"V praxi nen\u00ED \u017E\u00E1dn\u00FD p\u0159\u00EDstroj ani metoda naprosto p\u0159esn\u00FD. Dlouholet\u00E1 praxe ust\u00E1lila zvyk p\u0159i vyhodnocov\u00E1n\u00ED nam\u011B\u0159en\u00FDch hodnot pracovat s chybami. Chyby se rozd\u011Bluj\u00ED podle r\u016Fzn\u00FDch hledisek. Z hlediska jejich zdroj\u016F se d\u011Bl\u00ED na chyby p\u0159\u00EDstroje, metody, pozorov\u00E1n\u00ED a vyhodnocen\u00ED. Z hlediska p\u016Fsoben\u00ED se rozd\u011Bluj\u00ED chyby na systematick\u00E9, n\u00E1hodn\u00E9 a hrub\u00E9. Chyby pozorov\u00E1n\u00ED jsou zap\u0159\u00ED\u010Din\u011Bny nedokonalost\u00ED smysl\u016F pozorovatele nebo jeho nesoust\u0159ed\u011Bnosti a chyby vyhodnocen\u00ED maj\u00ED sv\u016Fj p\u016Fvod v aplikov\u00E1n\u00ED p\u0159ibli\u017En\u00FDch vztah\u016F, zjednodu\u0161en\u00ED, zaokrouhlov\u00E1n\u00ED apod. ve v\u00FDpo\u010Dtech. V sou\u010Dasnosti se v metrologii a p\u0159i technick\u00FDch m\u011B\u0159en\u00EDch u\u017E\u00EDv\u00E1 nov\u00FDch p\u0159\u00EDstup\u016F vyjad\u0159ov\u00E1n\u00ED odchylek a chyby m\u011B\u0159en\u00ED jsou nahrazov\u00E1ny nejistotou m\u011B\u0159en\u00ED" . . "1" . "17450" . ". Evaluation of accuracy of the body composition measurements by the BIA method"@en . "V" . . "12" . . "2"^^ . "1732-3991" . "5"^^ . . "Gajda, Vojt\u011Bch" . . . "2"^^ . "RIV/61988987:17450/11:A110112N!RIV11-MSM-17450___" . . "Kut\u00E1\u010D, Petr" . . . "RIV/61988987:17450/11:A110112N" . . . ". Evaluation of accuracy of the body composition measurements by the BIA method" . "198263" . . ". Evaluation of accuracy of the body composition measurements by the BIA method"@en . . "[8AF53F5EA95C]" . "PL - Polsk\u00E1 republika" . . ". Evaluation of accuracy of the body composition measurements by the BIA method" . "V praxi nen\u00ED \u017E\u00E1dn\u00FD p\u0159\u00EDstroj ani metoda naprosto p\u0159esn\u00FD. Dlouholet\u00E1 praxe ust\u00E1lila zvyk p\u0159i vyhodnocov\u00E1n\u00ED nam\u011B\u0159en\u00FDch hodnot pracovat s chybami. Chyby se rozd\u011Bluj\u00ED podle r\u016Fzn\u00FDch hledisek. Z hlediska jejich zdroj\u016F se d\u011Bl\u00ED na chyby p\u0159\u00EDstroje, metody, pozorov\u00E1n\u00ED a vyhodnocen\u00ED. Z hlediska p\u016Fsoben\u00ED se rozd\u011Bluj\u00ED chyby na systematick\u00E9, n\u00E1hodn\u00E9 a hrub\u00E9. Chyby pozorov\u00E1n\u00ED jsou zap\u0159\u00ED\u010Din\u011Bny nedokonalost\u00ED smysl\u016F pozorovatele nebo jeho nesoust\u0159ed\u011Bnosti a chyby vyhodnocen\u00ED maj\u00ED sv\u016Fj p\u016Fvod v aplikov\u00E1n\u00ED p\u0159ibli\u017En\u00FDch vztah\u016F, zjednodu\u0161en\u00ED, zaokrouhlov\u00E1n\u00ED apod. ve v\u00FDpo\u010Dtech. V sou\u010Dasnosti se v metrologii a p\u0159i technick\u00FDch m\u011B\u0159en\u00EDch u\u017E\u00EDv\u00E1 nov\u00FDch p\u0159\u00EDstup\u016F vyjad\u0159ov\u00E1n\u00ED odchylek a chyby m\u011B\u0159en\u00ED jsou nahrazov\u00E1ny nejistotou m\u011B\u0159en\u00ED"@en . "Human Movement" . . . . "The main purpose of this study is to verify the accuracy of body composition measurements by the BIA method; using TANITA 418 MA unit. Basic procedures. For purposes of our study we decided to use the type-A uncertainty evaluation method (statistical processing of measured data). To formulate diagnostic error for the BIA method we used typical (standard) error of measurement from differences between pairs of repeated measurements - which is in principle a mean error of the test. The research was carried out on a group of 10 students whose field of study is physical education and sport. These students were chosen from the total number of 74 students in such a way that they represent as wide range of fat fraction as possible. Representation of their fat fraction oscillated between 9.0 to 31.2% of body fat. Input value of body fat; which was the basic criterion for selection of students to the measurement etalon; was determined by the DEXA method."@en .