. . "Esence materi\u00E1ln\u00EDch jsoucen v kontextu psychologie Tom\u00E1\u0161e Akvinsk\u00E9ho: Pozn\u00E1mky k vztahu psychologie a metafyziky v De ente et essentia." . "Thomas Aquinas advocates a noticeably anti-dualistic anthropological position, which forces him to explain human beings as metaphysically complex beings. This would be impossible on the physical level alone. However, the problem of the essence of material forms is still elaborated insufficiently. As to my knowledge, there are still two questions, which have not been properly answered: (a) How should the matter in the essence of particular beings be comprehended; b) how it is possible to combine the existence of an indivisible soul with its being the very basis of intellect and the form of the body. The paper unveils Aquinas\u2019s differentiated approach to these questions in order to suggest a new interpretation of the essence of material beings. Rendered in a wider context of Thomas\u2019s psychology, it would comply with following requirements: a) historical-philosophical coherence, by which we mean primarily a meaningful categorization of the elaborated concept into the historical-philosophical framework; b) metaphysical coherence and c) philosophical-psychological coherence."@en . . . "[B1A2362B2F1C]" . "Filozofia" . "Esence materi\u00E1ln\u00EDch jsoucen v kontextu psychologie Tom\u00E1\u0161e Akvinsk\u00E9ho: Pozn\u00E1mky k vztahu psychologie a metafyziky v De ente et essentia."@cs . . "12"^^ . . "The Essence of Material Beings in the Context of Philosophical Psychology of Thomas Aquinas: Notes to the Relation between Metaphysics and Psychology in De Ente et Essentia"@en . . "Thomas Aquinas; essentia; form; human beings; pluralism of forms; soul; human body"@en . "The Essence of Material Beings in the Context of Philosophical Psychology of Thomas Aquinas: Notes to the Relation between Metaphysics and Psychology in De Ente et Essentia"@en . "Esence materi\u00E1ln\u00EDch jsoucen v kontextu psychologie Tom\u00E1\u0161e Akvinsk\u00E9ho: Pozn\u00E1mky k vztahu psychologie a metafyziky v De ente et essentia." . "Tom\u00E1\u0161 Akvinsk\u00FD stoj\u00ED na vrcholu st\u0159edov\u011Bk\u00E9 filosofie. Pozitivn\u011B uzav\u00EDr\u00E1 tradici uva\u017Eov\u00E1n\u00ED o \u010Dlov\u011Bku, kter\u00E1 v prost\u0159ed\u00ED k\u0159es\u0165ansky inspirovan\u00E9 filosofie po\u010D\u00EDn\u00E1 ji\u017E Augustinovou snahou sladit k\u0159es\u0165ansk\u00FD a filosofick\u00FD obraz \u010Dlov\u011Bka, a to t\u00EDm, \u017Ee se mu s vyu\u017Eit\u00EDm aristotelsk\u00E9ho hylemorfismu a avicennovsk\u00E9 teorie distinkce byt\u00ED a esence da\u0159\u00ED filosoficky explikovat jeho jednotu. Tato explikace je u Tom\u00E1\u0161e Akvinsk\u00E9ho uskute\u010Dn\u011Bna na metafyzick\u00E9 p\u016Fd\u011B a p\u0159edkl\u00E1dan\u00FD \u010Dl\u00E1nek ukazuje, jak\u00FD postup Tom\u00E1\u0161 Akvinsk\u00FD zvolil. Dle na\u0161eho soudu stoj\u00ED v centru jeho \u0159e\u0161en\u00ED probl\u00E9m esence materi\u00E1ln\u00EDch jsoucen. Ten ale nen\u00ED interprety je\u0161t\u011B dostate\u010Dn\u011B z\u0159eteln\u011B uchopen ve sv\u00FDch jednotliv\u00FDch aspektech, je\u017E mohou b\u00FDt nazna\u010Deny dv\u011Bma z\u00E1kladn\u00EDmi ot\u00E1zkami: a) jak je materie obsa\u017Eena v esenc\u00EDch jednotlivin; b) jak je mo\u017En\u00E9 slou\u010Dit p\u0159edpoklad du\u0161e jako ned\u011Bliteln\u00E9 formy a z\u00E1rove\u0148 formy, je\u017E zakl\u00E1d\u00E1 lidsk\u00E9 t\u011Blo i intelekt. C\u00EDlem \u010Dl\u00E1nku je uk\u00E1zat, jak diferencovan\u00E1 je Tom\u00E1\u0161ova pozice a jak\u00E9 je m\u00EDsto esenc\u00ED materi\u00E1ln\u00EDch jsoucen v \u0161ir\u0161\u00EDm kontextu jeho filosofick\u00E9ho, p\u0159edev\u0161\u00EDm v\u0161ak metafyzick\u00E9ho a filosoficko-psychologick\u00E9ho my\u0161len\u00ED."@cs . "Tom\u00E1\u0161 Akvinsk\u00FD stoj\u00ED na vrcholu st\u0159edov\u011Bk\u00E9 filosofie. Pozitivn\u011B uzav\u00EDr\u00E1 tradici uva\u017Eov\u00E1n\u00ED o \u010Dlov\u011Bku, kter\u00E1 v prost\u0159ed\u00ED k\u0159es\u0165ansky inspirovan\u00E9 filosofie po\u010D\u00EDn\u00E1 ji\u017E Augustinovou snahou sladit k\u0159es\u0165ansk\u00FD a filosofick\u00FD obraz \u010Dlov\u011Bka, a to t\u00EDm, \u017Ee se mu s vyu\u017Eit\u00EDm aristotelsk\u00E9ho hylemorfismu a avicennovsk\u00E9 teorie distinkce byt\u00ED a esence da\u0159\u00ED filosoficky explikovat jeho jednotu. Tato explikace je u Tom\u00E1\u0161e Akvinsk\u00E9ho uskute\u010Dn\u011Bna na metafyzick\u00E9 p\u016Fd\u011B a p\u0159edkl\u00E1dan\u00FD \u010Dl\u00E1nek ukazuje, jak\u00FD postup Tom\u00E1\u0161 Akvinsk\u00FD zvolil. Dle na\u0161eho soudu stoj\u00ED v centru jeho \u0159e\u0161en\u00ED probl\u00E9m esence materi\u00E1ln\u00EDch jsoucen. Ten ale nen\u00ED interprety je\u0161t\u011B dostate\u010Dn\u011B z\u0159eteln\u011B uchopen ve sv\u00FDch jednotliv\u00FDch aspektech, je\u017E mohou b\u00FDt nazna\u010Deny dv\u011Bma z\u00E1kladn\u00EDmi ot\u00E1zkami: a) jak je materie obsa\u017Eena v esenc\u00EDch jednotlivin; b) jak je mo\u017En\u00E9 slou\u010Dit p\u0159edpoklad du\u0161e jako ned\u011Bliteln\u00E9 formy a z\u00E1rove\u0148 formy, je\u017E zakl\u00E1d\u00E1 lidsk\u00E9 t\u011Blo i intelekt. C\u00EDlem \u010Dl\u00E1nku je uk\u00E1zat, jak diferencovan\u00E1 je Tom\u00E1\u0161ova pozice a jak\u00E9 je m\u00EDsto esenc\u00ED materi\u00E1ln\u00EDch jsoucen v \u0161ir\u0161\u00EDm kontextu jeho filosofick\u00E9ho, p\u0159edev\u0161\u00EDm v\u0161ak metafyzick\u00E9ho a filosoficko-psychologick\u00E9ho my\u0161len\u00ED." . . . "N" . "69" . . "0046-385X" . "RIV/47813059:19510/14:#0000330" . . "SK - Slovensk\u00E1 republika" . . . . "14982" . "Slov\u00E1\u010Dek, Petr" . . "1"^^ . "19510" . . . "9" . "1"^^ . "Esence materi\u00E1ln\u00EDch jsoucen v kontextu psychologie Tom\u00E1\u0161e Akvinsk\u00E9ho: Pozn\u00E1mky k vztahu psychologie a metafyziky v De ente et essentia."@cs . . "RIV/47813059:19510/14:#0000330!RIV15-MSM-19510___" .