. . "23330" . "S" . "1210-0250" . . "Reassessing the Righteousness of Kuhn's Criticism of the Strong Programme in the Sociology of Knowledge"@en . "Benda, Libor" . "161548" . . . . . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . . . "25"^^ . "Teorie v\u011Bdy. Theory of Science" . "RIV/49777513:23330/12:43916219!RIV13-MSM-23330___" . . "1"^^ . . . . . "2" . . . "Reassessing the Righteousness of Kuhn's Criticism of the Strong Programme in the Sociology of Knowledge"@en . "P\u0159ezkoum\u00E1n\u00ED opr\u00E1vn\u011Bnosti Kuhnovy kritiky siln\u00E9ho programu sociologie v\u011Bd\u011Bn\u00ED" . "RIV/49777513:23330/12:43916219" . "1"^^ . "P\u0159ezkoum\u00E1n\u00ED opr\u00E1vn\u011Bnosti Kuhnovy kritiky siln\u00E9ho programu sociologie v\u011Bd\u011Bn\u00ED" . "In his later works, Thomas Kuhn sharply attacks the so-called strong programme in the sociology of knowledge and disavows it thoroughly. This is curious due to the fact that the representatives of the strong programme, by contrast, openly endorse Kuhn and substantially draw on his work. They perceive in it a set of key ideas, which imply the possibility of a sociological analysis of scientific knowledge. The aim of the paper is to reassess Kuhn's criticism of the strong programme and to evaluate its righteousness. For this purpose the paper first of all reconstructs Kuhn's account of the strong programme, which is compared afterwards with the works of its founders David Bloor and Barry Barnes, where it is theoretically developed. In the following section, Kuhn's arguments against the strong programme are confronted with a historical paper, where it is applied in practice. The third section compares Kuhn's own approach to science with the strong programme in those very aspects, which Kuhn criticises."@en . "34" . "http://teorievedy.flu.cas.cz/index.php/tv/article/view/151/169" . "Thomas Kuhn ve sv\u00FDch pozd\u011Bj\u0161\u00EDch prac\u00EDch ost\u0159e napad\u00E1 tzv. siln\u00FD program sociologie v\u011Bd\u011Bn\u00ED a d\u016Fsledn\u011B se v\u016F\u010Di n\u011Bmu vymezuje. Tato skute\u010Dnost je zaj\u00EDmav\u00E1 z toho d\u016Fvodu, \u017Ee p\u0159edstavitel\u00E9 siln\u00E9ho programu se naopak ke Kuhnovi otev\u0159en\u011B hl\u00E1s\u00ED a vydatn\u011B \u010Derpaj\u00ED z jeho d\u00EDla, nebo\u0165 v n\u011Bm spat\u0159uj\u00ED \u0159adu kl\u00ED\u010Dov\u00FDch my\u0161lenek, kter\u00E9 implikuj\u00ED mo\u017Enost sociologick\u00E9 anal\u00FDzy v\u011Bdeck\u00E9ho pozn\u00E1n\u00ED. C\u00EDlem t\u00E9to studie je kriticky p\u0159ezkoumat Kuhnovu kritiku siln\u00E9ho programu a zhodnotit jej\u00ED opr\u00E1vn\u011Bnost. V prvn\u00ED \u010D\u00E1sti je za t\u00EDmto \u00FA\u010Delem nejprve rekonstruov\u00E1no Kuhnovo pojet\u00ED siln\u00E9ho programu, je\u017E je posl\u00E9ze porovn\u00E1no s pracemi jeho zakladatel\u016F Davida Bloora a Barryho Barnese, v nich\u017E je siln\u00FD program teoreticky rozv\u00EDjen. V dal\u0161\u00ED \u010D\u00E1sti jsou Kuhnovy argumenty proti siln\u00E9mu programu konfrontov\u00E1ny s vybranou historickou studi\u00ED, v n\u00ED\u017E je siln\u00FD program aplikov\u00E1n v praxi. T\u0159et\u00ED \u010D\u00E1st pak obrac\u00ED pozornost ke Kuhnovu vlastn\u00EDmu pojet\u00ED v\u011Bdy, kter\u00E9 je v n\u00ED porovn\u00E1no se siln\u00FDm programem pr\u00E1v\u011B v t\u011Bch aspektech, je\u017E na n\u011Bm Kuhn kritizuje." . "P\u0159ezkoum\u00E1n\u00ED opr\u00E1vn\u011Bnosti Kuhnovy kritiky siln\u00E9ho programu sociologie v\u011Bd\u011Bn\u00ED"@cs . "[E72A48943561]" . "P\u0159ezkoum\u00E1n\u00ED opr\u00E1vn\u011Bnosti Kuhnovy kritiky siln\u00E9ho programu sociologie v\u011Bd\u011Bn\u00ED"@cs . "Thomas Kuhn ve sv\u00FDch pozd\u011Bj\u0161\u00EDch prac\u00EDch ost\u0159e napad\u00E1 tzv. siln\u00FD program sociologie v\u011Bd\u011Bn\u00ED a d\u016Fsledn\u011B se v\u016F\u010Di n\u011Bmu vymezuje. Tato skute\u010Dnost je zaj\u00EDmav\u00E1 z toho d\u016Fvodu, \u017Ee p\u0159edstavitel\u00E9 siln\u00E9ho programu se naopak ke Kuhnovi otev\u0159en\u011B hl\u00E1s\u00ED a vydatn\u011B \u010Derpaj\u00ED z jeho d\u00EDla, nebo\u0165 v n\u011Bm spat\u0159uj\u00ED \u0159adu kl\u00ED\u010Dov\u00FDch my\u0161lenek, kter\u00E9 implikuj\u00ED mo\u017Enost sociologick\u00E9 anal\u00FDzy v\u011Bdeck\u00E9ho pozn\u00E1n\u00ED. C\u00EDlem t\u00E9to studie je kriticky p\u0159ezkoumat Kuhnovu kritiku siln\u00E9ho programu a zhodnotit jej\u00ED opr\u00E1vn\u011Bnost. V prvn\u00ED \u010D\u00E1sti je za t\u00EDmto \u00FA\u010Delem nejprve rekonstruov\u00E1no Kuhnovo pojet\u00ED siln\u00E9ho programu, je\u017E je posl\u00E9ze porovn\u00E1no s pracemi jeho zakladatel\u016F Davida Bloora a Barryho Barnese, v nich\u017E je siln\u00FD program teoreticky rozv\u00EDjen. V dal\u0161\u00ED \u010D\u00E1sti jsou Kuhnovy argumenty proti siln\u00E9mu programu konfrontov\u00E1ny s vybranou historickou studi\u00ED, v n\u00ED\u017E je siln\u00FD program aplikov\u00E1n v praxi. T\u0159et\u00ED \u010D\u00E1st pak obrac\u00ED pozornost ke Kuhnovu vlastn\u00EDmu pojet\u00ED v\u011Bdy, kter\u00E9 je v n\u00ED porovn\u00E1no se siln\u00FDm programem pr\u00E1v\u011B v t\u011Bch aspektech, je\u017E na n\u011Bm Kuhn kritizuje."@cs . "strong programme; sociology of scientific knowledge; sociology of knowledge; Barry Barnes; David Bloor; Thomas Samuel Kuhn"@en . . .