"CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . . "Pojem \u201Espravedliv\u00E1 cena\u201C ve st\u0159edov\u011Bk\u00E9 kanonick\u00E9 nauce" . "1" . "RIV/60460709:41110/09:31341!RIV10-MSM-41110___" . "1"^^ . . "The Term \u201EFair Price\u201C in the Teaching of Medieval Canon Law"@en . "RIV/60460709:41110/09:31341" . . "333986" . . "Pojem \u201Espravedliv\u00E1 cena\u201C ve st\u0159edov\u011Bk\u00E9 kanonick\u00E9 nauce" . . "The Term \u201EFair Price\u201C in the Teaching of Medieval Canon Law"@en . . . "fair price, medieval, church, canonists, law"@en . . . "S" . . . . . "Revue c\u00EDrkevn\u00EDho pr\u00E1va" . "11"^^ . "Kdy\u017E Gratian shroma\u017E\u010Foval odporuj\u00EDc\u00ED si p\u0159edpisy ran\u00E9ho c\u00EDrkevn\u00EDho koncilu spole\u010Dn\u011B s n\u011Bkolika teoriemi vlastnictv\u00ED obhajovan\u00FDmi c\u00EDrkevn\u00EDmi otci, byl postaven p\u0159ed ot\u00E1zku v\u00FDb\u011Bru t\u011Bchto dokument\u016F, kter\u00E9 p\u0159e\u017Eily ranou dobu st\u0159edov\u011Bku a m\u011Bly b\u00FDt obnoveny a ustanoveny jako platn\u00FD z\u00E1kon. Tehdy poznal, \u017Ee c\u00EDrkevn\u00ED jurisprudence se radik\u00E1ln\u011B li\u0161\u00ED od evangelick\u00E9ho u\u010Den\u00ED a reformuje tak laick\u00E9 obyvatelstvo. Jeho Decretum n\u00E1m poskytlo obecn\u00E9 p\u0159edpoklady zahrnuj\u00EDc\u00ED prodej, kontrolu a soci\u00E1ln\u00ED povinnosti vlastnictv\u00ED ve dvan\u00E1ct\u00E9m stolet\u00ED. \u00DAvodn\u00ED str\u00E1nky podn\u00EDtily probl\u00E9m s p\u0159irozen\u00FDm pr\u00E1vem v souvislosti se soukrom\u00FDm vlastnictv\u00EDm a byla to gratianova neur\u010Dit\u00E1 prezentace p\u0159irozen\u00E9ho pr\u00E1va, kter\u00E1 zp\u016Fsobila probl\u00E9my budouc\u00EDm kanonist\u016Fm, jejich\u017E \u00FAkol byl objasnit tento zmatek v knize c\u00EDrkevn\u00EDch z\u00E1kon\u016F. Kanonist\u00E9 obecn\u011B p\u0159ijali tehdej\u0161\u00ED k\u00E1nony vlastnick\u00FDch vztah\u016F jako nutn\u00E1 a spravedliv\u00E1, jako syst\u00E9m, v kter\u00E9m individu\u00E1ln\u00ED vlastnick\u00E1 pr\u00E1va byla uzn\u00E1na a doprov\u00E1zena odpov\u00EDdaj\u00EDc\u00EDmi povinnostmi. Nikoliv pouze k\u0159es\u0165an\u00E9 al" . . . "41110" . "Pojem \u201Espravedliv\u00E1 cena\u201C ve st\u0159edov\u011Bk\u00E9 kanonick\u00E9 nauce"@cs . "1211-1635" . "Kdy\u017E Gratian shroma\u017E\u010Foval odporuj\u00EDc\u00ED si p\u0159edpisy ran\u00E9ho c\u00EDrkevn\u00EDho koncilu spole\u010Dn\u011B s n\u011Bkolika teoriemi vlastnictv\u00ED obhajovan\u00FDmi c\u00EDrkevn\u00EDmi otci, byl postaven p\u0159ed ot\u00E1zku v\u00FDb\u011Bru t\u011Bchto dokument\u016F, kter\u00E9 p\u0159e\u017Eily ranou dobu st\u0159edov\u011Bku a m\u011Bly b\u00FDt obnoveny a ustanoveny jako platn\u00FD z\u00E1kon. Tehdy poznal, \u017Ee c\u00EDrkevn\u00ED jurisprudence se radik\u00E1ln\u011B li\u0161\u00ED od evangelick\u00E9ho u\u010Den\u00ED a reformuje tak laick\u00E9 obyvatelstvo. Jeho Decretum n\u00E1m poskytlo obecn\u00E9 p\u0159edpoklady zahrnuj\u00EDc\u00ED prodej, kontrolu a soci\u00E1ln\u00ED povinnosti vlastnictv\u00ED ve dvan\u00E1ct\u00E9m stolet\u00ED. \u00DAvodn\u00ED str\u00E1nky podn\u00EDtily probl\u00E9m s p\u0159irozen\u00FDm pr\u00E1vem v souvislosti se soukrom\u00FDm vlastnictv\u00EDm a byla to gratianova neur\u010Dit\u00E1 prezentace p\u0159irozen\u00E9ho pr\u00E1va, kter\u00E1 zp\u016Fsobila probl\u00E9my budouc\u00EDm kanonist\u016Fm, jejich\u017E \u00FAkol byl objasnit tento zmatek v knize c\u00EDrkevn\u00EDch z\u00E1kon\u016F. Kanonist\u00E9 obecn\u011B p\u0159ijali tehdej\u0161\u00ED k\u00E1nony vlastnick\u00FDch vztah\u016F jako nutn\u00E1 a spravedliv\u00E1, jako syst\u00E9m, v kter\u00E9m individu\u00E1ln\u00ED vlastnick\u00E1 pr\u00E1va byla uzn\u00E1na a doprov\u00E1zena odpov\u00EDdaj\u00EDc\u00EDmi povinnostmi. Nikoliv pouze k\u0159es\u0165an\u00E9 al"@cs . "42" . "When Gratian came to collect the discordant canons of early church councils along with the several theories of property espoused by church fathers, he was faced with selecting those documents that had survived the Dark Ages and were to be revived and regarded as living law. He saw the juridical church as distinct from the evangelical experience so important to the radical, reforming laity of the time. His Decretum provides us with the prevailing assumptions concerning the proper distribution, control and social obligations of property in the twelfth century. The opening pages raise the problem of the natural law in relation to private property and it was his ambiguous presentation of the natural law that provided problems for future canonists whose task it was to unravel the tangle in this textbook of church law. Canonists generally accepted the contemporary structures of property relationships as both necessary and just, a system in which individual property rights were acknowledged and attended by"@en . "Pojem \u201Espravedliv\u00E1 cena\u201C ve st\u0159edov\u011Bk\u00E9 kanonick\u00E9 nauce"@cs . . "\u0160r\u00E9dl, Karel" . "1"^^ . "[FFAA2956DCE2]" .