"C\u00EDlem studie bylo validizovat prioritn\u00ED intervence NIC (Nursing Interventions Classification) a o\u010Dek\u00E1van\u00E9 v\u00FDsledky NOC (Nursing Outcomes Classification) u pacient\u016F hospitalizovan\u00FDch na jednotce intenzivn\u00ED p\u00E9\u010De s o\u0161et\u0159ovatelskou diagn\u00F3zou Neefektivn\u00ED vzorec d\u00FDch\u00E1n\u00ED. K ov\u011B\u0159en\u00ED prioritn\u00EDch intervenc\u00ED a o\u010Dek\u00E1van\u00FDch v\u00FDsledk\u016F pomohlo dvacet expert\u016F, kte\u0159\u00ED p\u0159i\u0159azovali jednotliv\u00FDm intervenc\u00EDm a v\u00FDsledk\u016Fm sk\u00F3re pomoc\u00ED Likertovy \u0161k\u00E1ly. B\u011Bhem testov\u00E1n\u00ED m\u011Bli experti za pomoci Likertovy \u0161k\u00E1ly ozna\u010Dit, jak vykon\u00E1vaj\u00ED jednotliv\u00E9 \u010Dinnosti u vybran\u00FDch NIC a jak hodnot\u00ED jednotliv\u00E9 indik\u00E1tory u vybran\u00FDch NOC. Vybrat mohli na n\u00E1sleduj\u00EDc\u00ED \u0161k\u00E1le: 1=v\u016Fbec ne, 2=z\u0159\u00EDdka, 3=n\u011Bkdy, 4=mnohokr\u00E1t, 5=v\u017Edy. Data byla n\u00E1sledn\u011B analyzov\u00E1na p\u0159i\u0159azen\u00EDm hodnoty ke ka\u017Ed\u00E9 z odpov\u011Bd\u00ED (1=0; 2=0,25; 3=0,5; 4=0,75; 5=1). Maxim\u00E1ln\u00ED hodnota, kterou bylo mo\u017En\u00E9 v hodnocen\u00E9 oblasti z\u00EDskat, byla hodnota 1, minim\u00E1ln\u00ED byla 0. Aktivity (u NIC) a indik\u00E1tory (u NOC), kter\u00E9 z\u00EDskaly hodnotu ?0,8, byly ozna\u010Deny jako prioritn\u011B pou\u017E\u00EDvan\u00E9. V p\u0159\u00EDpad\u011B, \u017Ee z\u00EDskaly hodnotu ?0,5, byly vy\u0159azeny z d\u016Fvodu, \u017Ee je sestry prov\u00E1d\u011Bj\u00ED minim\u00E1ln\u011B \u010Di v\u016Fbec. Ostatn\u00ED byly br\u00E1ny jako b\u011B\u017En\u011B pou\u017E\u00EDvan\u00E9. Na z\u00E1klad\u011B anal\u00FDzy souvisej\u00EDc\u00EDch NIC, konkr\u00E9tn\u011B se jednalo o Monitorov\u00E1n\u00ED d\u00FDch\u00E1n\u00ED 3350, Pomoc p\u0159i ventilaci 3390, Fyzioterapie hrudn\u00EDku 3230, Ods\u00E1v\u00E1n\u00ED d\u00FDchac\u00EDch cest 3160 a Zaji\u0161t\u011Bn\u00ED d\u00FDchac\u00EDch cest 3140, jsme do\u0161li k z\u00E1v\u011Bru, \u017Ee z celkov\u00E9ho po\u010Dtu 158 aktivit bylo sestrami vyu\u017E\u00EDv\u00E1no pouze 62. U NOC bylo z celkov\u00E9ho po\u010Dtu 83 indik\u00E1tor\u016F hodnoceno 50 indik\u00E1tor\u016F, p\u0159i\u010Dem\u017E 32 lze pova\u017Eovat jako typicky hodnocen\u00E9. Z t\u011Bchto v\u00FDsledk\u016F lze vyvodit, \u017Ee v\u011Bt\u0161ina intervenc\u00ED NIC byla na\u0161imi experty pova\u017Eov\u00E1na za nepou\u017Eiteln\u00E9. Naopak u indik\u00E1tor\u016F NOC byla v\u00EDce jak polovina hodnocena jako u\u017Eite\u010Dn\u00E1. V\u00FDsledky t\u00E9to studie poukazuj\u00ED na fakt, \u017Ee p\u0159\u00EDpadn\u00E9 zav\u00E1d\u011Bn\u00ED klasifika\u010Dn\u00EDch syst\u00E9mu NIC a NOC si vy\u017Eaduje dal\u0161\u00ED testov\u00E1n\u00ED v klinick\u00E9 praxi v podm\u00EDnk\u00E1ch \u010Cesk\u00E9 republiky, aby je bylo mo\u017En\u00E9 efektivn\u011B vyu\u017E\u00EDvat" . . . "16" . "The aim of the study was to validate the priority interventions NIC (Nursing Interventions Classification) and the expected results NOC (Nursing Outcomes Classification) in patients hospitalized in intensive care unit with nursing diagnosis ineffective breathing pattern . Twenty experts helped with the verification of priority interventions and expected results. They assigned score using Likert scale to individual interventions and results. During testing, the experts had to indicate with the help of Likert scale how they perform various activities in selected NIC and how they evaluate different indicators in selected NOC. They could select from the following scale: 1 = not at all, 2 = seldom, 3 = sometimes, 4 = many times, 5 = always. The data were consequently analyzed by assigning a value to each of the responses (1 = 0; 2 = 0.25; 3 = 0.5; 4 = 0.75; 5 = 1). The maximum value that could be achieved in the evaluated field was 1, the minimum was 0. Activities (for NIC) and indicators (for NOC) which reached the value ?0.8, were identified as the priority use. In case that they achieved the value ?0.5, they were excluded on the reason that the nurses perform them minimally or not at all. Others were taken as commonly used. Based on the analysis of related NIC (specifically, it was respiratory monitoring 3350, ventilation assistance 3390, chest physiotherapy 3230, airways suctioning 3160 and airways management 3140 ), we concluded that only 62 activities from a total number 158 were used by nurses. In NOC from a total number of 83, 50 indicators were assessed and 32 can be considered typically rated. On the basis of the results our experts consider most of NIC interventions unusable. On the other hand, more than half of NOC indicators were rated as useful. The results of the study point to the fact that possible introduction of classification systems NIC and NOC requires further testing in clinical practice in the Czech Republic in order to use them effectively."@en . . . "Kontakt (v\u011Bdeck\u00FD \u010Dasopis ZSF JU)" . "Prioritn\u00ED intervence NIC a o\u010Dek\u00E1van\u00E9 v\u00FDsledky NOC u pacient\u016F s o\u0161et\u0159ovatelskou diagn\u00F3zou Neefektivn\u00ED vzorec d\u00FDch\u00E1n\u00ED"@cs . . "RIV/60076658:12110/14:43887916" . . "Priority interventions from the NIC and expected results from the NOC in patients with a nursing diagnosis of Ineffective breathing pattern"@en . "2"^^ . . "12110" . "Dol\u00E1k, Franti\u0161ek" . "2"^^ . . . . . . "1212-4117" . "39429" . . . . . "N" . "9"^^ . "T\u00F3thov\u00E1, Val\u00E9rie" . . . "Prioritn\u00ED intervence NIC a o\u010Dek\u00E1van\u00E9 v\u00FDsledky NOC u pacient\u016F s o\u0161et\u0159ovatelskou diagn\u00F3zou Neefektivn\u00ED vzorec d\u00FDch\u00E1n\u00ED"@cs . . "Prioritn\u00ED intervence NIC a o\u010Dek\u00E1van\u00E9 v\u00FDsledky NOC u pacient\u016F s o\u0161et\u0159ovatelskou diagn\u00F3zou Neefektivn\u00ED vzorec d\u00FDch\u00E1n\u00ED" . . "pattern; breathing; Ineffective; diagnosis; nursing; with; patients; NOC; the; from; results; expected; and; NIC; interventions; Priority"@en . "RIV/60076658:12110/14:43887916!RIV15-MSM-12110___" . "Prioritn\u00ED intervence NIC a o\u010Dek\u00E1van\u00E9 v\u00FDsledky NOC u pacient\u016F s o\u0161et\u0159ovatelskou diagn\u00F3zou Neefektivn\u00ED vzorec d\u00FDch\u00E1n\u00ED" . . "[68E00939FF89]" . . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . "2" . "Priority interventions from the NIC and expected results from the NOC in patients with a nursing diagnosis of Ineffective breathing pattern"@en . . "C\u00EDlem studie bylo validizovat prioritn\u00ED intervence NIC (Nursing Interventions Classification) a o\u010Dek\u00E1van\u00E9 v\u00FDsledky NOC (Nursing Outcomes Classification) u pacient\u016F hospitalizovan\u00FDch na jednotce intenzivn\u00ED p\u00E9\u010De s o\u0161et\u0159ovatelskou diagn\u00F3zou Neefektivn\u00ED vzorec d\u00FDch\u00E1n\u00ED. K ov\u011B\u0159en\u00ED prioritn\u00EDch intervenc\u00ED a o\u010Dek\u00E1van\u00FDch v\u00FDsledk\u016F pomohlo dvacet expert\u016F, kte\u0159\u00ED p\u0159i\u0159azovali jednotliv\u00FDm intervenc\u00EDm a v\u00FDsledk\u016Fm sk\u00F3re pomoc\u00ED Likertovy \u0161k\u00E1ly. B\u011Bhem testov\u00E1n\u00ED m\u011Bli experti za pomoci Likertovy \u0161k\u00E1ly ozna\u010Dit, jak vykon\u00E1vaj\u00ED jednotliv\u00E9 \u010Dinnosti u vybran\u00FDch NIC a jak hodnot\u00ED jednotliv\u00E9 indik\u00E1tory u vybran\u00FDch NOC. Vybrat mohli na n\u00E1sleduj\u00EDc\u00ED \u0161k\u00E1le: 1=v\u016Fbec ne, 2=z\u0159\u00EDdka, 3=n\u011Bkdy, 4=mnohokr\u00E1t, 5=v\u017Edy. Data byla n\u00E1sledn\u011B analyzov\u00E1na p\u0159i\u0159azen\u00EDm hodnoty ke ka\u017Ed\u00E9 z odpov\u011Bd\u00ED (1=0; 2=0,25; 3=0,5; 4=0,75; 5=1). Maxim\u00E1ln\u00ED hodnota, kterou bylo mo\u017En\u00E9 v hodnocen\u00E9 oblasti z\u00EDskat, byla hodnota 1, minim\u00E1ln\u00ED byla 0. Aktivity (u NIC) a indik\u00E1tory (u NOC), kter\u00E9 z\u00EDskaly hodnotu ?0,8, byly ozna\u010Deny jako prioritn\u011B pou\u017E\u00EDvan\u00E9. V p\u0159\u00EDpad\u011B, \u017Ee z\u00EDskaly hodnotu ?0,5, byly vy\u0159azeny z d\u016Fvodu, \u017Ee je sestry prov\u00E1d\u011Bj\u00ED minim\u00E1ln\u011B \u010Di v\u016Fbec. Ostatn\u00ED byly br\u00E1ny jako b\u011B\u017En\u011B pou\u017E\u00EDvan\u00E9. Na z\u00E1klad\u011B anal\u00FDzy souvisej\u00EDc\u00EDch NIC, konkr\u00E9tn\u011B se jednalo o Monitorov\u00E1n\u00ED d\u00FDch\u00E1n\u00ED 3350, Pomoc p\u0159i ventilaci 3390, Fyzioterapie hrudn\u00EDku 3230, Ods\u00E1v\u00E1n\u00ED d\u00FDchac\u00EDch cest 3160 a Zaji\u0161t\u011Bn\u00ED d\u00FDchac\u00EDch cest 3140, jsme do\u0161li k z\u00E1v\u011Bru, \u017Ee z celkov\u00E9ho po\u010Dtu 158 aktivit bylo sestrami vyu\u017E\u00EDv\u00E1no pouze 62. U NOC bylo z celkov\u00E9ho po\u010Dtu 83 indik\u00E1tor\u016F hodnoceno 50 indik\u00E1tor\u016F, p\u0159i\u010Dem\u017E 32 lze pova\u017Eovat jako typicky hodnocen\u00E9. Z t\u011Bchto v\u00FDsledk\u016F lze vyvodit, \u017Ee v\u011Bt\u0161ina intervenc\u00ED NIC byla na\u0161imi experty pova\u017Eov\u00E1na za nepou\u017Eiteln\u00E9. Naopak u indik\u00E1tor\u016F NOC byla v\u00EDce jak polovina hodnocena jako u\u017Eite\u010Dn\u00E1. V\u00FDsledky t\u00E9to studie poukazuj\u00ED na fakt, \u017Ee p\u0159\u00EDpadn\u00E9 zav\u00E1d\u011Bn\u00ED klasifika\u010Dn\u00EDch syst\u00E9mu NIC a NOC si vy\u017Eaduje dal\u0161\u00ED testov\u00E1n\u00ED v klinick\u00E9 praxi v podm\u00EDnk\u00E1ch \u010Cesk\u00E9 republiky, aby je bylo mo\u017En\u00E9 efektivn\u011B vyu\u017E\u00EDvat"@cs . . . . . .