. . "2"^^ . . . "40096" . "European Union funds represent an important financial source and unique opportunity in many fields of the Czech economy. The aim of this paper is to calculate profitability of a subsidy for the forestation plan. Financial effect could be significantly higher compared to other possibilities, which foresters have. One authentic example of subsidy use for forestation of a property with its costs and incomes was calculated and compared to other possibilities, using the property in a time period of 16 years. It is the time period of the forestation plan. Net present value (NPV) of cash flows from forestation plan was compared with present value from renting the property for the same time and as well as for infinity. Results prove that initial investment for foresting was paid back already in the first year by subsidy and the NPV of forestation plan is more than 111 thousands CZK per 1 ha (4,044 EUR) what is almost 2 times higher, compared to renting this property for market price." . . "Ostravice" . "Profitability of EU subsidy for the forestation plan in the Czech Republic"@en . "RIV/47813059:19520/14:#0002722!RIV15-MSM-19520___" . "HALTOFOV\u00C1, Pavl\u00EDna" . "Profitability of EU subsidy for the forestation plan in the Czech Republic" . . "RIV/47813059:19520/14:#0002722" . "2014-01-01+01:00"^^ . "P\u0158E\u010CKOV\u00C1, Lenka" . "9"^^ . . "Ventruba, Jarom\u00EDr" . "Sborn\u00EDk p\u0159\u00EDsp\u011Bvk\u016F XII. mezin\u00E1rodn\u00ED v\u011Bdeck\u00E9 konference Hospod\u00E1\u0159sk\u00E1 politika v \u010Dlensk\u00FDch zem\u00EDch Evropsk\u00E9 unie" . "Slezsk\u00E1 univerzita v Opav\u011B" . "Profitability of EU subsidy for the forestation plan in the Czech Republic"@en . "I" . . . . "EU funds; forestry; net present value; Czech Republic"@en . . . . "European Union funds represent an important financial source and unique opportunity in many fields of the Czech economy. The aim of this paper is to calculate profitability of a subsidy for the forestation plan. Financial effect could be significantly higher compared to other possibilities, which foresters have. One authentic example of subsidy use for forestation of a property with its costs and incomes was calculated and compared to other possibilities, using the property in a time period of 16 years. It is the time period of the forestation plan. Net present value (NPV) of cash flows from forestation plan was compared with present value from renting the property for the same time and as well as for infinity. Results prove that initial investment for foresting was paid back already in the first year by subsidy and the NPV of forestation plan is more than 111 thousands CZK per 1 ha (4,044 EUR) what is almost 2 times higher, compared to renting this property for market price."@en . "Karvin\u00E1" . "19520" . "[28AEDD5B1829]" . "3"^^ . "978-80-7510-045-0" . . . "Profitability of EU subsidy for the forestation plan in the Czech Republic" . . .