"368429" . . . . . . . "Four chapters about the monophyly of insect orders: A review of recent phylogenetic contributions" . "Four chapters about the monophyly of insect orders: A review of recent phylogenetic contributions"@en . . "\u010Cty\u0159i kapitoly o monofylii hmyz\u00EDch %22\u0159\u00E1d\u016F%22: p\u0159ehled sou\u010Dasn\u00FDch fylogenetick\u00FDch n\u00E1zor\u016F"@cs . "16"^^ . . . . . . "Sou\u010Dasn\u00E9 fylogenetick\u00E9 anal\u00FDzy, jak morfologick\u00E9, tak i molekul\u00E1rn\u00ED, jasn\u011B podporuj\u00ED monofylii v\u011Bt\u0161iny hmyz\u00EDch %22\u0159\u00E1d\u016F%22. V\u00FDjimky tvo\u0159\u00ED parafyletick\u00E9 skupiny Blattaria, Psocoptera a Mecoptera a pravd\u011Bpodobn\u011B difyletick\u00E1 skupina Phthiraptera. Byly identifikov\u00E1ny mal\u00E9 reliktn\u00ED skupiny, kter\u00E9 p\u0159edstavuj\u00ED sestersk\u00E9 skupiny tradi\u010Dn\u00EDch %22\u0159\u00E1d\u016F%22 (Cryptocercidae pro Isoptera, Liposcelididae pro Phthiraptera, Boreidae pro Siphonaptera). Systematick\u00E9 postaven\u00ED rodu Tricholepidion (Zygentoma?) z\u016Fst\u00E1v\u00E1 nejasn\u00E9."@cs . . "0374-1036" . "[49263B5000CB]" . "Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae" . . "RIV/60076658:12310/08:00009827!RIV09-MSM-12310___" . . "Zrzav\u00FD, Jan" . "RIV/60076658:12310/08:00009827" . "\u010Cty\u0159i kapitoly o monofylii hmyz\u00EDch %22\u0159\u00E1d\u016F%22: p\u0159ehled sou\u010Dasn\u00FDch fylogenetick\u00FDch n\u00E1zor\u016F"@cs . . "Recent phylogenetic analyses, both morphological and molecular, strongly support the monophyly of most insect ?orders?. On the contrary, the Blattaria, Psocoptera, and Mecoptera are defi nitely paraphyletic (with respect of the Isoptera, Phthiraptera, and Siphonaptera, respectively), and the Phthiraptera are possibly diphyletic. Small relictual subclades that are closely related to the Isoptera, Phthiraptera, and Siphonaptera were identifi ed (Cryptocercidae, Liposcelididae, and Boreidae, respectively), which provides an enormous amount of evidence about the origin and early evolution of the highly apomorphic eusocial or parasitic ex-groups. Position of the enigmatic ?zygentoman? Tricholepidion Wygodzinsky, 1961, remains uncertain. Possible non-monophyly of the Megaloptera (with respect of the Raphidioptera) and the Phasmatodea (with respect of the Embioptera) are shortly discussed." . "Four chapters about the monophyly of insect orders: A review of recent phylogenetic contributions"@en . "1"^^ . "Four chapters about the monophyly of insect orders: A review of recent phylogenetic contributions" . "12310" . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . "Insecta; Zygentoma; Tricholepidion; Blattaria; Isoptera; Cryptocercus; Psocoptera; Phthiraptera; Liposcelididae; Mecoptera; Siphonaptera; Boreidae; Nannochoristidae; Timema; phylogeny; monophyly"@en . . "2" . "S" . . . "48" . . . . . . . "Recent phylogenetic analyses, both morphological and molecular, strongly support the monophyly of most insect ?orders?. On the contrary, the Blattaria, Psocoptera, and Mecoptera are defi nitely paraphyletic (with respect of the Isoptera, Phthiraptera, and Siphonaptera, respectively), and the Phthiraptera are possibly diphyletic. Small relictual subclades that are closely related to the Isoptera, Phthiraptera, and Siphonaptera were identifi ed (Cryptocercidae, Liposcelididae, and Boreidae, respectively), which provides an enormous amount of evidence about the origin and early evolution of the highly apomorphic eusocial or parasitic ex-groups. Position of the enigmatic ?zygentoman? Tricholepidion Wygodzinsky, 1961, remains uncertain. Possible non-monophyly of the Megaloptera (with respect of the Raphidioptera) and the Phasmatodea (with respect of the Embioptera) are shortly discussed."@en . . "1"^^ . .