. "8" . "RIV/44555601:13510/14:43886497!RIV15-MSM-13510___" . "\u00DAsp\u011B\u0161nost program\u016F zam\u011B\u0159en\u00FDch na integraci v obc\u00EDch se soci\u00E1ln\u011B vylou\u010Den\u00FDmi lokalitami" . . "1"^^ . "Va\u0161at, Jan" . . "The Succes of programs aimed at integration in communities with socially excluded localities"@en . . "CZ - \u010Cesk\u00E1 republika" . . "I" . "13510" . "[4FEE89E8E975]" . "52524" . "5"^^ . . . . "RIV/44555601:13510/14:43886497" . "The Succes of programs aimed at integration in communities with socially excluded localities"@en . "Succes; Integration programs; Socially excluded localities'; Communities; Integration"@en . "\u00DAsp\u011B\u0161nost program\u016F zam\u011B\u0159en\u00FDch na integraci v obc\u00EDch se soci\u00E1ln\u011B vylou\u010Den\u00FDmi lokalitami" . . "This text sets as its main aim to answer the question how it is possible to define the success of programs dealing with integration in the communities with one or more of the socially excluded localities. At the local level there are a number of projects and programs defining oneself label %22integration%22, but always from different parties, especially from the media space, we hear complaints about the fact that the %22integration%22 failing, although it spent a significant amount of funds from sources of public, private and Europe. But mean integration the same thing in diferent programs? Are there accordance between the desired goal integral named program and the theoretical definition of integration?"@en . . . . . "F\u00F3rum soci\u00E1ln\u00ED politiky" . "\u00DAsp\u011B\u0161nost program\u016F zam\u011B\u0159en\u00FDch na integraci v obc\u00EDch se soci\u00E1ln\u011B vylou\u010Den\u00FDmi lokalitami"@cs . "Tento text si klade jako sv\u016Fj hlavn\u00ED c\u00EDl zodpov\u011Bzen\u00ED ot\u00E1zky, jak je mo\u017En\u00E9 definovat \u00FAsp\u011B\u0161nost program\u016F zab\u00FDvaj\u00EDc\u00EDch se integrac\u00ED v obc\u00EDch, v nich\u017E se nach\u00E1z\u00ED jedna nebo v\u00EDce soci\u00E1ln\u011B vylou\u010Den\u00FDch lokalit. Na lok\u00E1ln\u00ED \u00FArovni p\u016Fsob\u00ED \u0159ada projekt\u016F a program\u016F definuj\u00EDc\u00EDch sebe sama n\u00E1lepkou %22integra\u010Dn\u00ED%22, p\u0159esto neust\u00E1le z r\u016Fzn\u00FDch stran, zejm\u00E9na z medi\u00E1ln\u00EDho prostoru, m\u016F\u017Eeme sl\u00FDchat stesky nad t\u00EDm, \u017Ee se %22integrace%22 neda\u0159\u00ED, a\u010Dkoliv je na ni vynakl\u00E1d\u00E1no nemal\u00E9 mno\u017Estv\u00ED finan\u010Dn\u00EDch prost\u0159edk\u016F ze zdroj\u016F st\u00E1tn\u00EDch, soukrom\u00FDch i evropsk\u00FDch. Je ale v jednotliv\u00FDch programech m\u00EDn\u011Bno integrac\u00ED v\u017Edy tot\u00E9\u017E? A shoduje se k\u00FD\u017Een\u00FD c\u00EDl integra\u010Dn\u011B pojmenovan\u00E9ho programu s teoretick\u00FDm vymezen\u00EDm integrace? Nen\u00ED tak\u00E9 tajemstv\u00EDm, \u017Ee n\u011Bkter\u00E9 lok\u00E1ln\u00ED politiky se pokou\u0161ej\u00ED o implementaci opat\u0159en\u00ED vytv\u00E1\u0159en\u00FDch na st\u00E1tn\u00ED \u00FArovni, jin\u00E9 se od t\u00E9to m\u00E9n\u011B \u010Di v\u00EDce odkl\u00E1n\u011Bj\u00ED a jin\u00E9 se v\u016F\u010Di st\u00E1tn\u00ED politice p\u0159\u00EDmo vymezuj\u00ED jako\u017Eto jej\u00ED protiklad."@cs . "1802-5854" . . "4" . "\u00DAsp\u011B\u0161nost program\u016F zam\u011B\u0159en\u00FDch na integraci v obc\u00EDch se soci\u00E1ln\u011B vylou\u010Den\u00FDmi lokalitami"@cs . . . "1"^^ . "Tento text si klade jako sv\u016Fj hlavn\u00ED c\u00EDl zodpov\u011Bzen\u00ED ot\u00E1zky, jak je mo\u017En\u00E9 definovat \u00FAsp\u011B\u0161nost program\u016F zab\u00FDvaj\u00EDc\u00EDch se integrac\u00ED v obc\u00EDch, v nich\u017E se nach\u00E1z\u00ED jedna nebo v\u00EDce soci\u00E1ln\u011B vylou\u010Den\u00FDch lokalit. Na lok\u00E1ln\u00ED \u00FArovni p\u016Fsob\u00ED \u0159ada projekt\u016F a program\u016F definuj\u00EDc\u00EDch sebe sama n\u00E1lepkou %22integra\u010Dn\u00ED%22, p\u0159esto neust\u00E1le z r\u016Fzn\u00FDch stran, zejm\u00E9na z medi\u00E1ln\u00EDho prostoru, m\u016F\u017Eeme sl\u00FDchat stesky nad t\u00EDm, \u017Ee se %22integrace%22 neda\u0159\u00ED, a\u010Dkoliv je na ni vynakl\u00E1d\u00E1no nemal\u00E9 mno\u017Estv\u00ED finan\u010Dn\u00EDch prost\u0159edk\u016F ze zdroj\u016F st\u00E1tn\u00EDch, soukrom\u00FDch i evropsk\u00FDch. Je ale v jednotliv\u00FDch programech m\u00EDn\u011Bno integrac\u00ED v\u017Edy tot\u00E9\u017E? A shoduje se k\u00FD\u017Een\u00FD c\u00EDl integra\u010Dn\u011B pojmenovan\u00E9ho programu s teoretick\u00FDm vymezen\u00EDm integrace? Nen\u00ED tak\u00E9 tajemstv\u00EDm, \u017Ee n\u011Bkter\u00E9 lok\u00E1ln\u00ED politiky se pokou\u0161ej\u00ED o implementaci opat\u0159en\u00ED vytv\u00E1\u0159en\u00FDch na st\u00E1tn\u00ED \u00FArovni, jin\u00E9 se od t\u00E9to m\u00E9n\u011B \u010Di v\u00EDce odkl\u00E1n\u011Bj\u00ED a jin\u00E9 se v\u016F\u010Di st\u00E1tn\u00ED politice p\u0159\u00EDmo vymezuj\u00ED jako\u017Eto jej\u00ED protiklad." .