"C\u00EDlem t\u00E9to pr\u00E1ce bylo na jednom stanovi\u0161ti porovnat v\u00FDnosy cel\u00E9ho sortimentu \u010Desk\u00FDch odr\u016Fd vojt\u011B\u0161ky set\u00E9. Poln\u00ED parcelkov\u00FD pokus byl zalo\u017Een v roce 2006 a hodnoceny byly roky 2007 \u2013 2009. Za\u0159azeno zde bylo 13 \u010Desk\u00FDch odr\u016Fd vojt\u011B\u0161ky, francouzsk\u00E1 odr\u016Fda Europe a novo\u0161lecht\u011Bn\u00ED \u017DE XLII. Re\u017Eim vyu\u017E\u00EDv\u00E1n\u00ED porostu byl t\u0159\u00EDse\u010Dn\u00FD a \u010Dty\u0159se\u010Dn\u00FD. V\u0161echny hodnocen\u00E9 odr\u016Fdy dos\u00E1hly vysok\u00FDch v\u00FDnos\u016F a nebyly mezi nimi, ani ve vztahu k po\u010Dtu se\u010D\u00ED, zji\u0161t\u011Bny statisticky v\u00FDznamn\u00E9 rozd\u00EDly. V\u00FDsledky v\u0161ak nazna\u010Duj\u00ED trend, \u017Ee na\u0161e nejstar\u0161\u00ED \u010Desk\u00E1 odr\u016Fda P\u00E1lava je ji\u017E p\u0159ekon\u00E1v\u00E1na nov\u00FDmi odr\u016Fdami. P\u0159\u00EDpadn\u00E9 rozd\u00EDly mezi odr\u016Fdami se projevily zejm\u00E9na ve druh\u00E9 a t\u0159et\u00ED se\u010Di. \u010Cty\u0159se\u010Dn\u00FD re\u017Eim poskytl pr\u016Fkazn\u011B ni\u017E\u0161\u00ED v\u00FDnosy ne\u017E t\u0159\u00EDse\u010Dn\u00FD, toto sn\u00ED\u017Een\u00ED v\u0161ak p\u0159edstavovalo pouze 4 \u2013 5%."@cs . . . "C\u00EDlem t\u00E9to pr\u00E1ce bylo na jednom stanovi\u0161ti porovnat v\u00FDnosy cel\u00E9ho sortimentu \u010Desk\u00FDch odr\u016Fd vojt\u011B\u0161ky set\u00E9. Poln\u00ED parcelkov\u00FD pokus byl zalo\u017Een v roce 2006 a hodnoceny byly roky 2007 \u2013 2009. Za\u0159azeno zde bylo 13 \u010Desk\u00FDch odr\u016Fd vojt\u011B\u0161ky, francouzsk\u00E1 odr\u016Fda Europe a novo\u0161lecht\u011Bn\u00ED \u017DE XLII. Re\u017Eim vyu\u017E\u00EDv\u00E1n\u00ED porostu byl t\u0159\u00EDse\u010Dn\u00FD a \u010Dty\u0159se\u010Dn\u00FD. V\u0161echny hodnocen\u00E9 odr\u016Fdy dos\u00E1hly vysok\u00FDch v\u00FDnos\u016F a nebyly mezi nimi, ani ve vztahu k po\u010Dtu se\u010D\u00ED, zji\u0161t\u011Bny statisticky v\u00FDznamn\u00E9 rozd\u00EDly. V\u00FDsledky v\u0161ak nazna\u010Duj\u00ED trend, \u017Ee na\u0161e nejstar\u0161\u00ED \u010Desk\u00E1 odr\u016Fda P\u00E1lava je ji\u017E p\u0159ekon\u00E1v\u00E1na nov\u00FDmi odr\u016Fdami. P\u0159\u00EDpadn\u00E9 rozd\u00EDly mezi odr\u016Fdami se projevily zejm\u00E9na ve druh\u00E9 a t\u0159et\u00ED se\u010Di. \u010Cty\u0159se\u010Dn\u00FD re\u017Eim poskytl pr\u016Fkazn\u011B ni\u017E\u0161\u00ED v\u00FDnosy ne\u017E t\u0159\u00EDse\u010Dn\u00FD, toto sn\u00ED\u017Een\u00ED v\u0161ak p\u0159edstavovalo pouze 4 \u2013 5%." . "0139-6013" . "RIV/60460709:41210/11:52882!RIV12-MSM-41210___" . "Z(MSM6046070901)" . . "59" . . . "Porovn\u00E1n\u00ED v\u00FDnos\u016F p\u00EDce v sortimentu \u010Desk\u00FDch odr\u016Fd vojt\u011B\u0161ky set\u00E9"@cs . . "0" . "[F7EA745C9CDD]" . . "Porovn\u00E1n\u00ED v\u00FDnos\u016F p\u00EDce v sortimentu \u010Desk\u00FDch odr\u016Fd vojt\u011B\u0161ky set\u00E9" . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . "Hakl, Josef" . . "3"^^ . . "M\u00E1\u0161kov\u00E1, Kamila" . "3"^^ . "The comparison of forage yield among Czech lucerne varieties"@en . "Porovn\u00E1n\u00ED v\u00FDnos\u016F p\u00EDce v sortimentu \u010Desk\u00FDch odr\u016Fd vojt\u011B\u0161ky set\u00E9"@cs . . . "221530" . . . . "Porovn\u00E1n\u00ED v\u00FDnos\u016F p\u00EDce v sortimentu \u010Desk\u00FDch odr\u016Fd vojt\u011B\u0161ky set\u00E9" . "\u00DAroda" . . "forage, year, number of cuts, stand density"@en . . "4" . . "\u0160antr\u016F\u010Dek, Jarom\u00EDr" . "The aim of this study was to compare dry matter yield among all Czech lucerne varieties. The field plot experiment was established in 2006 and three following years were evaluated. Thirteen Czech varieties, French variety Europe and candivar \u017DE XLII were included in this experiment. The harvest schedule presented three and four cut per year. All evaluated entries achieved high dry matter yield without significant differences. In spite of it, the result suggested that the oldest variety P\u00E1lava provided the lowest yield in comparison with new lucerne varieties. The differences among varieties were recorded mainly it the second and third cut. The four-cut regime obtained significantly lower yield than three-cut but this reduction represented only 4 \u2013 5%."@en . . . "RIV/60460709:41210/11:52882" . "4"^^ . "The comparison of forage yield among Czech lucerne varieties"@en . "41210" .