"In 2003-2005 in the Hrub\u00FD Jesen\u00EDk conditions we were engaged in the energy analysis of the different types of permanent grassland utilization. The levels of intensity of utilisation were following: I1= (1st cut until May 15th, 4 cuts per year \u2013 cuts at 45-day interval), I2= (1st cut between 16th and 31st May, 3 cuts per year at 60-day interval), I3= (1st cut between 1st and 15th June, 2 cuts per year at 90-day interval) and I4= (1st cut between 16th and 30th June, 1 or 2 cuts per year, second cut after 90 days) and four levels of fertilizer application: F0= no fertilisation, FPK= P30K60N0, FPKN90= P30K60+N90 and FPKN180 = P30K60+N180. We have counted the values of the particular inputs of the additional energy. The energy inputs data moved from 2,17 GJ.ha-1 to 22,70 GJ.ha-1. The biggest share in energy inputs had fertilizers. It was 84.93% by nitrogen fertilization. From the viewpoint of energy benefit and intensiveness on energy inputs it appears the most available utilization of permanent grasslan"@en . "Energy balance of various permanent grassland utilization systems" . . "Svozilov\u00E1, Marie" . "[E3913BC414FE]" . "Energy balance of various permanent grassland utilization systems"@en . . "5"^^ . "Energy balance of various permanent grassland utilization systems" . . "420133" . . "R\u017Eonca, Jozef" . . . "\u0160t\u00FDbnarov\u00E1, Marie" . . "5"^^ . "Energy balance of various permanent grassland utilization systems"@en . . "net energy; energy benefit; fertilization; production of phytomass"@en . . . "Energetick\u00E1 bilance r\u016Fzn\u00FDch syst\u00E9m\u016F vyu\u017Eit\u00ED travn\u00EDch porost\u016F"@cs . "P(QF3018)" . . "1211-3174" . . "2" . . "58-63" . . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . "6"^^ . . "RIV/49608851:_____/07:8P005489!RIV08-MZE-49608851" . "Energetick\u00E1 bilance r\u016Fzn\u00FDch syst\u00E9m\u016F vyu\u017Eit\u00ED travn\u00EDch porost\u016F"@cs . "SCIENTIA AGRICULTURAE BOHEMICA" . . "In 2003-2005 in the Hrub\u00FD Jesen\u00EDk conditions we were engaged in the energy analysis of the different types of permanent grassland utilization. The levels of intensity of utilisation were following: I1= (1st cut until May 15th, 4 cuts per year \u2013 cuts at 45-day interval), I2= (1st cut between 16th and 31st May, 3 cuts per year at 60-day interval), I3= (1st cut between 1st and 15th June, 2 cuts per year at 90-day interval) and I4= (1st cut between 16th and 30th June, 1 or 2 cuts per year, second cut after 90 days) and four levels of fertilizer application: F0= no fertilisation, FPK= P30K60N0, FPKN90= P30K60+N90 and FPKN180 = P30K60+N180. We have counted the values of the particular inputs of the additional energy. The energy inputs data moved from 2,17 GJ.ha-1 to 22,70 GJ.ha-1. The biggest share in energy inputs had fertilizers. It was 84.93% by nitrogen fertilization. From the viewpoint of energy benefit and intensiveness on energy inputs it appears the most available utilization of permanent grasslan" . "Pozd\u00ED\u0161ek, Jan" . . "RIV/49608851:_____/07:8P005489" . . "V podm\u00EDnk\u00E1ch Hrub\u00E9ho Jesen\u00EDku jsme se zab\u00FDvali energetickou anal\u00FDzou r\u016Fzn\u00FDch zp\u016Fsob\u016F vyu\u017E\u00EDv\u00E1n\u00ED TTP v letech 2003 - 2005. V pokusu byly uplatn\u011Bny n\u00E1sleduj\u00EDc\u00ED \u00FArovn\u011B vyu\u017Eit\u00ED: I1= (1. se\u010D do 15. 5., za rok celkem 4 se\u010De v intervalu 45 dn\u00ED), I2= (1. se\u010D do 31. 5., za rok celkem 3 se\u010De v intervalu 60 dn\u00ED), I3= (1. se\u010D do 15. 6., za rok celkem 2 se\u010De v intervalu 90 dn\u00ED) a I4= (1. se\u010D od 15. 6. do 30. 6., celkem 1 \u2013 2 se\u010De za rok, 2. se\u010D za 90 dn\u00ED) a \u010Dty\u0159i \u00FArovn\u011B hnojen\u00ED TTP: F0= bez hnojen\u00ED, FPK= P30K60N0, FPKN90= P30K60+N90 a FPKN180 = P30K60+N180. Vypo\u010D\u00EDtali jsme hodnoty jednotliv\u00FDch vstup\u016F dodatkov\u00E9 energie. Vstupy energie se pohybovali v rozp\u011Bt\u00ED od 2,17 GJ.ha-1 do 22,70 GJ.ha-1. Nejv\u011Bt\u0161\u00ED \u010D\u00E1st\u00ED energetick\u00FDch vklad\u016F byla hnojiva, kter\u00E1 se na nich p\u0159i intenzivn\u00EDm hnojen\u00ED pod\u00EDlela a\u017E do v\u00FD\u0161e 84,93 %. Z hlediska energetick\u00E9ho zisku a n\u00E1ro\u010Dnosti na vstupy energie se jev\u00ED jako nejvhodn\u011Bj\u0161\u00ED vyu\u017E\u00EDv\u00E1n\u00ED TTP dv\u011Bma se\u010Demi za rok. Z hlediska kvality p\u00EDce v kombinaci s vyu\u017Eit\u00EDm neobnoviteln\u00FDch zdroj\u016F energie m\u016F\u017Eeme p"@cs . "38" . . "Mi\u010Dov\u00E1, Pavl\u00EDna" . .