"Bo\u0161e\u013Ea, Michal" . "22268" . . "0323-1046" . "Inter- and intra-annual dynamics of height increment in young beech and spruce stands in relation to tree size and weather conditions" . "5"^^ . "SK - Slovensk\u00E1 republika" . "Hl\u00E1sny, Tom\u00E1\u0161" . "9"^^ . "Fagus sylvatica, Picea abies, terminal growth seasonality, global radiation, precipitation"@en . . . "Pajt\u00EDk, Jozef" . "41320" . "0" . . "Inter- and intra-annual dynamics of height increment in young beech and spruce stands in relation to tree size and weather conditions"@en . "4"^^ . . "P(QJ1220316)" . . . "Konopka, Bohdan" . . "[B6599D3D3E77]" . "We investigated the seasonal dynamics of height increment, as well as total annual height increment, in 2009\u20132013 on young stands of beech and spruce grown at the same site. The results showed that the inter-annual dynamics of basic stand characteristics, especially tree density, were more obvious in spruce than in beech stands. Much higher tree mortality in spruce was explained by a lower light intensity under the spruce stand canopy and higher tolerance of beech to shade. Large interspecific differences were also found in the timing of height increment. Specifically, the height increment of beech trees started earlier than those of spruce. Moreover, the terminal grew for longer in spruce (nearly 70 days) compared to beech (about 45 days). The comparisons between the courses of the height increment and the ambient factors suggested that global radiation played a principal role. In the beech stand, the maximum height increment rate occurred during the same days as the maximal global radiation in 200"@en . . "We investigated the seasonal dynamics of height increment, as well as total annual height increment, in 2009\u20132013 on young stands of beech and spruce grown at the same site. The results showed that the inter-annual dynamics of basic stand characteristics, especially tree density, were more obvious in spruce than in beech stands. Much higher tree mortality in spruce was explained by a lower light intensity under the spruce stand canopy and higher tolerance of beech to shade. Large interspecific differences were also found in the timing of height increment. Specifically, the height increment of beech trees started earlier than those of spruce. Moreover, the terminal grew for longer in spruce (nearly 70 days) compared to beech (about 45 days). The comparisons between the courses of the height increment and the ambient factors suggested that global radiation played a principal role. In the beech stand, the maximum height increment rate occurred during the same days as the maximal global radiation in 200" . . . . . "RIV/60460709:41320/14:65563" . . . . "Sitkov\u00E1, Zuzana" . "60" . . "1" . . "Inter- and intra-annual dynamics of height increment in young beech and spruce stands in relation to tree size and weather conditions" . . "RIV/60460709:41320/14:65563!RIV15-MZE-41320___" . "Inter- and intra-annual dynamics of height increment in young beech and spruce stands in relation to tree size and weather conditions"@en . "Lesnicky \u010Dasopis (Forestry Journal)" . .