. "\u010Cl\u00E1nek p\u0159ipom\u00EDn\u00E1 definitivn\u00ED ukon\u010Den\u00ED vyd\u00E1v\u00E1n\u00ED ti\u0161t\u011Bn\u00FDch Chemical Abstracts, tohoto nezastupiteln\u00E9ho zdroje chemick\u00FDch informac\u00ED v nej\u0161ir\u0161\u00EDm slova smyslu po 130 letech. Nejedn\u00E1 se o ukon\u010Den\u00ED t\u00E9to \u010Dinnost\u00ED, ale jen o jej\u00ED ti\u0161t\u011Bnou verzi. P\u0159\u00EDstup k nashrom\u00E1\u017Ed\u011Bn\u00FDm i star\u0161\u00EDch informac\u00ED z\u016Fst\u00E1v\u00E1 pochopiteln\u011B zachov\u00E1n v elektronick\u00FDch form\u00E1ch. Ale i po ukon\u010Den\u00ED p\u0159edstavuje ti\u0161t\u011Bn\u00E1 verze sumarizace chemick\u00FDch znalost\u00ED prakticky za cel\u00E9 20. stolet\u00ED. Ukon\u010Den\u00ED existence b\u00E1z\u00ED dat Beilstein a Gmelin m\u00E1 jin\u00E9 d\u016Fvody, v z\u00E1sad\u011B se jedn\u00E1 o v\u00FDsledek p\u0159eveden\u00ED produkce t\u011Bchto zdroj\u016F na nakladatelstv\u00ED Elsevier. Ov\u0161em pojmy Beilstein a Gmelin maj\u00ED evidentn\u011B st\u00E1le ur\u010Ditou ?zna\u010Dku? a tud\u00ED\u017E nezanedbatelnou hodnotu a proto z\u016Fst\u00E1vaj\u00ED jako ?Trade Marks? p\u016Fvodn\u00EDm instituc\u00EDm a vydavatelstv\u00ED Elsevier je nesm\u00ED pou\u017E\u00EDvat. Tak\u017Ee oba zdroje sice pokra\u010Duj\u00ED jako hlavn\u00ED sou\u010D\u00E1st syst\u00E9mu Reaxys, ale pojmy Beilstein a Gmelin z\u016Fst\u00E1vaj\u00ED neodmyslitelnou sou\u010D\u00E1st\u00ED chemick\u00E9 historie."@cs . . . . . . . "104" . "\u0160ilh\u00E1nek, Jaroslav" . "onec dvou chemick\u00FDch legend ? ti\u0161t\u011Bn\u00FDch Chemical Abstracts a b\u00E1z\u00ED dat Beilstein a Gmelin" . . . . "Z(MSM6046137301)" . . "Chemical information; databases; Beilstein; Gmelin; electronic sources; chemical history"@en . . "Chemick\u00E9 listy" . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . . . "onec dvou chemick\u00FDch legend ? ti\u0161t\u011Bn\u00FDch Chemical Abstracts a b\u00E1z\u00ED dat Beilstein a Gmelin"@cs . "22310" . . "The End of Two Chemical Legends ? Printed Chemical Abstracts and Beilstein and Gmelin Databases"@en . "The End of Two Chemical Legends ? Printed Chemical Abstracts and Beilstein and Gmelin Databases"@en . "1"^^ . "0009-2770" . . "3"^^ . "276972" . "1"^^ . "\u010Cl\u00E1nek p\u0159ipom\u00EDn\u00E1 definitivn\u00ED ukon\u010Den\u00ED vyd\u00E1v\u00E1n\u00ED ti\u0161t\u011Bn\u00FDch Chemical Abstracts, tohoto nezastupiteln\u00E9ho zdroje chemick\u00FDch informac\u00ED v nej\u0161ir\u0161\u00EDm slova smyslu po 130 letech. Nejedn\u00E1 se o ukon\u010Den\u00ED t\u00E9to \u010Dinnost\u00ED, ale jen o jej\u00ED ti\u0161t\u011Bnou verzi. P\u0159\u00EDstup k nashrom\u00E1\u017Ed\u011Bn\u00FDm i star\u0161\u00EDch informac\u00ED z\u016Fst\u00E1v\u00E1 pochopiteln\u011B zachov\u00E1n v elektronick\u00FDch form\u00E1ch. Ale i po ukon\u010Den\u00ED p\u0159edstavuje ti\u0161t\u011Bn\u00E1 verze sumarizace chemick\u00FDch znalost\u00ED prakticky za cel\u00E9 20. stolet\u00ED. Ukon\u010Den\u00ED existence b\u00E1z\u00ED dat Beilstein a Gmelin m\u00E1 jin\u00E9 d\u016Fvody, v z\u00E1sad\u011B se jedn\u00E1 o v\u00FDsledek p\u0159eveden\u00ED produkce t\u011Bchto zdroj\u016F na nakladatelstv\u00ED Elsevier. Ov\u0161em pojmy Beilstein a Gmelin maj\u00ED evidentn\u011B st\u00E1le ur\u010Ditou ?zna\u010Dku? a tud\u00ED\u017E nezanedbatelnou hodnotu a proto z\u016Fst\u00E1vaj\u00ED jako ?Trade Marks? p\u016Fvodn\u00EDm instituc\u00EDm a vydavatelstv\u00ED Elsevier je nesm\u00ED pou\u017E\u00EDvat. Tak\u017Ee oba zdroje sice pokra\u010Duj\u00ED jako hlavn\u00ED sou\u010D\u00E1st syst\u00E9mu Reaxys, ale pojmy Beilstein a Gmelin z\u016Fst\u00E1vaj\u00ED neodmyslitelnou sou\u010D\u00E1st\u00ED chemick\u00E9 historie." . "Article comments definite end of printed Chemical Abstracts after 103 years of existence as indispensable information source for all chemistry branches. Of course, it does not mean end of this service as such, it continues in electronic forms e.g. CAonCD or SciFinder, but only the end of its printed version. In any case, the total amount of 28 millions abstracts summarizing chemical knowledge harvested during whole 20th century is worth of mentioning anyway. The case of Beistein and Gmelin is different in respect that it is result of changing ownership and to some extend of keeping valuable ?trade marks? and not allowing to new owner to use it. But history of these two names is even greater and it is an example as the names of two chemists became the names of two multivolume sets of ?Handbucher? known to many generation of practicing chemists. Also in this case both sources continue but under the name of Reaxys database and officially terms Beilstein and Gmelin are part of chemical history."@en . "2010" . . "RIV/60461373:22310/10:00023145!RIV11-MSM-22310___" . "onec dvou chemick\u00FDch legend ? ti\u0161t\u011Bn\u00FDch Chemical Abstracts a b\u00E1z\u00ED dat Beilstein a Gmelin"@cs . . "onec dvou chemick\u00FDch legend ? ti\u0161t\u011Bn\u00FDch Chemical Abstracts a b\u00E1z\u00ED dat Beilstein a Gmelin" . "RIV/60461373:22310/10:00023145" . "[82B5854D1ED6]" .