"consumerism; ecoethics; ethical anthropocentrism; Christian social ethics; social encyclicals; Catholic social teaching; globalization; ecology; sustainable development; development"@en . "2"^^ . . . "39369" . . "M\u00ED\u010Dka, Roman" . "4" . . . . "Princip trvale udr\u017Eiteln\u00E9ho rozvoje v soci\u00E1ln\u00EDm u\u010Den\u00ED c\u00EDrkve" . . "[36D256F58888]" . . . . . "The paper presents the context and development of the concept of sustainable development and asks to what extent it is applied and reflected in Catholic social teaching and the broader context of Christian ethics. It follows the development of the concept in the course of three UN conferences devoted to the environment (Stockholm, Rio de Janeiro, Johannesburg) as well as in the subsequent expert and ideological debate concerning the content and implications of the concept. It further examines the topic of development and sustainable development in the documents of the social teaching of the Catholic Church and in Christian social-ethical thought, its gradual reception and differences from its general use. In the process of intensification of ecological consciousness Catholic social teaching gradually received the concept of sustainable development in its basic meaning of intergenerational solidarity and respect to nature. However, it sets it in the broader concept of integral human development and underlines the anthropological dimension of ecological issues in the context of biblical and theological anthropology. Besides ecological and economic-developmental accents it fundamentally stresses the dimension of human dignity and life from natural beginning to natural end. Thus it does not identify with the more radical ecological conceptions, which are ecocentric or biocentric in character and are overly sceptical to the perspective of the dynamics of further development, or conversely to the need to limit consumerism. Its emphasis on culture of life will be in permanent opposition to new and powerful instruments of the %22culture of death%22, which often shroud in the agreeable garment of ecological emphases. With its accent on revising lifestyles and moderating consumption it can markedly contribute to cultivating sustainable integral development of humanity and the natural environment."@en . . "Caritas et Veritas" . "The Principle of Sustainable Development in Catholic Social Teaching"@en . "The Principle of Sustainable Development in Catholic Social Teaching"@en . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . "12260" . . . . . "S" . . . "1805-0948" . . "Princip trvale udr\u017Eiteln\u00E9ho rozvoje v soci\u00E1ln\u00EDm u\u010Den\u00ED c\u00EDrkve" . "\u010Cl\u00E1nek p\u0159edkl\u00E1d\u00E1 kontext a rozvoj pojmu trvale udr\u017Eiteln\u00E9ho rozvoje a klade si ot\u00E1zku, nakolik je uplatn\u011Bn a reflektov\u00E1n v soci\u00E1ln\u00EDm u\u010Den\u00ED c\u00EDrkve a v \u0161ir\u0161\u00EDm kontextu k\u0159es\u0165ansk\u00E9 etiky. Sleduje v\u00FDvoj pojmu v pr\u016Fb\u011Bhu t\u0159\u00ED konferenc\u00ED OSN v\u011Bnovan\u00FDch \u017Eivotn\u00EDmu prost\u0159ed\u00ED (Stockholm, Rio de Janeiro, Johannesburg) i v n\u00E1sledn\u00E9 odborn\u00E9 a ideologick\u00E9 debat\u011B ohledn\u011B obsahu a d\u016Fsledk\u016F dan\u00E9ho pojmu. D\u00E1le je zkoum\u00E1no t\u00E9ma rozvoje a udr\u017Eiteln\u00E9ho rozvoje v dokumentech soci\u00E1ln\u00EDho u\u010Den\u00ED katolick\u00E9 c\u00EDrkve i v k\u0159es\u0165ansk\u00E9m soci\u00E1ln\u011B-etick\u00E9m my\u0161len\u00ED, jeho postupn\u00E1 recepce i odli\u0161nosti v\u016F\u010Di jeho obecn\u00E9mu u\u017Eit\u00ED. V pr\u016Fb\u011Bhu intenzifikace ekologick\u00E9ho v\u011Bdom\u00ED v z\u00E1sad\u011B soci\u00E1ln\u00ED u\u010Den\u00ED c\u00EDrkve postupn\u011B p\u0159ijalo koncept trvale udr\u017Eiteln\u00E9ho rozvoje v jeho z\u00E1kladn\u00EDm v\u00FDznamu mezigenera\u010Dn\u00ED solidarity a ohled\u016F v\u016F\u010Di p\u0159\u00EDrod\u011B. Zasazuje jej v\u0161ak do \u0161ir\u0161\u00EDho konceptu integr\u00E1ln\u00EDho rozvoje \u010Dlov\u011Bka a lidstva a akcentuje antropologick\u00FD rozm\u011Br ekologick\u00E9 ot\u00E1zky v kontextu biblick\u00E9 a teologick\u00E9 antropologie. Krom\u011B ekologick\u00FDch a ekonomicko-rozvojov\u00FDch akcent\u016F zd\u016Fraz\u0148uje z\u00E1sadn\u011B i rozm\u011Br d\u016Fstojnosti \u010Dlov\u011Bka a jeho \u017Eivota od p\u0159irozen\u00E9ho po\u010D\u00E1tku do p\u0159irozen\u00E9ho konce. Neztoto\u017E\u0148uje se tak s radik\u00E1ln\u011Bj\u0161\u00EDmi ekologick\u00FDmi koncepcemi, kter\u00E9 maj\u00ED ekocentrick\u00FD \u010Di biocentrick\u00FD charakter a jsou p\u0159\u00EDli\u0161 skeptick\u00E9 v\u016F\u010Di perspektiv\u011B dynamiky dal\u0161\u00EDho rozvoje, nebo naopak v\u016F\u010Di pot\u0159eb\u011B omezen\u00ED konzumismu. D\u016Fraz soci\u00E1ln\u00EDho u\u010Den\u00ED c\u00EDrkve na kulturu \u017Eivota bude st\u00E1t v trval\u00E9 opozici v\u016F\u010Di nov\u00FDm a mocn\u00FDm n\u00E1stroj\u016Fm %22kultury smrti%22, kter\u00E9 se mnohdy zaobaluj\u00ED do l\u00EDbiv\u00E9ho h\u00E1vu ekologick\u00FDch d\u016Fraz\u016F. Sou\u010Dasn\u011B m\u016F\u017Ee sv\u00FDm akcentem na revizi \u017Eivotn\u00EDch zp\u016Fsob\u016F a um\u00EDrn\u011Bnost konzumu v\u00FDrazn\u011B p\u0159isp\u011Bt ke kultivaci udr\u017Eiteln\u00E9ho integr\u00E1ln\u00EDho rozvoje lidstva a p\u0159\u00EDrodn\u00EDho prost\u0159ed\u00ED." . "Princip trvale udr\u017Eiteln\u00E9ho rozvoje v soci\u00E1ln\u00EDm u\u010Den\u00ED c\u00EDrkve"@cs . "12"^^ . . . "Kn\u011Bz, Miroslav" . "RIV/60076658:12260/14:43888244" . "Princip trvale udr\u017Eiteln\u00E9ho rozvoje v soci\u00E1ln\u00EDm u\u010Den\u00ED c\u00EDrkve"@cs . "\u010Cl\u00E1nek p\u0159edkl\u00E1d\u00E1 kontext a rozvoj pojmu trvale udr\u017Eiteln\u00E9ho rozvoje a klade si ot\u00E1zku, nakolik je uplatn\u011Bn a reflektov\u00E1n v soci\u00E1ln\u00EDm u\u010Den\u00ED c\u00EDrkve a v \u0161ir\u0161\u00EDm kontextu k\u0159es\u0165ansk\u00E9 etiky. Sleduje v\u00FDvoj pojmu v pr\u016Fb\u011Bhu t\u0159\u00ED konferenc\u00ED OSN v\u011Bnovan\u00FDch \u017Eivotn\u00EDmu prost\u0159ed\u00ED (Stockholm, Rio de Janeiro, Johannesburg) i v n\u00E1sledn\u00E9 odborn\u00E9 a ideologick\u00E9 debat\u011B ohledn\u011B obsahu a d\u016Fsledk\u016F dan\u00E9ho pojmu. D\u00E1le je zkoum\u00E1no t\u00E9ma rozvoje a udr\u017Eiteln\u00E9ho rozvoje v dokumentech soci\u00E1ln\u00EDho u\u010Den\u00ED katolick\u00E9 c\u00EDrkve i v k\u0159es\u0165ansk\u00E9m soci\u00E1ln\u011B-etick\u00E9m my\u0161len\u00ED, jeho postupn\u00E1 recepce i odli\u0161nosti v\u016F\u010Di jeho obecn\u00E9mu u\u017Eit\u00ED. V pr\u016Fb\u011Bhu intenzifikace ekologick\u00E9ho v\u011Bdom\u00ED v z\u00E1sad\u011B soci\u00E1ln\u00ED u\u010Den\u00ED c\u00EDrkve postupn\u011B p\u0159ijalo koncept trvale udr\u017Eiteln\u00E9ho rozvoje v jeho z\u00E1kladn\u00EDm v\u00FDznamu mezigenera\u010Dn\u00ED solidarity a ohled\u016F v\u016F\u010Di p\u0159\u00EDrod\u011B. Zasazuje jej v\u0161ak do \u0161ir\u0161\u00EDho konceptu integr\u00E1ln\u00EDho rozvoje \u010Dlov\u011Bka a lidstva a akcentuje antropologick\u00FD rozm\u011Br ekologick\u00E9 ot\u00E1zky v kontextu biblick\u00E9 a teologick\u00E9 antropologie. Krom\u011B ekologick\u00FDch a ekonomicko-rozvojov\u00FDch akcent\u016F zd\u016Fraz\u0148uje z\u00E1sadn\u011B i rozm\u011Br d\u016Fstojnosti \u010Dlov\u011Bka a jeho \u017Eivota od p\u0159irozen\u00E9ho po\u010D\u00E1tku do p\u0159irozen\u00E9ho konce. Neztoto\u017E\u0148uje se tak s radik\u00E1ln\u011Bj\u0161\u00EDmi ekologick\u00FDmi koncepcemi, kter\u00E9 maj\u00ED ekocentrick\u00FD \u010Di biocentrick\u00FD charakter a jsou p\u0159\u00EDli\u0161 skeptick\u00E9 v\u016F\u010Di perspektiv\u011B dynamiky dal\u0161\u00EDho rozvoje, nebo naopak v\u016F\u010Di pot\u0159eb\u011B omezen\u00ED konzumismu. D\u016Fraz soci\u00E1ln\u00EDho u\u010Den\u00ED c\u00EDrkve na kulturu \u017Eivota bude st\u00E1t v trval\u00E9 opozici v\u016F\u010Di nov\u00FDm a mocn\u00FDm n\u00E1stroj\u016Fm %22kultury smrti%22, kter\u00E9 se mnohdy zaobaluj\u00ED do l\u00EDbiv\u00E9ho h\u00E1vu ekologick\u00FDch d\u016Fraz\u016F. Sou\u010Dasn\u011B m\u016F\u017Ee sv\u00FDm akcentem na revizi \u017Eivotn\u00EDch zp\u016Fsob\u016F a um\u00EDrn\u011Bnost konzumu v\u00FDrazn\u011B p\u0159isp\u011Bt ke kultivaci udr\u017Eiteln\u00E9ho integr\u00E1ln\u00EDho rozvoje lidstva a p\u0159\u00EDrodn\u00EDho prost\u0159ed\u00ED."@cs . "2"^^ . "2" . "RIV/60076658:12260/14:43888244!RIV15-MSM-12260___" . .