"The paper dials with comparison of 3D and 2.5D finite element simulation principles by the example of modeling of round shape billet rolling. The results of simulation using both methods are presented. The deformation fields as well as calculated geometric parameters of the billet and assessment of error are considered."@en . "Comparison of 3d and 2.5d finite element simulation principles for rolling in grooves modeling"@en . "Comparison of 3d and 2.5d finite element simulation principles for rolling in grooves modeling" . "RIV/61989100:27360/07:00015953" . . "7" . "Kliber, Ji\u0159\u00ED" . "PL - Polsk\u00E1 republika" . "27360" . . . "FEM; 3D; 2.5D; rolling; comparison; Forge; SPLEN; mathematic simulation"@en . . . "[3FB9B52CD0CB]" . . . "The paper dials with comparison of 3D and 2.5D finite element simulation principles by the example of modeling of round shape billet rolling. The results of simulation using both methods are presented. The deformation fields as well as calculated geometric parameters of the billet and assessment of error are considered." . . "1"^^ . . "5"^^ . "1641-8581" . . . . . "3"^^ . . "2" . . . "Comparison of 3d and 2.5d finite element simulation principles for rolling in grooves modeling" . "Aksenov, Sergey" . . "Porovn\u00E1n\u00ED 3D a 2.5D metodik p\u0159i matematick\u00E9m modelov\u00E1n\u00ED v\u00E1lcov\u00E1n\u00ED v kalibrech."@cs . "Computer methods in materials science" . . . "Chumachenko, Nikolaj" . "RIV/61989100:27360/07:00015953!RIV09-MSM-27360___" . . "P(GA106/04/0601), P(GA106/04/1452), Z(MSM6198910015)" . "Comparison of 3d and 2.5d finite element simulation principles for rolling in grooves modeling"@en . . . "Porovn\u00E1n\u00ED 3D a 2.5D metodik p\u0159i matematick\u00E9m modelov\u00E1n\u00ED v\u00E1lcov\u00E1n\u00ED v kalibrech."@cs . . "V tomto \u010Dl\u00E1nku je prezentov\u00E1no porovn\u00E1n\u00ED 3D a 2.5D metodik p\u0159i matematick\u00E9m modelov\u00E1n\u00ED nap\u011B\u0165ov\u011B-deforma\u010Dn\u00EDho stavu p\u0159i v\u00E1lcov\u00E1n\u00ED ty\u010De. Jsou ude\u0159eny v\u00FDsledky obou metod. Popsan\u00E9 rozlo\u017Een\u00ED nap\u011B\u0165ov\u011B-deforma\u010Dn\u00EDch charakteristik a porovn\u00E1ni geometrick\u00FDch parametr\u016F provalku."@cs . "414451" .