. "P(GA205/09/1159), S" . "2D mapy, 2,5D modely ter\u00E9nu, 3D vizualizace jsou p\u0159\u00EDklady pojmenov\u00E1n\u00ED, kter\u00FDch se hojn\u011B pou\u017E\u00EDv\u00E1 v informatice, geografii, kartografii, a tak\u00E9 v geoinformatice. Je diskutov\u00E1na pouze problematika trojrozm\u011Brn\u00E9ho geometrick\u00E9ho prostoru, tedy bez uva\u017Eov\u00E1n\u00ED \u010Dasu a dal\u0161\u00EDch dimenz\u00ED. Auto\u0159i cht\u011Bj\u00ED upozornit na myln\u00E9 a mnohdy nesmysln\u00E9 pou\u017E\u00EDv\u00E1n\u00ED term\u00EDn\u016F t\u00FDkaj\u00EDc\u00EDch se vyj\u00E1d\u0159en\u00ED prostoru. P\u016Fvodn\u00ED a spr\u00E1vn\u011B my\u0161len\u00E9 n\u00E1zvy vznikl\u00E9 v oboru informatiky p\u0159i zpracov\u00E1n\u00ED prostorov\u00FDch dat byly p\u0159eneseny i do oblasti vizualizace, ve kter\u00E9 jsou v mnoha p\u0159\u00EDpadech neopodstatn\u011Bn\u00E9 a nespr\u00E1vn\u00E9. P\u0159\u00EDkladem, \u010Dasto u\u017E\u00EDvan\u00FDm i v odborn\u00E9 literatu\u0159e, m\u016F\u017Ee b\u00FDt ozna\u010Dov\u00E1n\u00ED perspektivn\u00EDho pr\u016Fm\u011Btu jako 3D zobrazen\u00ED apod. D\u00E1le p\u0159\u00EDsp\u011Bvek upozor\u0148uje na kolizi v pou\u017E\u00EDv\u00E1n\u00ED t\u011Bchto term\u00EDn\u016F. P\u0159esto, \u017Ee jsou pojmy ji\u017E za\u017Eit\u00E9, auto\u0159i doporu\u010Duj\u00ED zm\u011Bnu, zejm\u00E9na vzhledem k dal\u0161\u00EDmu technologick\u00E9mu v\u00FDvoji v oblasti vizualizace prostorov\u00FDch dat." . . . "1212-0014" . "2D; 2; 5D; 3D; visualization; space"@en . "Du\u0161ek, Radek" . "Visualization of geospatial data: chaos in the dimensions"@en . "Vizualizace prostorov\u00FDch dat: chaos v dimenz\u00EDch" . . "2D mapy, 2,5D modely ter\u00E9nu, 3D vizualizace jsou p\u0159\u00EDklady pojmenov\u00E1n\u00ED, kter\u00FDch se hojn\u011B pou\u017E\u00EDv\u00E1 v informatice, geografii, kartografii, a tak\u00E9 v geoinformatice. Je diskutov\u00E1na pouze problematika trojrozm\u011Brn\u00E9ho geometrick\u00E9ho prostoru, tedy bez uva\u017Eov\u00E1n\u00ED \u010Dasu a dal\u0161\u00EDch dimenz\u00ED. Auto\u0159i cht\u011Bj\u00ED upozornit na myln\u00E9 a mnohdy nesmysln\u00E9 pou\u017E\u00EDv\u00E1n\u00ED term\u00EDn\u016F t\u00FDkaj\u00EDc\u00EDch se vyj\u00E1d\u0159en\u00ED prostoru. P\u016Fvodn\u00ED a spr\u00E1vn\u011B my\u0161len\u00E9 n\u00E1zvy vznikl\u00E9 v oboru informatiky p\u0159i zpracov\u00E1n\u00ED prostorov\u00FDch dat byly p\u0159eneseny i do oblasti vizualizace, ve kter\u00E9 jsou v mnoha p\u0159\u00EDpadech neopodstatn\u011Bn\u00E9 a nespr\u00E1vn\u00E9. P\u0159\u00EDkladem, \u010Dasto u\u017E\u00EDvan\u00FDm i v odborn\u00E9 literatu\u0159e, m\u016F\u017Ee b\u00FDt ozna\u010Dov\u00E1n\u00ED perspektivn\u00EDho pr\u016Fm\u011Btu jako 3D zobrazen\u00ED apod. D\u00E1le p\u0159\u00EDsp\u011Bvek upozor\u0148uje na kolizi v pou\u017E\u00EDv\u00E1n\u00ED t\u011Bchto term\u00EDn\u016F. P\u0159esto, \u017Ee jsou pojmy ji\u017E za\u017Eit\u00E9, auto\u0159i doporu\u010Duj\u00ED zm\u011Bnu, zejm\u00E9na vzhledem k dal\u0161\u00EDmu technologick\u00E9mu v\u00FDvoji v oblasti vizualizace prostorov\u00FDch dat."@cs . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . . . . "RIV/61988987:17310/09:A1200VTM" . "Vizualizace prostorov\u00FDch dat: chaos v dimenz\u00EDch"@cs . . "349033" . "Vizualizace prostorov\u00FDch dat: chaos v dimenz\u00EDch" . "17310" . . . . . . . "[107EE2035BA4]" . . "Vizualizace prostorov\u00FDch dat: chaos v dimenz\u00EDch"@cs . . "Geografie Sborn\u00EDk \u010Cesk\u00E9 geografick\u00E9 spole\u010Dnosti" . "114" . "RIV/61988987:17310/09:A1200VTM!RIV12-MSM-17310___" . "Mi\u0159ijovsk\u00FD, Jakub" . "2D maps, 2,5D terrain models and 3D visualization are examples of terms which are widely used in computer science, geography, cartography, and also in geoinformatics. Only the issue of three-dimensional space is discussed, without incorporating time and other dimensions. The authors want to draw attention to the often misguiding and pointless use of the terms relating to the expression of space. The original and correct terms, originating in informatics and spatial data processing, have been transferred to the field of visualization, in which they are often unfounded and incorrect. An example of this, commonly used in the literature, can be referring to a perspective projection as a 3D view, etc. Furthermore, the paper points to collisions in the use of these terms. Despite the fact that the terms are already commonly used in the literature, the authors recommend a change of the terms, especially in view of further technological developments in the field of spatial data visualization."@en . "3" . . "1"^^ . "2"^^ . "000270831300002" . "Visualization of geospatial data: chaos in the dimensions"@en . "10"^^ . . .