. . . . . "governmentality; Christian pastoral power; Michel Foucault; historici sociology; B\u00F6ckenf\u00F6rde?s thesis; secularization; Modern State building"@en . "23320" . "St\u00E1t jako nositel sekularizace?" . "152" . . . "107692" . . "I" . . "State as Vehicle of Secularization?"@en . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . . "St\u00E1t jako nositel sekularizace?"@cs . . "\u0160ejvl, Michal" . "Pr\u00E1vn\u00EDk" . "RIV/49777513:23320/13:43919366" . "1"^^ . "10" . "RIV/49777513:23320/13:43919366!RIV14-MSM-23320___" . . "1"^^ . . . . "0231-6625" . "St\u00E1t jako nositel sekularizace?" . "State as Vehicle of Secularization?"@en . . "Tento \u010Dl\u00E1nek p\u0159edstavuje polemiku s n\u011Bkter\u00FDmi tezemi Pavla Holl\u00E4ndera vyj\u00E1d\u0159en\u00FDmi v jeho \u010Dl\u00E1nku Soumrak modern\u00EDho st\u00E1tu. Konkr\u00E9tn\u011B se sna\u017E\u00ED uk\u00E1zat, \u017Ee n\u011Bkter\u00E9 %22skryt\u00E9 k\u00F3dy%22 modern\u00EDho st\u00E1tu jsou sp\u00ED\u0161e ne\u017E znaky, kter\u00E9 by spl\u0148ovaly sou\u010Dasn\u00E9 st\u00E1ty, weberovsk\u00FDmi ide\u00E1ln\u00EDmi typy, p\u0159edstavuj\u00EDc\u00EDmi jist\u00E9 tendence v politick\u00E9m uspo\u0159\u00E1d\u00E1n\u00ED Evropy objeviv\u0161\u00EDmi se n\u011Bkdy od dvan\u00E1ct\u00E9ho do dvac\u00E1t\u00E9ho stolet\u00ED. Zejm\u00E9na pak polemizuje s B\u00F6ckenf\u00F6rdeho p\u0159edstavou, \u017Ee modern\u00ED st\u00E1t vznikl v procesu sekularizace a stal se jej\u00EDm %22vehiklem%22. M\u00EDsto toho prezentuje n\u00E1zory historick\u00FDch sociolog\u016F (jako Anderson, Tilly, Ertman \u010Di Gorski), podle nich\u017E st\u00E1t vznikl d\u00EDky ?militaristicko- fisk\u00E1ln\u00EDm? krok\u016Fm podniknut\u00FDm cca od vrcholn\u00E9ho st\u0159edov\u011Bku. Tyto teze pak dopl\u0148uje n\u00E1zory Michela Foucaulta, p\u0159edev\u0161\u00EDm p\u0159edstavou governmentality, rozvinutou v jeho d\u00EDle Securit\u00E9, Territoire, Population, kter\u00E1 nastupuje n\u011Bkdy od \u0161estn\u00E1ct\u00E9ho stolet\u00ED pot\u00E9, co j\u00ED p\u0159ipravila p\u016Fdu pastor\u00E1ln\u00ED moc k\u0159es\u0165anstv\u00ED. Modern\u00ED st\u00E1t je pak ch\u00E1p\u00E1n jen jako jedna z epizod ve v\u00FDvoji governmentality."@cs . "St\u00E1t jako nositel sekularizace?"@cs . . "This article is a polemic with some theses presented by Pavel Holl\u00E4nder in his article Twilight of Modern State. In particular it tries to show that some features of modern state according to Holl\u00E4nder are not fulfilled by contemporary European states and these features could be rather perceived as Weberian ideal types or tendencies and inclinations presented during the development of European political entities from 12th to 20th century. First of all the article argues against B\u00F6ckenf\u00F6rde?s thesis about the creation of state in the process of secularization and thesis that state is a vehicle of secularization. It presents an alternative ?military- fiscal? theory of European state-building (Tilly, Ertman) connected with disciplinary theory of Gorski. At the same time it uses Foucault?s concept of governmentality as a kind of successor od Christian pastoral power to show that modern state is ?only? an episode in governmentality."@en . "26"^^ . "Tento \u010Dl\u00E1nek p\u0159edstavuje polemiku s n\u011Bkter\u00FDmi tezemi Pavla Holl\u00E4ndera vyj\u00E1d\u0159en\u00FDmi v jeho \u010Dl\u00E1nku Soumrak modern\u00EDho st\u00E1tu. Konkr\u00E9tn\u011B se sna\u017E\u00ED uk\u00E1zat, \u017Ee n\u011Bkter\u00E9 %22skryt\u00E9 k\u00F3dy%22 modern\u00EDho st\u00E1tu jsou sp\u00ED\u0161e ne\u017E znaky, kter\u00E9 by spl\u0148ovaly sou\u010Dasn\u00E9 st\u00E1ty, weberovsk\u00FDmi ide\u00E1ln\u00EDmi typy, p\u0159edstavuj\u00EDc\u00EDmi jist\u00E9 tendence v politick\u00E9m uspo\u0159\u00E1d\u00E1n\u00ED Evropy objeviv\u0161\u00EDmi se n\u011Bkdy od dvan\u00E1ct\u00E9ho do dvac\u00E1t\u00E9ho stolet\u00ED. Zejm\u00E9na pak polemizuje s B\u00F6ckenf\u00F6rdeho p\u0159edstavou, \u017Ee modern\u00ED st\u00E1t vznikl v procesu sekularizace a stal se jej\u00EDm %22vehiklem%22. M\u00EDsto toho prezentuje n\u00E1zory historick\u00FDch sociolog\u016F (jako Anderson, Tilly, Ertman \u010Di Gorski), podle nich\u017E st\u00E1t vznikl d\u00EDky ?militaristicko- fisk\u00E1ln\u00EDm? krok\u016Fm podniknut\u00FDm cca od vrcholn\u00E9ho st\u0159edov\u011Bku. Tyto teze pak dopl\u0148uje n\u00E1zory Michela Foucaulta, p\u0159edev\u0161\u00EDm p\u0159edstavou governmentality, rozvinutou v jeho d\u00EDle Securit\u00E9, Territoire, Population, kter\u00E1 nastupuje n\u011Bkdy od \u0161estn\u00E1ct\u00E9ho stolet\u00ED pot\u00E9, co j\u00ED p\u0159ipravila p\u016Fdu pastor\u00E1ln\u00ED moc k\u0159es\u0165anstv\u00ED. Modern\u00ED st\u00E1t je pak ch\u00E1p\u00E1n jen jako jedna z epizod ve v\u00FDvoji governmentality." . . . "[C9C53A5D43A8]" .