. "Vrba, Radim\u00EDr" . . "179-180" . "Fujcik, Luk\u00E1\u0161" . . "80-238-9260-6" . "The device for pesticide toxicity analysis"@en . . . . "RIV/00216305:26220/02:PU29209" . "Analyz\u00E1tor toxicity pesticid\u016F" . "Analyz\u00E1tor, detekce, pesticidy"@en . "2"^^ . "P(GA102/00/0939), Z(MSM 262200022)" . . "The device for pesticide toxicity analysis"@en . "Analyz\u00E1tor toxicity pesticid\u016F"@cs . "H\u00E1ze, Ji\u0159\u00ED" . . "Sko\u010Ddopole, Michal" . "Jakubka, Lubo\u0161" . . . "Krej\u010D\u00ED, Jan" . . . . . "Se\u010D u Chrudimi" . . "Se\u010D u Chrudimi" . . "638419" . "6"^^ . . . "6"^^ . "Probl\u00E9m detekce toxicity pesticid\u016F je v\u00E1\u017En\u00FD hlavn\u011B z hlediska ceny jedn\u00E9 anal\u00FDzy (minim\u00E1ln\u011B 1 000 K\u010D) a mo\u017Enosti rychl\u00E9ho stanoven\u00ED koncentrace p\u0159\u00EDmo v poln\u00EDch podm\u00EDnk\u00E1ch. Proto\u017Ee je cena jedn\u00E9 anal\u00FDzy vysok\u00E1 a anal\u00FDzu je nutno prov\u00E1d\u011Bt v laborato\u0159i, je \u010Dasov\u00FD odstup mezi odb\u011Brem vzorku a samotnou anal\u00FDzou velk\u00FD (1 a\u017E 5 dn\u00ED). Mno\u017Estv\u00ED odebran\u00FDch vzork\u016F a jejich proveden\u00FDch anal\u00FDz je velmi mal\u00E9 a pravd\u011Bpodobnost nalezen\u00ED pozitivn\u00EDho vzorku n\u00EDzk\u00E1. V roce 1999 bylo provedeno v jihomoravsk\u00E9m kraji cca 400 oodb\u011Br\u016F vzork\u016F dle vyhl\u00E1\u0161ky, p\u0159i\u010Dem\u017E pozitivn\u00EDch n\u00E1lez\u016F bylo m\u00E9n\u011B ne\u017E 10. Kontrola je tedy velmi neefektivn\u00ED.P\u0159\u00EDsp\u011Bvek ukazuje prvn\u00ED zku\u0161enosti s p\u0159enosn\u00FDm analyz\u00E1torem toxicity organofosforov\u00FDch pesticid\u016F. Anal\u00FDza proveden\u00E1 t\u00EDmto p\u0159\u00EDstrojem je finan\u010Dn\u011B a\u010Dasov\u011B nen\u00E1ro\u010Dn\u00E1. Cena jedn\u00E9 anal\u00FDzy je do 300 K\u010D. Anal\u00FDza m\u016F\u017Ee b\u00FDt provedena do 30 minut. P\u0159edpokl\u00E1d\u00E1me, \u017Ee p\u0159\u00EDstroj umo\u017En\u00ED efektivn\u00ED prescreening vzork\u016F p\u0159\u00EDmo v m\u00EDst\u011B odb\u011Bru nebo laborato\u0159i. Pln\u00E1 klasick\u00E1 anal\u00FDza bude provedena pouze u pozitivn\u00EDch n\u00E1l" . "[B25783CF5DB3]" . "Vodn\u00ED zdoje s.r.o. Ekomonitor" . "Probl\u00E9m detekce toxicity pesticid\u016F je v\u00E1\u017En\u00FD hlavn\u011B z hlediska ceny jedn\u00E9 anal\u00FDzy (minim\u00E1ln\u011B 1 000 K\u010D) a mo\u017Enosti rychl\u00E9ho stanoven\u00ED koncentrace p\u0159\u00EDmo v poln\u00EDch podm\u00EDnk\u00E1ch. Proto\u017Ee je cena jedn\u00E9 anal\u00FDzy vysok\u00E1 a anal\u00FDzu je nutno prov\u00E1d\u011Bt v laborato\u0159i, je \u010Dasov\u00FD odstup mezi odb\u011Brem vzorku a samotnou anal\u00FDzou velk\u00FD (1 a\u017E 5 dn\u00ED). Mno\u017Estv\u00ED odebran\u00FDch vzork\u016F a jejich proveden\u00FDch anal\u00FDz je velmi mal\u00E9 a pravd\u011Bpodobnost nalezen\u00ED pozitivn\u00EDho vzorku n\u00EDzk\u00E1. V roce 1999 bylo provedeno v jihomoravsk\u00E9m kraji cca 400 oodb\u011Br\u016F vzork\u016F dle vyhl\u00E1\u0161ky, p\u0159i\u010Dem\u017E pozitivn\u00EDch n\u00E1lez\u016F bylo m\u00E9n\u011B ne\u017E 10. Kontrola je tedy velmi neefektivn\u00ED.P\u0159\u00EDsp\u011Bvek ukazuje prvn\u00ED zku\u0161enosti s p\u0159enosn\u00FDm analyz\u00E1torem toxicity organofosforov\u00FDch pesticid\u016F. Anal\u00FDza proveden\u00E1 t\u00EDmto p\u0159\u00EDstrojem je finan\u010Dn\u011B a\u010Dasov\u011B nen\u00E1ro\u010Dn\u00E1. Cena jedn\u00E9 anal\u00FDzy je do 300 K\u010D. Anal\u00FDza m\u016F\u017Ee b\u00FDt provedena do 30 minut. P\u0159edpokl\u00E1d\u00E1me, \u017Ee p\u0159\u00EDstroj umo\u017En\u00ED efektivn\u00ED prescreening vzork\u016F p\u0159\u00EDmo v m\u00EDst\u011B odb\u011Bru nebo laborato\u0159i. Pln\u00E1 klasick\u00E1 anal\u00FDza bude provedena pouze u pozitivn\u00EDch n\u00E1l"@cs . . . "Sborn\u00EDk pracovn\u00ED konference Ekotoxikologick\u00E9 biotesty 1" . . . "Fast detection of pesticide toxicity in field conditions is very important in many aspects such as: - longtime influence of low concentrations on man\u00B4s health, - influence on environment, - pesticide storage, - move in food chain, - intoxication of high concentrations and their fast detection, - speed of an analysis and possibility to make a test in field conditions, - price of one test. All of the above mentioned points are not fully solved yet. The price of one test is too high, 33 EEuro is the minimum. The test must be performed in a laboratory. That is why the time between taking the sample in field and its analysis is too long (1 to 5 days). The probability of finding a possitive sample is low, because the number of samples and their tests is very small. In 1999 about 400 tests were done according to the notice in south-moravian region. Only 10 decisions were possitive, the control is very inefficient mainly from economical point of view. The low costs and time-undemanding anal"@en . "Analyz\u00E1tor toxicity pesticid\u016F"@cs . "RIV/00216305:26220/02:PU29209!RIV06-GA0-26220___" . . "26220" . "Analyz\u00E1tor toxicity pesticid\u016F" . "2002-09-18+02:00"^^ .