"Political Change in Czechoslovakia: The Fall of the Nondemocratic Regime in 1989 in the Perspective of theory of Transition"@en . "[3983C08D6A43]" . . "Political Change in Czechoslovakia: The Fall of the Nondemocratic Regime in 1989 in the Perspective of theory of Transition" . "N" . "Political Change in Czechoslovakia: The Fall of the Nondemocratic Regime in 1989 in the Perspective of theory of Transition"@en . . . "democracy, transition, communism, Czechoslovakia, politics, regime"@en . . . "41" . . "RIV/26482789:_____/14:#0000431" . "Political Change in Czechoslovakia: The Fall of the Nondemocratic Regime in 1989 in the Perspective of theory of Transition" . "RO - Rumunsko" . . "2344-4452" . . "37283" . "11"^^ . . "RIV/26482789:_____/14:#0000431!RIV15-MSM-26482789" . "Revista de \u015Etiin\u0163e Politice" . . . . "The author deals with the problem of denomination of the process of political change in Czechoslovakia in November of 1989, and try set this process in the frame of the theory of transition to democracy. He analyses main turning points \u2013 the events, which influenced the development of political change in Czechoslovakia. He starts with the analysis of last period of Communist region in the 80 \u00B4s and shows the processes inside leadership of Communist party (KS\u010C). He also shows the position of opposition in Czechoslovakia in this period. Afterwards he describes the process of the fall of regime in November 1989. These changes were achieved by public demonstrations in Prague and other big cities, and also by the talks between leaders of oppositional movements and representatives of communist Federal government. The author shows strategies of opposition and KS\u010C in this process. The author tries to find more precise politological term for this process of political change. He is inspirated by many studies of transitology in the Political Science (Rustow, di Palma, Przeworski, Linz, Stepan), also of Czech authors (Dvo\u0159\u00E1kov\u00E1). Author analyses three phases of the Czechoslovak case: 1. Phase of preparation (the both sides recognize own power each other and the find out that they must respect each other), 2. Decisive phase (both sides make agreement about the solution of the situation), 3. Phase of Habituation (stabilization of the new democratic political system). The author\u00B4s conclusion is that the political change in Czechoslovakia is possible to designate as transition to democracy by the collapse of communist system, because the leadership of Communist party was not able to solve the economical and political crisis in Czechoslovakia in the 80\u00B4s and also was not able to react to the people\u00B4s demonstrations in November of 1989."@en . "1"^^ . . "The author deals with the problem of denomination of the process of political change in Czechoslovakia in November of 1989, and try set this process in the frame of the theory of transition to democracy. He analyses main turning points \u2013 the events, which influenced the development of political change in Czechoslovakia. He starts with the analysis of last period of Communist region in the 80 \u00B4s and shows the processes inside leadership of Communist party (KS\u010C). He also shows the position of opposition in Czechoslovakia in this period. Afterwards he describes the process of the fall of regime in November 1989. These changes were achieved by public demonstrations in Prague and other big cities, and also by the talks between leaders of oppositional movements and representatives of communist Federal government. The author shows strategies of opposition and KS\u010C in this process. The author tries to find more precise politological term for this process of political change. He is inspirated by many studies of transitology in the Political Science (Rustow, di Palma, Przeworski, Linz, Stepan), also of Czech authors (Dvo\u0159\u00E1kov\u00E1). Author analyses three phases of the Czechoslovak case: 1. Phase of preparation (the both sides recognize own power each other and the find out that they must respect each other), 2. Decisive phase (both sides make agreement about the solution of the situation), 3. Phase of Habituation (stabilization of the new democratic political system). The author\u00B4s conclusion is that the political change in Czechoslovakia is possible to designate as transition to democracy by the collapse of communist system, because the leadership of Communist party was not able to solve the economical and political crisis in Czechoslovakia in the 80\u00B4s and also was not able to react to the people\u00B4s demonstrations in November of 1989." . . "2014" . . . "1"^^ . "Bure\u0161, Jan" . .