. "Copernicus Center Press" . "27240" . "Krakow" . . . "60214" . "1"^^ . . . . . . "RIV/61989100:27240/13:86087306" . . "1"^^ . "Ambiguities in natural language and ontological proofs"@en . "[FEE84C0FB2A0]" . "Logic in theology" . "308"^^ . "Ambiguities in natural language and ontological proofs"@en . "Ambiguities in natural language and ontological proofs" . . "20"^^ . "In this paper I propose a solution to the dispute over Strawsonian vs. Russellian definite descriptions. Based on the analysis of the problem of ambiguities stemming from different topic-focus articulation I present a solution. Moreover I present generalization of the method of topic-focus disambiguation to sentences containing not only definite descriptions but also general terms occurring with different suppositions. To this end I make use of the strict analysis and definition of the if-then-else function. I also analyse a common fault that can be found in ontological proofs of God\u2019s existence, with the exception of Anselm\u2019s argument of Proslogion III, where St. Anselm carefully avoids this mistake." . . "978-83-7886-006-8" . . . "topic-focus articulation; ontological proof; ambiguities; TIL; natural language analysis"@en . . "Ambiguities in natural language and ontological proofs" . "RIV/61989100:27240/13:86087306!RIV14-MSM-27240___" . "Du\u017E\u00ED, Marie" . "S" . . . "In this paper I propose a solution to the dispute over Strawsonian vs. Russellian definite descriptions. Based on the analysis of the problem of ambiguities stemming from different topic-focus articulation I present a solution. Moreover I present generalization of the method of topic-focus disambiguation to sentences containing not only definite descriptions but also general terms occurring with different suppositions. To this end I make use of the strict analysis and definition of the if-then-else function. I also analyse a common fault that can be found in ontological proofs of God\u2019s existence, with the exception of Anselm\u2019s argument of Proslogion III, where St. Anselm carefully avoids this mistake."@en . .