. "21"^^ . . "This article deals with the question of Suarez's conception of being, which prima facie seems to oscillate between a Scotistic univocal conception and a conception of being according to the analogy of intrinsic attribution. The paper intends to show that Suarez's doctrine can in no way be interpreted as representative of the univocal conception, and proceeds in six steps. First, it highlights the importance of the Uncommon Doctor's theory of the unity of both the formal and the objective concepts of being. In the second part, the paper asks how the concept of being can, without any internal differentiation and structure, give rise to the different relations that it has to the natures subordinated to it. In the second and the third parts, this question receives an answer against the background of Suarez's critique of Scotus's conception, and with the help of his theory of the radical intimate transcendence of being. In the fourth section, there follows an exposition of Suarez" . "Je Su\u00E1rez\u016Fv pojem jsoucna analogick\u00FD nebo jednozna\u010Dn\u00FD?"@cs . "LXXXI" . . . "12260" . "Is Suarez's concept of being analogical or univocal?"@en . . "This article deals with the question of Suarez's conception of being, which prima facie seems to oscillate between a Scotistic univocal conception and a conception of being according to the analogy of intrinsic attribution. The paper intends to show that Suarez's doctrine can in no way be interpreted as representative of the univocal conception, and proceeds in six steps. First, it highlights the importance of the Uncommon Doctor's theory of the unity of both the formal and the objective concepts of being. In the second part, the paper asks how the concept of being can, without any internal differentiation and structure, give rise to the different relations that it has to the natures subordinated to it. In the second and the third parts, this question receives an answer against the background of Suarez's critique of Scotus's conception, and with the help of his theory of the radical intimate transcendence of being. In the fourth section, there follows an exposition of Suarez"@en . "V" . . "RIV/60076658:12260/07:00009325" . "Suarez; philosophy; concept of being"@en . "RIV/60076658:12260/07:00009325!RIV09-MSM-12260___" . . "1051-3558" . "Is Suarez's concept of being analogical or univocal?" . . . "American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly" . . . "V \u010Dl\u00E1nku autor analyzuje Su\u00E1rezovu koncepci pojmu jsoucna. Ukazuje nakolik je jeho teorie inspirov\u00E1na scotistick\u00FDm argumenty ve prosp\u011Bch jednozna\u010Dnosti pojmu jsoucna. Nicm\u00E9n\u011B zd\u016Fraz\u0148uje, \u017Ee Su\u00E1rezovu koncepci v \u017E\u00E1dn\u00E9m p\u0159\u00EDpad\u011B nem\u016F\u017Eeme pova\u017Eovat za teori\u00ED jednozna\u010Dnosti pojmu jsoucna, ale za teorii analogie vnit\u0159n\u00ED atribuce."@cs . "1"^^ . . "000249590900002" . "Is Suarez's concept of being analogical or univocal?"@en . "US - Spojen\u00E9 st\u00E1ty americk\u00E9" . "Is Suarez's concept of being analogical or univocal?" . "Heider, Daniel" . . "[AB39412A9B97]" . "1" . "1"^^ . "Je Su\u00E1rez\u016Fv pojem jsoucna analogick\u00FD nebo jednozna\u010Dn\u00FD?"@cs . . "427592" .