"V\u00FDznam Jesseniova filosofick\u00E9ho d\u00EDla wittenbersk\u00E9ho obdob\u00ED ve vztahu k sask\u00E9mu kurfi\u0159tovi"@cs . "RIV/61989592:15210/12:33141156" . . "15210" . "V\u00FDznam Jesseniova filosofick\u00E9ho d\u00EDla wittenbersk\u00E9ho obdob\u00ED ve vztahu k sask\u00E9mu kurfi\u0159tovi" . . "The importance of Jessenius' philosophical works during his Wittenberg period in relation to the Saxon Elector"@en . "C\u00EDlem p\u0159\u00EDsp\u011Bvku je uk\u00E1zat, jak vybran\u00E9 filosofick\u00E9 spisy Jana Jessenia, kter\u00E9 vzniky v tzv. wittenbersk\u00E9m obdob\u00ED, vykazuj\u00ED vztah k sask\u00E9m vl\u00E1dci Friedrichu Wilhelmu I. Anal\u00FDza dedikac\u00ED spis\u016F Zoroaster, Nova brevis veraque de Universo philosophia a publikace Girolama Savonaroly Epitome universalis Philosophiae, ukazuj\u00ED, jak Jessenius v\u011B\u0159il v podporu filosofie od sask\u00E9ho vl\u00E1dce. A\u010Dkoli podle n\u011Bkter\u00FDch interpretac\u00ED Jessenius %22lutheranizoval%22 sv\u00E9 zdroje, zd\u00E1 se, \u017Ee konfesion\u00E1ln\u00ED aspekt jeho spisy postr\u00E1daj\u00ED. A\u0165 se jednalo a recepci zoroastrismu a hermetismu nebo o tomistick\u00FD aristotelismus, v\u017Edy jsou prezentov\u00E1ny zp\u016Fsobem, kter\u00FD mohl b\u00FDt v lutherskou ortodoxi\u00ED v rozporu. Jessenius implicitn\u011B se pova\u017Euje za promotora my\u0161lenky sjednocen\u00ED filosofick\u00FDch sm\u011Br\u016F, kterou p\u0159evzal od sv\u00E9ho u\u010Ditele Franceska Piccolominiho. Tato idea byla luthersk\u00E9mu prost\u0159ed\u00ED ciz\u00ED."@cs . . "C\u00EDlem p\u0159\u00EDsp\u011Bvku je uk\u00E1zat, jak vybran\u00E9 filosofick\u00E9 spisy Jana Jessenia, kter\u00E9 vzniky v tzv. wittenbersk\u00E9m obdob\u00ED, vykazuj\u00ED vztah k sask\u00E9m vl\u00E1dci Friedrichu Wilhelmu I. Anal\u00FDza dedikac\u00ED spis\u016F Zoroaster, Nova brevis veraque de Universo philosophia a publikace Girolama Savonaroly Epitome universalis Philosophiae, ukazuj\u00ED, jak Jessenius v\u011B\u0159il v podporu filosofie od sask\u00E9ho vl\u00E1dce. A\u010Dkoli podle n\u011Bkter\u00FDch interpretac\u00ED Jessenius %22lutheranizoval%22 sv\u00E9 zdroje, zd\u00E1 se, \u017Ee konfesion\u00E1ln\u00ED aspekt jeho spisy postr\u00E1daj\u00ED. A\u0165 se jednalo a recepci zoroastrismu a hermetismu nebo o tomistick\u00FD aristotelismus, v\u017Edy jsou prezentov\u00E1ny zp\u016Fsobem, kter\u00FD mohl b\u00FDt v lutherskou ortodoxi\u00ED v rozporu. Jessenius implicitn\u011B se pova\u017Euje za promotora my\u0161lenky sjednocen\u00ED filosofick\u00FDch sm\u011Br\u016F, kterou p\u0159evzal od sv\u00E9ho u\u010Ditele Franceska Piccolominiho. Tato idea byla luthersk\u00E9mu prost\u0159ed\u00ED ciz\u00ED." . "V\u00FDznam Jesseniova filosofick\u00E9ho d\u00EDla wittenbersk\u00E9ho obdob\u00ED ve vztahu k sask\u00E9mu kurfi\u0159tovi"@cs . . . . . "2011-09-13+02:00"^^ . "V\u00FDznam Jesseniova filosofick\u00E9ho d\u00EDla wittenbersk\u00E9ho obdob\u00ED ve vztahu k sask\u00E9mu kurfi\u0159tovi" . "h e aim of this paper is to show how the selected philosophical writings of J\u00E1n Jessenius, originated during so called Wittenberg period, show their relationship to the Saxon ruler Friedrich Wilhelm I. The analysis of dedications of treatise Zoroaster, Nova brevis veraque de Universo philosophia and Girolamo Savonarola's publication Epitome universalis Philosophiae, and the way, in which Jessenius appeals to the Saxon ruler, show us how much hope did Jessenius put in the sovereign in terms of supporting the development of philosophy. Although according to some interpretations Jessenius %22lutheranized%22 his sources ( Francesco Patrizi and Girolamo Savonarola), it seems that the confessional aspect is scarce in his writings. Whether it is a reception of Zoroastrianism and Hermeticism, or h omistic Aristotelianism, it always appears with features tThe aim of this paper is to show how the selected philosophical writings of J\u00E1n Jessenius, originated during so called Wittenberg period, show their relationship to the Saxon ruler Friedrich Wilhelm I. The analysis of dedications of treatise Zoroaster nova brevis veraque de Universo philosophia and Girolamo Savonarola's publication Epitome universalis Philosophiae, and the way, in which Jessenius appeals to the Saxon ruler, show us how much hope did Jessenius put in the sovereign in terms of supporting the development of philosophy. Although according to some interpretations Jessenius %22lutheranized%22 his sources ( Francesco Patrizi and Girolamo Savonarola), it seems that the confessional aspect is scarce in his writings. Whether it is a reception of Zoroastrianism and Hermeticism, or Thomistic Aristotelianism, it always appears with features that might be in con?ict with Lutheran orthodoxy. Jessenius implicitly reveals himself as a promoter of idea of uni?cation of philosophical orientations, which he adopted from his teacher Francesco Piccolomini. The idea was alien to the Lutheran environment."@en . . "Martin" . . . "The importance of Jessenius' philosophical works during his Wittenberg period in relation to the Saxon Elector"@en . "[31A95541B8EF]" . "RIV/61989592:15210/12:33141156!RIV13-MSM-15210___" . "Slovensk\u00E1 n\u00E1rodn\u00E1 kni\u017Enica" . "P(EE2.3.20.0026)" . . "180195" . . "10"^^ . "978-80-8149-002-6" . "1"^^ . . "Lutheranism; philosophy; 16th Century; Wittenberg; John of Jessen"@en . . . "Nejeschleba, Tom\u00E1\u0161" . "Martin, Slovensko" . "1"^^ . . . "J\u00E1n Jessenius. Slov\u00E1ci na panovnick\u00FDch dvoroch" . . .