"Pechar, Libor" . "M\u00E1s\u00EDlko, Jan" . . . "[D6E00379C34D]" . "12520" . "186532" . . "Ichtyofauna horn\u00EDho toku Stropnice pod Novohradsk\u00FDmi horami je v\u00FDrazn\u011B ovlivn\u011Bna antropogenn\u00ED \u010Dinnost\u00ED. Na 45,2 \u0159. km je vybudov\u00E1na \u00FAdoln\u00ED p\u0159ehrada Humenice, kter\u00E1 naru\u0161ila p\u016Fvodn\u00ED hydrologick\u00FD syst\u00E9m tohoto toku. Do sledovan\u00E9 \u010D\u00E1sti (32-43 \u0159. km) toku je p\u0159i v\u00FDlovech vypou\u0161t\u011Bno celkem 59 rybn\u00EDk\u016F. V \u0159\u00ED\u010Dn\u00EDm koryt\u011B byly postupn\u011B provedeny r\u016Fzn\u00E9 technick\u00E9 \u00FApravy. P\u0159i ichtyologick\u00E9m monitoringu t\u0159\u00ED \u00FAsek\u016F (\u0159. km 32,7-36,4-41,2) v horn\u00ED polovin\u011B toku Stropnice v letech 1998, 2000 a 2003 byl zji\u0161t\u011Bn v\u00FDskyt 15 druh\u016F ryb. Z p\u016Fvodn\u00EDch \u0159\u00ED\u010Dn\u00EDch druh\u016F se vyskytovaly pouze G. gobio a ojedin\u011Ble S. trutta m. fario. Ostatn\u00ED druhy emigruj\u00ED do toku z napojen\u00FDch n\u00E1dr\u017E\u00ED a rybn\u00EDk\u016F. Z nich se nej\u010Dast\u011Bji vyskytovaly P. parva, R. rutilus, T. tinca, S. erythropthalmus, P. fluviatilis a A. anguilla. Abundance a biomasa ryb se ve sledovan\u00FDch lokalit\u00E1ch pohybovala v rozp\u011Bt\u00ED od 500 do 16 650 ks.ha-1, resp. 10,6-134.5 kg.ha-1. Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ED hodnoty v jednotliv\u00FDch letech byly zji\u0161t\u011Bny na lokalit\u011B B (\u0159. km 36,4), kde byla provedena pouze m\u00EDstn\u00ED \u00FAdr\u017Eba koryta. Naopak nejni\u017E\u0161\u00ED hodnoty abundance a biomasy byly zji\u0161t\u011Bny na technicky upraven\u00E9 lokalit\u011B A (\u0159. km 41,2) s polovegeta\u010Dn\u00EDmi tv\u00E1rnicemi opev\u0148uj\u00EDc\u00EDmi dno i b\u0159ehy. Katastrof\u00E1ln\u00ED povode\u0148 v srpnu 2002 sn\u00ED\u017Eila po\u010Detnost do t\u00E9 doby nejhojn\u011Bj\u0161\u00EDch druh\u016F P. parva a R. rutilus, zv\u00FD\u0161ila po\u010Detnost G. gobio a na lokalit\u011B B (\u0159. km 36,4) byl zji\u0161t\u011Bn v\u00FDskyt L. leuciscus a L. cephalus."@cs . . . "Rost, Michael" . "Ichtyofauna horn\u00EDho toku Stropnice pod Novohradsk\u00FDmi horami je v\u00FDrazn\u011B ovlivn\u011Bna antropogenn\u00ED \u010Dinnost\u00ED. Na 45,2 \u0159. km je vybudov\u00E1na \u00FAdoln\u00ED p\u0159ehrada Humenice, kter\u00E1 naru\u0161ila p\u016Fvodn\u00ED hydrologick\u00FD syst\u00E9m tohoto toku. Do sledovan\u00E9 \u010D\u00E1sti (32-43 \u0159. km) toku je p\u0159i v\u00FDlovech vypou\u0161t\u011Bno celkem 59 rybn\u00EDk\u016F. V \u0159\u00ED\u010Dn\u00EDm koryt\u011B byly postupn\u011B provedeny r\u016Fzn\u00E9 technick\u00E9 \u00FApravy. P\u0159i ichtyologick\u00E9m monitoringu t\u0159\u00ED \u00FAsek\u016F (\u0159. km 32,7-36,4-41,2) v horn\u00ED polovin\u011B toku Stropnice v letech 1998, 2000 a 2003 byl zji\u0161t\u011Bn v\u00FDskyt 15 druh\u016F ryb. Z p\u016Fvodn\u00EDch \u0159\u00ED\u010Dn\u00EDch druh\u016F se vyskytovaly pouze G. gobio a ojedin\u011Ble S. trutta m. fario. Ostatn\u00ED druhy emigruj\u00ED do toku z napojen\u00FDch n\u00E1dr\u017E\u00ED a rybn\u00EDk\u016F. Z nich se nej\u010Dast\u011Bji vyskytovaly P. parva, R. rutilus, T. tinca, S. erythropthalmus, P. fluviatilis a A. anguilla. Abundance a biomasa ryb se ve sledovan\u00FDch lokalit\u00E1ch pohybovala v rozp\u011Bt\u00ED od 500 do 16 650 ks.ha-1, resp. 10,6-134.5 kg.ha-1. Nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00ED hodnoty v jednotliv\u00FDch letech byly zji\u0161t\u011Bny na lokalit\u011B B (\u0159. km 36,4), kde byla provedena pouze m\u00EDstn\u00ED \u00FAdr\u017Eba koryta. Naopak nejni\u017E\u0161\u00ED hodnoty abundance a biomasy byly zji\u0161t\u011Bny na technicky upraven\u00E9 lokalit\u011B A (\u0159. km 41,2) s polovegeta\u010Dn\u00EDmi tv\u00E1rnicemi opev\u0148uj\u00EDc\u00EDmi dno i b\u0159ehy. Katastrof\u00E1ln\u00ED povode\u0148 v srpnu 2002 sn\u00ED\u017Eila po\u010Detnost do t\u00E9 doby nejhojn\u011Bj\u0161\u00EDch druh\u016F P. parva a R. rutilus, zv\u00FD\u0161ila po\u010Detnost G. gobio a na lokalit\u011B B (\u0159. km 36,4) byl zji\u0161t\u011Bn v\u00FDskyt L. leuciscus a L. cephalus." . "3"^^ . . . "Bulletin V\u00DARH Vod\u0148any" . . . "Antropogenn\u00ED a povod\u0148ov\u00E9 vlivy na ichtyofaunu horn\u00EDho toku Stropnice pod Novohradsk\u00FDmi horami" . . . . "0007-389X" . "Dvo\u0159\u00E1k, Petr" . . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . . "Hartvich, Petr" . "6"^^ . . "Antropogenn\u00ED a povod\u0148ov\u00E9 vlivy na ichtyofaunu horn\u00EDho toku Stropnice pod Novohradsk\u00FDmi horami" . . "Antropogenous and flood effects on the river Stropnice upper flow ichthyofauna under the Nov\u00E9 hrady mountains"@en . "Antropogenous and flood effects on the river Stropnice upper flow ichthyofauna under the Nov\u00E9 hrady mountains"@en . "P(ED2.1.00/01.0024), S, Z(MSM6007665806), Z(MSM6007665809)" . . "RIV/60076658:12520/11:43881799!RIV12-MSM-12520___" . . "47" . "Ichthyofauna of the upper flow of the Stropnice river under Nov\u00E9 Hrady Mountains is strongly influenced by anthropogenic activities. To the referenced section (32-43 km) of flow the outlet from 59 ponds is discharged during the harvest time. In the river bed, various technical adjustments have been gradually implemented. It was detected 15 fish species during ichthyological monitoring of three sections (32.7 - 36.4 - 41.2 km of flow) in the upper half of the Stropnice river flow during 1998, 2000 and 2003. From original fish river species only sporadically gudgeon, Gobio gobio (L.) and brown trout (Salmo trutta m. fario, L.) occurred. Other species emigrate to the flow from connected reservoirs and ponds. Of these, mostly topmouth gudgeon, Pseudorasbora parva (Temminck and Schlegel, 1846), roach, Rutilus rutilus (L.), tench, Tinca tinca (L.), rudd, Scardinius erythrophthalmus (L.), Eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis, L.) and European eel, Anguilla anguilla (L.) occurred. Abundance and biomass of fish in selected locations range from 500 to 16650 ind.ha-1, 10.6 to 134.5 kg.ha-1, respectively. The highest values, during particular folowing years, were found in lokality B (36.4 km of flow), where only local maintenance of river bed was applied. The disastrous flood in August 2002 decreased abundance of (in the meantime most abundant) topmouth gudgeon and rudd species. It also increased population of gudgeon and at site B (36 km of flow) where common dace, Leuciscus leuciscus (L.) and chub, Leuciscus cephalus (L.) were detected."@en . "Antropogenn\u00ED a povod\u0148ov\u00E9 vlivy na ichtyofaunu horn\u00EDho toku Stropnice pod Novohradsk\u00FDmi horami"@cs . "12"^^ . "Antropogenn\u00ED a povod\u0148ov\u00E9 vlivy na ichtyofaunu horn\u00EDho toku Stropnice pod Novohradsk\u00FDmi horami"@cs . . "RIV/60076658:12520/11:43881799" . "Holub, M." . . "migration; flood fish; ichthyological monitoring; biomass; Abundance"@en . . . "1" . . .