"3"^^ . . . . "Vliv biologick\u00FDch aditiv pro sil\u00E1\u017Eov\u00E1n\u00ED na fermenta\u010Dn\u00ED charakteristiky." . "Vliv biologick\u00FDch aditiv pro sil\u00E1\u017Eov\u00E1n\u00ED na fermenta\u010Dn\u00ED charakteristiky."@cs . . "\u010Cesk\u00E9 Bud\u011Bjovice" . "\u010Cesk\u00E9 Bud\u011Bjovice" . "Vliv biologick\u00FDch aditiv pro sil\u00E1\u017Eov\u00E1n\u00ED na fermenta\u010Dn\u00ED charakteristiky."@cs . . "0"^^ . "4"^^ . "0"^^ . . "2002-09-04+02:00"^^ . "L\u00E1d, Franti\u0161ek" . "Effect of biological additives for ensiling and fermentation parameters"@en . "Z(MSM 122200002)" . "RIV/60076658:_____/02:00004184!RIV/2003/MSM/120003/N" . . "We have tested additive effect for fermentation characteristics and fermentation processes in enterprise conditions in Agricultural Co-operative Brloh. We have evaluated quality of maize ensilages according to firm proposal AgroKonzulta \u017Damberk. We haveevaluated fermentation processes. The ensilage without additive was categorized to third fermentation class. The maize ensilages with polybacterial additive (A) and polybacterial-ferment additive (B) were categorized to first fermentation class. Our tes ted additives have positive effect for fermentation processes. The maize ensilage with polybacterial additive was evaluated by 90 points, the maize ensilage with polybacterial-ferment additive - 86 points and the maize ensilage without additive - 80,5 points. The result maize evaluation is sum of fermentation processes evaluation and evaluation of nutritive value. The maize ensilage with additives have higher quality."@en . "RIV/60076658:_____/02:00004184" . "Kadlec, Jarom\u00EDr" . "80-7040-559-7" . "Vliv biologick\u00FDch aditiv pro sil\u00E1\u017Eov\u00E1n\u00ED na fermenta\u010Dn\u00ED charakteristiky." . . "Jiho\u010Desk\u00E1 univerzita v \u010Cesk\u00FDch Bud\u011Bjovic\u00EDch. Biologick\u00E1 fakulta" . "Sborn\u00EDk p\u0159\u00EDsp\u011Bvk\u016F ze IV. ro\u010Dn\u00EDku mezin\u00E1rodn\u00ED v\u011Bdeck\u00E9 konference ve spolupr\u00E1ci s MZe \u010CR a IVV MZe Praha Agroregion 2002" . . "3"^^ . "\u010Cerm\u00E1k, Bohuslav" . "Testovali jsme \u00FA\u010Dinek aditiv na fermenta\u010Dn\u00ED charakteristiky a vlastn\u00ED proces fermentace v provozn\u00EDch podm\u00EDnk\u00E1ch zem\u011Bd\u011Blsk\u00E9ho dru\u017Estava Brloh. Sil\u00E1\u017Ee bez p\u0159\u00EDdavku aditiv byly za\u0159azeny do t\u0159et\u00ED fermenta\u010Dn\u00ED t\u0159\u00EDdy. Kuku\u0159i\u010Dn\u00E9 sil\u00E1\u017Ee s polybakteri\u00E1ln\u00EDm aditivem (A) a s polybakteri\u00E1ln\u011B-enzymatick\u00FDm p\u0159\u00EDpravkem byly za\u0159azeny do prvn\u00ED t\u0159\u00EDdy. Testovan\u00E1 aditiva m\u011Bla pozitivn\u00ED vliv na fermenta\u010Dn\u00ED proces. Kuku\u0159i\u010Dn\u00E1 sil\u00E1\u017E s polybakteri\u00E1ln\u00EDm p\u0159\u00EDpravkem byla hodnocena 90-ti body, sil\u00E1\u017E s polybakteri\u00E1ln\u011B-enzymatick\u00FDm p\u0159\u00EDpravkem 86-ti body a sil\u00E1\u017E bez aditiv 80,5-ti body. V\u00FDsledn\u00E9 hodnocen\u00ED sil\u00E1\u017Ee je sumou hodnocen\u00ED fermenta\u010Dn\u00EDho procesu a nutri\u010Dn\u00ED hodnoty. Sil\u00E1\u017Ee s p\u0159\u00EDdavkem hodnocen\u00FDch aditiv byly kvalitn\u011Bj\u0161\u00ED." . . "97-99" . . . "ensilage; quality of ensilage; fermentation proces"@en . "[1F867B8C5AC6]" . . . "668829" . "Effect of biological additives for ensiling and fermentation parameters"@en . . . . . "Jan\u010D\u00EDk, F." .