"\u017D\u00E1\u010Dkov\u00E1, Eva" . "Spor o p\u0159irozenost \u010Dlov\u011Bka na pozad\u00ED transhumanistick\u00E9ho hnut\u00ED a jeho opozice" . . . "S" . "23330" . . "RIV/49777513:23330/08:00502495!RIV10-MSM-23330___" . . "978-80-7043-755-1" . "Teorie a d\u011Bjiny v\u011Bdy a techniky" . "Disputation on Human Nature on the Background of Transhumanism and its Opposition"@en . "Spor o p\u0159irozenost \u010Dlov\u011Bka na pozad\u00ED transhumanistick\u00E9ho hnut\u00ED a jeho opozice"@cs . . . . . . "Jedn\u00EDm ze z\u00E1va\u017En\u00FDch t\u00E9mat, kter\u00E1 se \u010Dasto objevuj\u00ED na poli transhumanismu, je ot\u00E1zka lidsk\u00E9 p\u0159irozenosti. Biokonzervativn\u00ED opozice odm\u00EDt\u00E1 transhumanistick\u00E9 principy sebedeterminace a sebetransformace jedince prost\u0159ednictv\u00EDm biotechnologick\u00FDch z\u00E1sah\u016F, proto\u017Ee se domn\u00EDv\u00E1, \u017Ee povedou k naru\u0161en\u00ED p\u0159irozen\u00E9ho z\u00E1kladu lidstv\u00ED, je\u017E se utv\u00E1\u0159el dlouhodob\u011B v pr\u016Fb\u011Bhu evoluce. Habermas vyjad\u0159uje podobnou obavu z eugenick\u00FDch z\u00E1sah\u016F ji\u017E v embryon\u00E1ln\u00EDm st\u00E1diu v\u00FDvoje jedince. Ty podle n\u011Bj mohou v\u00E9st ke zni\u010Den\u00ED rodov\u011B-etick\u00E9ho sebeporozum\u011Bn\u00ED \u010Dlov\u011Bka. V neposledn\u00ED \u0159ad\u011B takov\u00FD p\u0159\u00EDstup hroz\u00ED p\u0159er\u016Fst v samoz\u0159ejm\u00E9 instrument\u00E1ln\u00ED zach\u00E1zen\u00ED s lidsk\u00FDm \u017Eivotem, kter\u00E9 vytv\u00E1\u0159\u00ED mor\u00E1ln\u00ED vakuum v lidsk\u00E9m \u017Eivot\u011B, kter\u00E9 Habermas vid\u00ED jako n\u011Bco z\u00E1sadn\u011B neodpov\u00EDdaj\u00EDc\u00EDho pot\u0159eb\u00E1m na\u0161eho \u017Eivota, ve kter\u00E9m se realizujeme pr\u00E1v\u011B d\u00EDky mo\u017Enosti odpov\u00EDdat na mor\u00E1ln\u00ED v\u00FDzvy."@cs . . . . "Transhumanism; bioconservatism; human nature; human dignity; modern technology; eugenics; bioethics; J\u00FCrgen Habermas; Francis Fukuyama"@en . "Spor o p\u0159irozenost \u010Dlov\u011Bka na pozad\u00ED transhumanistick\u00E9ho hnut\u00ED a jeho opozice" . "Jedn\u00EDm ze z\u00E1va\u017En\u00FDch t\u00E9mat, kter\u00E1 se \u010Dasto objevuj\u00ED na poli transhumanismu, je ot\u00E1zka lidsk\u00E9 p\u0159irozenosti. Biokonzervativn\u00ED opozice odm\u00EDt\u00E1 transhumanistick\u00E9 principy sebedeterminace a sebetransformace jedince prost\u0159ednictv\u00EDm biotechnologick\u00FDch z\u00E1sah\u016F, proto\u017Ee se domn\u00EDv\u00E1, \u017Ee povedou k naru\u0161en\u00ED p\u0159irozen\u00E9ho z\u00E1kladu lidstv\u00ED, je\u017E se utv\u00E1\u0159el dlouhodob\u011B v pr\u016Fb\u011Bhu evoluce. Habermas vyjad\u0159uje podobnou obavu z eugenick\u00FDch z\u00E1sah\u016F ji\u017E v embryon\u00E1ln\u00EDm st\u00E1diu v\u00FDvoje jedince. Ty podle n\u011Bj mohou v\u00E9st ke zni\u010Den\u00ED rodov\u011B-etick\u00E9ho sebeporozum\u011Bn\u00ED \u010Dlov\u011Bka. V neposledn\u00ED \u0159ad\u011B takov\u00FD p\u0159\u00EDstup hroz\u00ED p\u0159er\u016Fst v samoz\u0159ejm\u00E9 instrument\u00E1ln\u00ED zach\u00E1zen\u00ED s lidsk\u00FDm \u017Eivotem, kter\u00E9 vytv\u00E1\u0159\u00ED mor\u00E1ln\u00ED vakuum v lidsk\u00E9m \u017Eivot\u011B, kter\u00E9 Habermas vid\u00ED jako n\u011Bco z\u00E1sadn\u011B neodpov\u00EDdaj\u00EDc\u00EDho pot\u0159eb\u00E1m na\u0161eho \u017Eivota, ve kter\u00E9m se realizujeme pr\u00E1v\u011B d\u00EDky mo\u017Enosti odpov\u00EDdat na mor\u00E1ln\u00ED v\u00FDzvy." . "RIV/49777513:23330/08:00502495" . . "2008-10-21+02:00"^^ . "Plze\u0148" . "[55F1DF2A7DF9]" . "Plze\u0148" . . . "The transhumanism is a philosophical-scientific orientation, which has flown into the wide technocentric movement in last fifty years. One of the most important topics is the question of human nature. The critical position in my article represent bionconservatism (Francis Fukuyama) and J\u00FCrgen Habermas. Bioconservatism tends to avoid the biotechnological intervention into the human genetic code. According to it this intervention could lead to such a big turning point that we will not be willing to call the new modified beings a human because the changes in genetics mean also changes in ethical views. J\u00FCrgen Habermas also rejects the genetic transformation. He warns us against the lost of human self-understanding and instrumental treatment with human life. Such situation would create an ethical vacuum in human life which strongly does not correspond to human need to form our personality through facing the moral challenges."@en . . . "396626" . . "Spor o p\u0159irozenost \u010Dlov\u011Bka na pozad\u00ED transhumanistick\u00E9ho hnut\u00ED a jeho opozice"@cs . . . "1"^^ . "Z\u00E1pado\u010Desk\u00E1 univerzita v Plzni" . "17"^^ . "1"^^ . "Disputation on Human Nature on the Background of Transhumanism and its Opposition"@en . .