F \u010D. 12 a 108/1945 Sb., p\u0159i\u010Dem\u017E existuje v z\u00E1sad\u011B dvoj\u00ED p\u0159\u00EDstup: prvn\u00ED m\u016F\u017Eeme pracovn\u011B ozna\u010Dit jako %22n\u00E1rodn\u00ED%22, druh\u00FD pak jako %22demokratick\u00FD%22. Odli\u0161uj\u00ED se ch\u00E1p\u00E1n\u00EDm pojmu konfiskace (trest \u010Di spr\u00E1vn\u00ED opat\u0159en\u00ED), n\u00E1rodnosti jako podm\u00EDnky konfiskac\u00ED (kolektivn\u00ED vina \u010Di odpov\u011Bdnost), vztahu konfiskac\u00ED a reparac\u00ED (ot\u00E1zka zapo\u010Dten\u00ED), kontinuity \u010Di diskontinuity s meziv\u00E1le\u010Dnou \u00E9rou a dal\u0161\u00EDmi. Oba maj\u00ED sv\u00E9 opodstatn\u011Bn\u00ED v dobov\u00E9 realit\u011B a m\u016F\u017Eeme je spojit s politiky, pr\u00E1vn\u00EDky \u010Di soudy. Zat\u00EDmco prvn\u00ED v\u00EDce odpov\u00EDd\u00E1 vlastn\u00EDmu zn\u011Bn\u00ED dekret\u016F, n\u00E1zor\u016Fm komunist\u016F a zvl\u00E1\u0161t\u011B ministra \u010Euri\u0161e, tak druh\u00FD navazuje na p\u0159edstavy prezidenta Bene\u0161e a je reflektov\u00E1n judikaturou \u00DAstavn\u00EDho soudu. V pov\u00E1le\u010Dn\u00E9 praxi se v\u0161ak oba p\u0159\u00EDstupy prostupovaly, resp. %22n\u00E1rodn\u00ED%22 byl modifikov\u00E1n a m\u00EDrn\u011Bn %22demokratick\u00FDm%22."@cs . "RIV/61989592:15220/13:33146262" . "1"^^ . "Confiscatory Decrees of the President of the Republic. The controversy over the interpretation as an Expression of Continuity and Discontinuity."@en . "Bene\u0161, Confiscation, Continuity, Decrees, Discontinuity, Nationality, Property"@en . "1210-9126" . "RIV/61989592:15220/13:33146262!RIV14-MSM-15220___" . . "The paper is dealing with both contemporary and new assessment of confiscatory decrees No. 12 and 108/1945 Coll. There are two major approaches: the first one can be denominated as %22national%22, the other as %22democratical%22. The approaches differ from each other by interpretation of confiscation (punishment or administrative measure), nationality as a prerequisite for confiscation (collective guilt or responsibility), relation of confiscation and reparation (problem of recompense), continuity or discontinuity with pre-war era, etc. Both approaches are present in contemporary situation and can be identified with politicians, lawyers or courts. The %22national%22 one is more corresponding to the wording of the decrees, opinion of communists and especially minister \u010Euri\u0161. The %22democratic%22 one reflects the ideas of president Bene\u0161 and is reflected in decisions of The Constitutional Court. Both approaches were influencing each other in the post-war application, especially the %22national%22 one was modified and moderated by the %22democratic%22 one."@en .