. . "This paper is focused on the suitability estimation of theoretical methods of wooden scarf joint bonded with PU adhesive loading capacity determination. Loading capacity of selected joint was experimentally determined for several wooden materials and bevel angles from 0\u00B0 to 90\u00B0. Theoretical dependencies by using two different methods for selected joints were calculated from values for 0\u00B0 and 90\u00B0 and results compared. First method was based on tangential on normal stress dependency substitution by ellipse. Second one was based on joint surface virtual division into 2 sections. Normal shear stress were respectively applied on the first and the second section. Results of the experiment showed that selected methods can be used for joints from 0\u00B0 to approx. 70\u00B0 of bevel angle with acceptable accuracy."@en . "S" . "RIV/60460709:41310/11:54037" . "Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica" . . "Mathematical models for determination of loading capacity \u2013 case study on wooden scarf bonded joint with PU adhesive" . . "RIV/60460709:41310/11:54037!RIV12-MSM-41310___" . "0" . "Mathematical models for determination of loading capacity \u2013 case study on wooden scarf bonded joint with PU adhesive"@en . . "Dajbych, Old\u0159ich" . . "Mathematical models for determination of loading capacity \u2013 case study on wooden scarf bonded joint with PU adhesive"@en . "42" . "wood, scarf joint, bonding, gluing, loading capacity, PU adhesive"@en . . "1211-3174" . "[D682B5A94523]" . . . "Her\u00E1k, David" . "6"^^ . . . "4" . . . . "Sedl\u00E1\u010Dek, Ale\u0161" . . "3"^^ . . "Mathematical models for determination of loading capacity \u2013 case study on wooden scarf bonded joint with PU adhesive" . "41310" . "3"^^ . "This paper is focused on the suitability estimation of theoretical methods of wooden scarf joint bonded with PU adhesive loading capacity determination. Loading capacity of selected joint was experimentally determined for several wooden materials and bevel angles from 0\u00B0 to 90\u00B0. Theoretical dependencies by using two different methods for selected joints were calculated from values for 0\u00B0 and 90\u00B0 and results compared. First method was based on tangential on normal stress dependency substitution by ellipse. Second one was based on joint surface virtual division into 2 sections. Normal shear stress were respectively applied on the first and the second section. Results of the experiment showed that selected methods can be used for joints from 0\u00B0 to approx. 70\u00B0 of bevel angle with acceptable accuracy." . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . "210922" . . . . .