"0"^^ . . . . "1"^^ . "0"^^ . "P(GA401/03/1403)" . . "Kitakyushu" . . "16"^^ . . "concepts, ontologies, meaning, natural language, conceptual lattices"@en . "Du\u017E\u00ED, Marie" . . "601977" . . "European-Japanese conference on Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases" . "Traditional, intuitive conceptions of concepts and their shortcomings are summarised first. We pose five worrisome questions, answering which becomes extremely important when we want to build ontologies of particular domains of interest, to #conceptualise# them and to perform a terminological classification, which should be used for an intelligent search in the huge amount of data on web pages. Since traditional, set-theoretical concept theories do not answer these questions in a satisfactory way, we introduce a new non-traditional theory of concepts. A concept is explicated by the key notion of Transparent intensional logic # logical construction, i.e. structured procedure. We show that between an expression (of any language) and the denoted object beyond the language (denotatum) there is just the meaning of the expression, i.e. the respective concept, which identifies (or fails to identify # in case of empty concepts) the denotatum. Whereas the denotatum is a #flat# set-theoretical entity (intension"@en . . . "27240" . . . "RIV/61989100:27240/03:00008360!RIV/2004/GA0/272404/N" . . . "Kyushu Institute of Technology" . . "Concepts, Language and Ontologies" . . "197-212" . "[671C20F9B715]" . "Traditional, intuitive conceptions of concepts and their shortcomings are summarised first. We pose five worrisome questions, answering which becomes extremely important when we want to build ontologies of particular domains of interest, to #conceptualise# them and to perform a terminological classification, which should be used for an intelligent search in the huge amount of data on web pages. Since traditional, set-theoretical concept theories do not answer these questions in a satisfactory way, we introduce a new non-traditional theory of concepts. A concept is explicated by the key notion of Transparent intensional logic # logical construction, i.e. structured procedure. We show that between an expression (of any language) and the denoted object beyond the language (denotatum) there is just the meaning of the expression, i.e. the respective concept, which identifies (or fails to identify # in case of empty concepts) the denotatum. Whereas the denotatum is a #flat# set-theoretical entity (intension" . "Kitakyushu, Japan" . "Concepts, Language and Ontologies"@en . "2003-01-01+01:00"^^ . "Concepts, Language and Ontologies" . "1"^^ . "RIV/61989100:27240/03:00008360" . "Concepts, Language and Ontologies"@en . . .