. "RIV/61989592:15210/14:33152302!RIV15-MSM-15210___" . "Vesel\u00FD, Lubo\u0161" . "108"^^ . "Grammar Studies II"@en . "15210" . . "In each of the five chapters, I tried to contribute at least something new to thematized issues. In the first chapter I classify the elements of exhaustives into three groups according to their relationship to the semantic feature of the death of semantic participants of happening. In the second chapter, I conclude that the meaning of similarity can (without symptoms and with the help of context or consituation) without problems express perfectives whose secondary imperfectives could fundate distributive verbs. In the third chapter I criticize some of the arguments that have been presented for the benefit / detriment claim that in the current Czech language, there is accusative %22se%22. Finally, the fourth chapter is (among others) found that a transition of verbal adjectives to %22-\u00EDc\u00ED / -ouc\u00ED%22 from verb paradigm towards the part of speech noun can not be tested only on the basis of morphological, word formation and syntactic properties of the drive, but it must also take into account the frequency . The fifth chapter presents classification of exceptions to the morphological, syntactic and word formation rules, and in some cases I try to also formulate their causes."@en . . "Gramatick\u00E9 studie II" . . "1"^^ . . "18544" . "Gramatick\u00E9 studie II" . . "Gramatick\u00E9 studie II"@cs . . "Univerzita Palack\u00E9ho v Olomouci" . "Grammar Studies II"@en . "978-80-244-4347-8" . "Gramatick\u00E9 studie II" . "grammar studies, exhaustives, homonymy, pefectivs, imperfectivs"@en . . "1"^^ . . "Gramatick\u00E9 studie II"@cs . . "V ka\u017Ed\u00E9 z p\u011Bti kapitol jsem se sna\u017Eil p\u0159isp\u011Bt alespo\u0148 n\u011B\u010D\u00EDm nov\u00FDm k tematizovan\u00E9 problematice. Sv\u00E9 z\u00E1v\u011Bry uvedu po kapitol\u00E1ch a pouze v\u00FDb\u011Brov\u011B. V prvn\u00ED kapitole rozd\u011Bluji prvky mno\u017Einy exhaustiv do t\u0159\u00ED skupin podle jejich vztahu k v\u00FDznamov\u00E9mu rysu usmrcen\u00ED s\u00E9mantick\u00E9ho participantu d\u011Bje. V druh\u00E9 kapitole doch\u00E1z\u00EDm k z\u00E1v\u011Bru, \u017Ee p\u0159\u00ED\u010Dinou sp\u00ED\u0161e jen v\u00FDjime\u010Dn\u00E9ho p\u0159itv\u00E1\u0159en\u00ED nov\u00FDch pod\u00EDln\u00FDch sloves nen\u00ED ani tak p\u0159\u00EDpadn\u00FD vznik homonymie (povytahovat tah\u00E1k z pen\u00E1lu vs. povytahovat v\u0161echny raj\u010Datov\u00E9 ke\u0159\u00EDky), jako mnohem sp\u00ED\u0161e to, \u017Ee v\u00FDznam podobnosti mohou (bezp\u0159\u00EDznakov\u011B a za pomoci kontextu \u010Di konsituace) bez probl\u00E9m\u016F vyjad\u0159ovat i perfektiva, jejich\u017E sekund\u00E1rn\u00ED imperfektiva by mohla fundovat distributivn\u00ED slovesa (Rozdal jim pap\u00EDry vs. Porozd\u00E1val jim pap\u00EDry). Ve t\u0159et\u00ED kapitole podrobuji kritice n\u011Bkter\u00E9 argumenty, kter\u00E9 byly p\u0159edlo\u017Eeny ve prosp\u011Bch / v neprosp\u011Bch tvrzen\u00ED, \u017Ee v sou\u010Dasn\u00E9 \u010De\u0161tin\u011B existuje akuzativn\u00ED %22se%22. Z\u00E1v\u011Brem \u010Dtvrt\u00E9 kapitoly je (mimo jin\u00E9) zji\u0161t\u011Bn\u00ED, \u017Ee m\u00EDru p\u0159echodu verb\u00E1ln\u00EDch adjektiv na -\u00EDc\u00ED/-ouc\u00ED z paradigmatu slovesa sm\u011Brem k slovn\u00EDmu druhu substantivum nelze testovat jen na z\u00E1klad\u011B morfologick\u00FDch, slovotvorn\u00FDch a syntaktick\u00FDch vlastnost\u00ED dan\u00E9 jednotky, ale je t\u0159eba p\u0159ihl\u00ED\u017Eet tak\u00E9 k frekvenci. V kapitole p\u00E1t\u00E9 p\u0159edstavuji klasifikaci v\u00FDjimek z morfologick\u00FDch, slovotvorn\u00FDch a syntaktick\u00FDch pravidel a v n\u011Bkter\u00FDch p\u0159\u00EDpadech se pokou\u0161\u00EDm i o zformulov\u00E1n\u00ED jejich p\u0159\u00ED\u010Din." . . "108"^^ . "RIV/61989592:15210/14:33152302" . . "Edice QFWFQ, svazek 23." . . "O" . . "V ka\u017Ed\u00E9 z p\u011Bti kapitol jsem se sna\u017Eil p\u0159isp\u011Bt alespo\u0148 n\u011B\u010D\u00EDm nov\u00FDm k tematizovan\u00E9 problematice. Sv\u00E9 z\u00E1v\u011Bry uvedu po kapitol\u00E1ch a pouze v\u00FDb\u011Brov\u011B. V prvn\u00ED kapitole rozd\u011Bluji prvky mno\u017Einy exhaustiv do t\u0159\u00ED skupin podle jejich vztahu k v\u00FDznamov\u00E9mu rysu usmrcen\u00ED s\u00E9mantick\u00E9ho participantu d\u011Bje. V druh\u00E9 kapitole doch\u00E1z\u00EDm k z\u00E1v\u011Bru, \u017Ee p\u0159\u00ED\u010Dinou sp\u00ED\u0161e jen v\u00FDjime\u010Dn\u00E9ho p\u0159itv\u00E1\u0159en\u00ED nov\u00FDch pod\u00EDln\u00FDch sloves nen\u00ED ani tak p\u0159\u00EDpadn\u00FD vznik homonymie (povytahovat tah\u00E1k z pen\u00E1lu vs. povytahovat v\u0161echny raj\u010Datov\u00E9 ke\u0159\u00EDky), jako mnohem sp\u00ED\u0161e to, \u017Ee v\u00FDznam podobnosti mohou (bezp\u0159\u00EDznakov\u011B a za pomoci kontextu \u010Di konsituace) bez probl\u00E9m\u016F vyjad\u0159ovat i perfektiva, jejich\u017E sekund\u00E1rn\u00ED imperfektiva by mohla fundovat distributivn\u00ED slovesa (Rozdal jim pap\u00EDry vs. Porozd\u00E1val jim pap\u00EDry). Ve t\u0159et\u00ED kapitole podrobuji kritice n\u011Bkter\u00E9 argumenty, kter\u00E9 byly p\u0159edlo\u017Eeny ve prosp\u011Bch / v neprosp\u011Bch tvrzen\u00ED, \u017Ee v sou\u010Dasn\u00E9 \u010De\u0161tin\u011B existuje akuzativn\u00ED %22se%22. Z\u00E1v\u011Brem \u010Dtvrt\u00E9 kapitoly je (mimo jin\u00E9) zji\u0161t\u011Bn\u00ED, \u017Ee m\u00EDru p\u0159echodu verb\u00E1ln\u00EDch adjektiv na -\u00EDc\u00ED/-ouc\u00ED z paradigmatu slovesa sm\u011Brem k slovn\u00EDmu druhu substantivum nelze testovat jen na z\u00E1klad\u011B morfologick\u00FDch, slovotvorn\u00FDch a syntaktick\u00FDch vlastnost\u00ED dan\u00E9 jednotky, ale je t\u0159eba p\u0159ihl\u00ED\u017Eet tak\u00E9 k frekvenci. V kapitole p\u00E1t\u00E9 p\u0159edstavuji klasifikaci v\u00FDjimek z morfologick\u00FDch, slovotvorn\u00FDch a syntaktick\u00FDch pravidel a v n\u011Bkter\u00FDch p\u0159\u00EDpadech se pokou\u0161\u00EDm i o zformulov\u00E1n\u00ED jejich p\u0159\u00ED\u010Din."@cs . . . "[BA3DE6A433D1]" . "Olomouc" .