. "Religio" . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . "26"^^ . . . . . "Existuje v Japonsku n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED? Kategorie n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED a postmodern\u00ED kritika v soci\u00E1ln\u00EDch v\u011Bd\u00E1ch"@cs . . . "RIV/61989592:15210/13:33147885" . "73917" . "RIV/61989592:15210/13:33147885!RIV14-MSM-15210___" . "Existuje v Japonsku n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED? Kategorie n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED a postmodern\u00ED kritika v soci\u00E1ln\u00EDch v\u011Bd\u00E1ch" . . . . "I" . . "15210" . . "2013" . . . . "\u010Cl\u00E1nek se zab\u00FDv\u00E1 problematikou u\u017E\u00EDv\u00E1n\u00ED koncept\u016F a kategori\u00ED v soci\u00E1ln\u00EDch v\u011Bd\u00E1ch, se zvl\u00E1\u0161tn\u00EDm z\u0159etelem k pojmu n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED. Tento pojem se stal p\u0159edm\u011Btem kritick\u00FDch anal\u00FDz \u0159ady autor\u016F, nap\u0159. T. Fitzgeralda, R. T. McCutcheona \u010Di D. Dubuissona. Kritikov\u00E9 vn\u00EDmaj\u00ED pojem n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED jako manipulativn\u00ED a p\u0159edsude\u010Dn\u00FD sociokulturn\u00ED konstrukt, jeho\u017E p\u016Fvod je nutno hledat ve zcela specifick\u00E9m prost\u0159ed\u00ED %22z\u00E1padn\u00ED%22 (tedy eruoamerick\u00E9 \u010Di na k\u0159es\u0165ansk\u00FDch z\u00E1kladech spo\u010D\u00EDvaj\u00EDc\u00ED) kultury a spole\u010Dnosti. Kritika pojmu n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED coby sociokulturn\u00EDho konstruktu v\u0161ak nemus\u00ED automaticky znamenat i to, \u017Ee samotn\u00FD koncept by nem\u011Bl b\u00FDt badateli v soci\u00E1ln\u00EDch v\u011Bd\u00E1ch vyu\u017E\u00EDv\u00E1n. Kritika pojmu n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED nemus\u00ED v\u00E9st k p\u0159esv\u011Bd\u010Den\u00ED, \u017Ee je zcela neu\u017Eite\u010Dn\u00FD k popisu a anal\u00FDze spole\u010Densk\u00FDch a kulturn\u00EDch jev\u016F mimo kontext z\u00E1padn\u00ED kultury. \u010Cl\u00E1nek se op\u00EDr\u00E1 o p\u0159\u00EDklady z oblasti japonsk\u00E9ho sociokulturn\u00EDho prost\u0159ed\u00ED. S ohledem na japonsk\u00E9 prost\u0159ed\u00ED, nem\u016F\u017Ee b\u00FDt pojem n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED (\u0161\u00FAkj\u00F3) jednodu\u0161e prohla\u0161ov\u00E1n za import ze Z\u00E1padu, nebo\u0165 m\u00E1 hlub\u0161\u00ED historick\u00E9 ko\u0159eny p\u0159\u00EDmo v samotn\u00E9m japonsk\u00E9m prost\u0159ed\u00ED. Je jist\u00E9, \u017Ee obsah a rozsah pojmu n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED v japonsk\u00E9m kontextu pro\u0161el prom\u011Bnami, kter\u00E9 nebyly bez hlubok\u00E9ho vlivu kulturn\u00ED v\u00FDm\u011Bny s euroamerickou sociokulturn\u00ED oblast\u00ED. To v\u0161ak samo o sob\u011B nen\u00ED d\u016Fvodem pro to, abychom pojem n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED odsoudili coby mocenskopolitick\u00FD n\u00E1stroj koloni\u00E1ln\u00EDch mocnost\u00ED. Z\u00E1rove\u0148 je zjevn\u00E9, \u017Ee pojem n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED si zachov\u00E1v\u00E1 sv\u016Fj v\u00FDznam pro popis a anal\u00FDzu sociokulturn\u00EDch jev\u016F."@cs . "Existuje v Japonsku n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED? Kategorie n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED a postmodern\u00ED kritika v soci\u00E1ln\u00EDch v\u011Bd\u00E1ch"@cs . . "1"^^ . "1"^^ . "This article deals with the issue of using concepts and categories in social sciences with particular focus on the concept of %22religion%22. This concept has been critically analyzed by several authors, e.g. by Timothy Fitzgerald, Russell T. McCutcheon and Daniel Dubuisson. The category of religion is seen by its critics as a biased and manipulative socio-cultural construct, originating in the specific social and cultural environment of Western (Euro-American, Christianity-based) environment. The critique of the notion of religion as a socio-culturally constructed concept does not necessarily mean that the concept itself should be abandoned or that it is of no practical use for the description and analysis of non-Western social and cultural phenomena. This contention is evidenced with examples from the Japanese context. The notion of religion (shukyo) cannot be easily proclaimed to be a Western import to Japan; it has older roots in Japanese history. The extent and content of this concept, as well as its place in a wider conceptual network, have certainly been transformed in the process of cultural exchange with different Euro-American environments but this does not imply that this concept is simply a tool of any colonial power whatsoever nor does it preclude its analytical usefulness."@en . "\u010Cl\u00E1nek se zab\u00FDv\u00E1 problematikou u\u017E\u00EDv\u00E1n\u00ED koncept\u016F a kategori\u00ED v soci\u00E1ln\u00EDch v\u011Bd\u00E1ch, se zvl\u00E1\u0161tn\u00EDm z\u0159etelem k pojmu n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED. Tento pojem se stal p\u0159edm\u011Btem kritick\u00FDch anal\u00FDz \u0159ady autor\u016F, nap\u0159. T. Fitzgeralda, R. T. McCutcheona \u010Di D. Dubuissona. Kritikov\u00E9 vn\u00EDmaj\u00ED pojem n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED jako manipulativn\u00ED a p\u0159edsude\u010Dn\u00FD sociokulturn\u00ED konstrukt, jeho\u017E p\u016Fvod je nutno hledat ve zcela specifick\u00E9m prost\u0159ed\u00ED %22z\u00E1padn\u00ED%22 (tedy eruoamerick\u00E9 \u010Di na k\u0159es\u0165ansk\u00FDch z\u00E1kladech spo\u010D\u00EDvaj\u00EDc\u00ED) kultury a spole\u010Dnosti. Kritika pojmu n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED coby sociokulturn\u00EDho konstruktu v\u0161ak nemus\u00ED automaticky znamenat i to, \u017Ee samotn\u00FD koncept by nem\u011Bl b\u00FDt badateli v soci\u00E1ln\u00EDch v\u011Bd\u00E1ch vyu\u017E\u00EDv\u00E1n. Kritika pojmu n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED nemus\u00ED v\u00E9st k p\u0159esv\u011Bd\u010Den\u00ED, \u017Ee je zcela neu\u017Eite\u010Dn\u00FD k popisu a anal\u00FDze spole\u010Densk\u00FDch a kulturn\u00EDch jev\u016F mimo kontext z\u00E1padn\u00ED kultury. \u010Cl\u00E1nek se op\u00EDr\u00E1 o p\u0159\u00EDklady z oblasti japonsk\u00E9ho sociokulturn\u00EDho prost\u0159ed\u00ED. S ohledem na japonsk\u00E9 prost\u0159ed\u00ED, nem\u016F\u017Ee b\u00FDt pojem n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED (\u0161\u00FAkj\u00F3) jednodu\u0161e prohla\u0161ov\u00E1n za import ze Z\u00E1padu, nebo\u0165 m\u00E1 hlub\u0161\u00ED historick\u00E9 ko\u0159eny p\u0159\u00EDmo v samotn\u00E9m japonsk\u00E9m prost\u0159ed\u00ED. Je jist\u00E9, \u017Ee obsah a rozsah pojmu n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED v japonsk\u00E9m kontextu pro\u0161el prom\u011Bnami, kter\u00E9 nebyly bez hlubok\u00E9ho vlivu kulturn\u00ED v\u00FDm\u011Bny s euroamerickou sociokulturn\u00ED oblast\u00ED. To v\u0161ak samo o sob\u011B nen\u00ED d\u016Fvodem pro to, abychom pojem n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED odsoudili coby mocenskopolitick\u00FD n\u00E1stroj koloni\u00E1ln\u00EDch mocnost\u00ED. Z\u00E1rove\u0148 je zjevn\u00E9, \u017Ee pojem n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED si zachov\u00E1v\u00E1 sv\u016Fj v\u00FDznam pro popis a anal\u00FDzu sociokulturn\u00EDch jev\u016F." . "Is There any Religion in Japan? The Category of Religion and Postmodern Critique in Social Sciences"@en . "Existuje v Japonsku n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED? Kategorie n\u00E1bo\u017Eenstv\u00ED a postmodern\u00ED kritika v soci\u00E1ln\u00EDch v\u011Bd\u00E1ch" . . "2" . . "Havl\u00ED\u010Dek, Jakub" . . "Is There any Religion in Japan? The Category of Religion and Postmodern Critique in Social Sciences"@en . . . "1210-3640" . "epistemology, postmodernism and social sciences, criticism of postcolonial scholarship, religion, religion in Japan, religionistika, shykyo, scientific study of religion, social constructivism"@en . "[5E8C2E732D07]" .