"Blahutkov\u00E1, Daniela" . "23330" . . "Pato\u010Dkovy rozbory liter\u00E1rn\u00EDch d\u011Bl a jejich vztah k Pato\u010Dkov\u011B filozofii um\u011Bn\u00ED a dal\u0161\u00EDm oblastem jeho my\u0161len\u00ED"@cs . . "P(GAP409/11/0324)" . "[99A0EC665448]" . . . . "Pato\u010Dka?s analyses of works of literature and their relation to Pato\u010Dka?s philosophy of art and other fields of his thought"@en . "Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Philosophica et Historica. Studia Aesthetica VI" . . "Neuveden" . . . "0567-8293" . "RIV/49777513:23330/13:43920823!RIV14-GA0-23330___" . "Pato\u010Dkovy rozbory liter\u00E1rn\u00EDch d\u011Bl a jejich vztah k Pato\u010Dkov\u011B filozofii um\u011Bn\u00ED a dal\u0161\u00EDm oblastem jeho my\u0161len\u00ED" . "95522" . "1"^^ . . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . "1"^^ . . "Pato\u010Dkovy rozbory liter\u00E1rn\u00EDch d\u011Bl a jejich vztah k Pato\u010Dkov\u011B filozofii um\u011Bn\u00ED a dal\u0161\u00EDm oblastem jeho my\u0161len\u00ED" . "1" . . . "\u010Cl\u00E1nek zkoum\u00E1 Pato\u010Dkovy rozbory liter\u00E1rn\u00EDch d\u011Bl k n\u011Bkolika oblastem jeho my\u0161len\u00ED. Vych\u00E1z\u00ED z teze, \u017Ee Pato\u010Dkovy interpretace liter\u00E1rn\u00EDch d\u011Bl (zejm\u00E9na modern\u00EDch) nevykazuj\u00ED tyt\u00E9\u017E akcenty jako jeho \u00FAvahy o um\u011Bn\u00ED ze stat\u00ED Um\u011Bn\u00ED a \u010Das \u010Di Spisovatel a jeho v\u011Bc. D\u00E1le ukazuje souvislost kl\u00ED\u010Dov\u00FDch motiv\u016F Pato\u010Dkov\u00FDch rozbor\u016F liter\u00E1rn\u00EDch d\u011Bl s jeho koncepc\u00ED existenci\u00E1ln\u00EDch pohyb\u016F a v\u0161\u00EDm\u00E1 si Pato\u010Dkov\u00FDch n\u00E1rok\u016F vzhledem ke spisovateli i jeho \u00FAvah o charakteru a mo\u017Enostech narativn\u00EDch um\u011Bn\u00ED v prost\u0159ed\u00ED krize smyslu."@cs . . "Pato\u010Dkovy rozbory liter\u00E1rn\u00EDch d\u011Bl a jejich vztah k Pato\u010Dkov\u011B filozofii um\u011Bn\u00ED a dal\u0161\u00EDm oblastem jeho my\u0161len\u00ED"@cs . "RIV/49777513:23330/13:43920823" . "14"^^ . "Jan Pato\u010Dka; modern literature; philosophy of art"@en . "\u010Cl\u00E1nek zkoum\u00E1 Pato\u010Dkovy rozbory liter\u00E1rn\u00EDch d\u011Bl k n\u011Bkolika oblastem jeho my\u0161len\u00ED. Vych\u00E1z\u00ED z teze, \u017Ee Pato\u010Dkovy interpretace liter\u00E1rn\u00EDch d\u011Bl (zejm\u00E9na modern\u00EDch) nevykazuj\u00ED tyt\u00E9\u017E akcenty jako jeho \u00FAvahy o um\u011Bn\u00ED ze stat\u00ED Um\u011Bn\u00ED a \u010Das \u010Di Spisovatel a jeho v\u011Bc. D\u00E1le ukazuje souvislost kl\u00ED\u010Dov\u00FDch motiv\u016F Pato\u010Dkov\u00FDch rozbor\u016F liter\u00E1rn\u00EDch d\u011Bl s jeho koncepc\u00ED existenci\u00E1ln\u00EDch pohyb\u016F a v\u0161\u00EDm\u00E1 si Pato\u010Dkov\u00FDch n\u00E1rok\u016F vzhledem ke spisovateli i jeho \u00FAvah o charakteru a mo\u017Enostech narativn\u00EDch um\u011Bn\u00ED v prost\u0159ed\u00ED krize smyslu." . "Pato\u010Dka?s analyses of works of literature and their relation to Pato\u010Dka?s philosophy of art and other fields of his thought"@en . "The article focuses on Pato\u010Dka?s analyses of works of literature and presents these analyses first in relation to Pato\u010Dka?s theoretical essays on art in general and on literature. Considering that, in several essays from the 1960s, Pato\u010Dka discusses modern art from the perspective of his thesis about the difference between meaning in earlier art (the artistic era) and in contemporary art (the aesthetic era), the article pays special attention to his analyses of twentieth-century works of literature ? Thomas Mann?s Doktor Faustus (1947), Jaroslav Durych?s Bo\u017E\u00ED duha (written 1955; 1969), and William Faulkner?s Wild Palms (1939). He thus demonstrates that the analyses cannot be read as illustrations of Pato\u010Dka?s theoretical essays on art and that they refer also to a number of other areas of Pato\u010Dka?s thinking. The article demonstrates (1) how his interpretations of literary themes lead to analysis of concerns about being and to the conception of the existential movements connected with them; (2) how Pato\u010Dka?s analyses are in harmony with his understanding of works of literature as ?examples?, always clarifying, in a unique and specific way, what existence is; and (3) how literary subject matter for Pato\u010Dka is always an historical statement that articulates the spiritual movements in the periods when it accompanies humankind in self-understanding. In conclusion, the article considers Pato\u010Dka?s thesis about the problematization of meaning in modern art and the connected transformation of formal means (for which, however, there is little support in the essays that this article examines)."@en . . . .